“Gooooooooooaaaaaaaaaallllllllll…! Pi is mine now!”

[humanbydefault]

“Gooooooooooaaaaaaaaaallllllllll…! Pi is mine now!”

“The caravan of digits that is pi

does not stop at the edge of the page,

but runs off the table and into the air,

over the wall, a leaf, a bird's nest, the clouds, straight into the sky,

through all the bloatedness and bottomlessness.

Oh how short, all but mouse-like is the comet's tail!”

(Wislawa Szymborska)

I will prove that “pi” equals 3 plus the Square Root of 2!

Let’s write both constants first:

Pi:

3. 14159 26535 8979323

Square Root of 2:

1. 41421 3562373

I will make the necessary conversions (not many though!) on “pi” first:

14159 26535 8979323

141 [59] 2 [65] 358 [979] 323!

141 [4] 2 [1] 358 [4 + 2 + 4] 323!

141421358[10 = 0] 323!

*10 and 0 are the beginning of a cycle. See the Mayan numbers. Observe that converting 9 into 4 and 6 into 1 we had to ‘reduced’ in two-half cycles (one complete cycle) or [-10] that compensated the imbalance created by [10] as the result of [4 + 2 + 4]!
I used five conversions which is an ODD one meaning that still there is a “half-cycle” accounted for…

141 421 358 323! This is the final number! Plus “half-cycle”!

This is the Square Root of 2:

141421 3562373

14142 135 [6 + 2] 3[7]3!

141 421 35[6 + 2] 3 [2] 3!

141 421 358 323!

*Since I only converted 7 into 2, I have produced an ODD conversion “owing ‘half-cycle’ to the final results” and that was the same solution in “pi” as well!

141 421 358 323! And 141 421 358 323!

Exactly the same number!!!

"I, Miguel De Zayas hereby officially claim that I found the “hidden connection” between “pi” and “Square Root of 2” the 9th of August of 2010."

YOU TOO ARE INVITED TO THE PARTY… WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE A PIECE OF MY PIE?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Pi_pie2.jpg

[labelwench]

In the household where I was a child, we were taught our fractions by dividing the dessert into the appropriate number of servings.

Proper etiquette was that whomever did the dividing, took the last remaining serving.

As sweets were rather seldom, we all became very accurate in dispensing the 'just' desserts.



My apologies for not being of more assistance to you in the discussion, as my experience with numbers does not enable me to perceive the meanings that seem so apparent to you.

My gift of communing with creatures is likewise incomprehensible to most.

Sometimes, our journey is a lonely one, yet none the less worthwhile, as long as it holds meaning for each one as they travel their own path. On occasion, we encounter others who may share the way, briefly, or for longer duration.

[humanbydefault]

“A hidden symmetry no one had seen until now”

What I’m about to show you has been kept safe from the keen eye of thousands of brilliant Mathematicians since “pi” was first discovered. Only after numbers were properly referred to cycles and to each other by their “Image-Object configuration” -the fundaments of Physimatics- evidence of a never imagined linkage between those fractions were finally uncovered.

To make easier to the untrained eye I assigned a different color to the related ‘links’ as they secretly “connect” with each other:

3.14159265358979323846 >< 26433832795028841971


22846 >< 26433

89793 >< 83279

26535 >< 50288

14159 >< 41971

Let’s analyze what we have. As you may observe I discovered that the first 8 “links” [groups of 5 fractions] were repeating an interesting pattern far from being chaotic.

As you see the red links, they are practically the same with two small differences:

a)The one on the left has a 2 instead of a 3.

b) The one on the left has the image [8] while the ‘link’ to the right has its object [3].

As we continue with the purple links, there is only one difference; left has a [9] while right has a [2].

The green ‘links’ just as seen before with the red ‘links’ present image-object conversion but this time twice; 5-0 and 8-3. Left had a [6] while right had an [8].

Finally the orange ‘links’ just as the purple ‘links’ before them remain identical (no image-object) left with a [5] while right with a [7].

The most amazing feature in this ‘progression’ is the numerical relationship between the ones on the left with respect to the ones to the right.

LEFT

2-9-6-5

From 2 to 6 there is a difference of 4!

From 9 to 5 there is (also) a difference of 4!

RIGHT

3-2-8-7

From 3 to 8 there is a difference of 5! [image-object]

From 2 to 7 there is (also) a difference of 5!

With this undeniable mathematical demonstration I have shown you an evidence to prove that those seemingly chaotic decimals “building up” one of the most important constant in Physics and mathematics from ancient times respond to an inherent Physical symmetry that is a legitimate reflection of our Reality as well.
What is amazing is that where those two “branches” or “wings” break apart from each other was the exact number of decimals found today to match exactly the same decimals inside the Square Root of 2…

Coincidence… I don’t think so!


One last thing... I want you to see that no number was "relocated" from its original site inside the fractions of "pi" and the square Root of 2 in the first article of this thread.

No "dirty tricks" and no "arbitrary manipulation of numbers" of any kind.

It is only reasonable to believe that given the fact that "pi" and the 'square root of 2' were so closely related to each other, Alpha had to "poop up" in both somehow... I believe that "The Pandora Box" had just been open and much more secrets will be unveiled in a near future.

[humanbydefault]

[QUOTE=humanbydefault;124559]

“A hidden symmetry no one had seen until now”

What I’m about to show you has been kept safe from the keen eye of thousands of brilliant Mathematicians since “pi” was first discovered. Only after numbers were properly referred to cycles and to each other by their “Image-Object configuration” -the fundaments of Physimatics- evidence of a never imagined linkage between those fractions were finally uncovered.

To make easier to the untrained eye I assigned a different color to the related ‘links’ as they secretly “connect” with each other:

3.14159265358979323846 >< 26433832795028841971


22846 >< 26433

89793 >< 83279

26535 >< 50288

14159 >< 41971


An unfortunate numeral mistake was made while copying one single number. However it was the comission of that mistake the 'missing link' in the application of the concept of symmetry in the 8 (eight) 'links' relationship...


Take a look now after a needed correction was made.

“A hidden symmetry no one had seen until now”

What I’m about to show you has been kept safe from the keen eye of thousands of brilliant Mathematicians since “pi” was first discovered. Only after numbers were properly referred to cycles and to each other by their “Image-Object configuration” -the fundaments of Physimatics- evidence of a never imagined linkage between those fractions were finally uncovered.
To make easier to the untrained eye I assigned a different color to the related ‘links’ as they secretly “connect” with each other:

3.14159265358979323846 >< 26433832795028841971

23846 >< 26433
89793 >< 83279
26535 >< 50288
14159 >< 41971

Let’s analyze what we have. As you may observe I discovered that the first 8 “links” [groups of 5 fractions] were repeating an interesting pattern far from being chaotic.

As you see the red links, they are practically the same with two small differences

a)The one on the left has a 8 instead of a 3.

b) The one on the left has the image [8] while the ‘link’ to the right has its object [3].

As we continue with the purple links, there is only one difference; left has a [9] while right has a [2].

The green ‘links’ just as seen before with the red ‘links’ present image-object conversion but this time twice; 5-0 and 8-3. Left had a [6] while right had an [8].

Finally the orange ‘links’ just as the purple ‘links’ before them remain identical (no image-object) left with a [5] while right with a [7].

The most amazing feature in this ‘progression’ is the numerical relationship between the ones on the left with respect to the ones to the right.

LEFT

8-9-6-5
Symmetry results from opposite increases:

From 8 to 9 (+1) balanced by a decrease from 6 to 5 (-1)!

RIGHT

3-2-8-7

From 3 to 8 there is a difference of 5! [image-object]

From 2 to 7 there is (also) a difference of 5!


Now we do have enough evidence to support that symmetry was preserved along the progression.

I give you two basic reasons for that statement:


1) If you first analyze the right "wing" of "pi's decimal progression" you'll identify two 'Image-Object configurations as I had mentioned earlier...


3 >< 8 and 2>< 7!


Now, check out that adding up 8 + 2 = 10! (one cycle) and also adding up 3 + 7 = 10! (the same). If you add up 3 + 8 = 11! adding up 2 + 7 = 9! A difference of 2!

This difference was a repetitive finding among every single operation performed in the past with different numerical approaches. The latest one with a series of multiplication of 1.414 (A model of Reality showed in my blogs)

Go back and check on the numbers I shown you above:
On the left column (representing the 'left wing') we could see that:
8 + 6 = 14! and so it is 9 + 5 = 14!

On the right column (representing the 'right wing') we could see a paradoxical effect:

3 + 8 = 11 but 2 + 7 = 9 (not an identity) however as shown earlier the identity stands adding up the differences in a inward direction:
3 + 7 = 8 + 2 = 10!


I appologize for my mistake... I'm only human (by default)

[humanbydefault]

3.14159265358979323846 "L" >< 26433832795028841971 “R"



Analysis of the progression:

“LEFT WING”

8-9-6-5

8 + 6 = 14! And so it is 9 + 5 = 14!

“RIGHT WING”

3-2-8-7

From 3 to 8 there is a difference of 5! [image-object]

From 2 to 7 there is (also) a difference of 5!

3 + 7 = 10! And so it is 2 = 8 = 10!

This is where “Mirror Analysis” comes pretty ‘handy’ to understand how symmetry was kept:

What is 14 after we ‘mirror’ its value? 14 = [1 + 4] = 5!

Twice 5 is obviously 10!

Physically speaking “pi” preserves symmetry after the elapse of one complete cycle of [10] despite a “shrinkage” observed between both “wings” or “branches”.

It is my theoretical understanding of the meaning of Alpha. It is a ratio between two seemingly asymmetrical progression due to an inherent perturbation that also represents a “mirror symmetry” analyzed as a whole and unbreakable equation.

Remember that all I found was a bunch of 8s, 5s and 10s as I grouped and ‘mirrored’ the fractions of “pi”?

It was 8 the key to unraveled the mystery too. The symmetry was hidden within the first ‘links’ of the constant in a clever way; the same way employed by Reality during the building up of orbitals.

[humanbydefault]

[3.] 14159265358979323846 “L”><“R” 26433832795028841971

Analysis of the progression:

“Left Wing”

8-9-6-5

8 + 6 = 14! And so it is 9 + 5 = 14!

“Right Wing”

3-2-8-7

From 3 to 8 there is a difference of 5! [image-object]

From 2 to 7 there is (also) a difference of 5!

3 + 7 = 10! And so it is 2 = 8 = 10!

“Factor 9 inside pi”

Let’s number each of the 8 ‘links’ involved in the symmetry:

[1] [2] [3] [4] “L” >< “R’ [5] [6] [7] [8] Done!

Adding up from the outside inward we obtain:

[1 + 8] = 9, [2 + 7] = 9, [3 + 6] = 9 and finally [4 + 5] = 9!

A curious detail is that multiplying 4 times 9…

4 x 9 = 36! Which at the same times its ‘mirror’ is also [3 + 6] = 9!

I published a few months ago how I got to 137 (Alpha) by multiplying 36 three times as implied by the 3 left to the decimal point:

36 x 36 = 1296

1296 x 36 = 46656

46656 x 36 = 1679616!

Converting those ‘images’ on top (6, 7, 9, 6 and 6):

[1] [1 + 2] [4 + 1 + 1 + 1] = [1] [3] [7] = 137!

Five conversions add a "half-cycle" inversion to the number: 1/137

Interesting isn’t it? But don't go...

You won’t believe you eyes when you see this:

Let’s take the number we obtained from the multiplication of 36 by 3

(1679616) and subtract all 8 ‘links’ posted on top:

1667916 – [14159 + 26535 +89793 +23846 + 26433 +83279 +50288 + 41971] = 132 3 312

Watch what we could do with this:

132 >< 3 >< 312

[1 + 2] 3 = 33! And also 3 [1 + 2] = 33! We know that 33 is the Prime number that corresponds to 137!

6 >< 3 >< 6 It makes 9 looking from the middle to any of the two extremes, right?

Pity that Numerology doesn’t count as “hard science” these days…

[humanbydefault]

PERFECT MATCH!

Square Root of 2

1. [41421] [3562] [37] 3[9][5][488]16[88724] 29[698]78[5696]

“Pi Constant”

[3.] [1415] [9][2653] [5] [89793][23] [846] [26][433][83279][5][28][8] [41971]

Legend:

Colors have been used to identify each fraction and its corresponding image. In the specific case of [89793]the 'matching fractions' were scattered among the left ones after every cancellation was properly matched. Even for an untrained eye the similarities are too obvious to disregard them as a simple coincidence.

I tried to left untouched certain numbers that once grouped together should be eliminated as the yellow [28] = [10] = [0] and [23]= [5] cancelling the other [5] by symmetry as well.

As you see I only posted both important numbers in science up until they reached the symmetry I proved earlier to be the ‘limit’.

“OCCAMS RAZOR”

Lately almost like an insult to one of our most sacred RAZOR in human science and Philosophy, a bunch of “Mathematicians” helped with powerful computers and sophisticated software began a race to be among the first to obtain the greatest number of decimals in both: “pi” and the square root of 2 among other irrational numbers.

This is precisely why I’ve been trying to determine the ‘Fractional Limit’ carried by a number of fractions (decimals) within the expression of those constants. If Occam’s razor implies the briefest and simplest solution or expression capable of explaining or solving certain problem…

Why should anyone go the opposite direction trying to defy common sense by excessively ‘overloading’ the same expression over and over again?

Those “wings” or “branches” I showed you in my previous article were ‘built’ -in other words- the very concept of their symmetry was ‘born’ in the center, expanding outward in both directions up to the ends in perfect harmony. I can’t think of a more beautiful solution to both constants and I personally refuse to believe that thousands and thousands of disconnected decimals out of a computer program and produced like cheap pancakes could lead us to the understanding of Reality.

It wasn’t like I (unilaterally) decided to cut the final number of decimals here or there… You saw it! It was as if the fraction itself was in charge of controlling its own “destiny”; where to begin and where to find its own end.

I guess Archimedes would have been more interested in this “odd interpretation” I discovered about his constant than the madness behind a race to nowhere… Perhaps not.

[humanbydefault]

“Come on! Read the Sign…”

The Square Root of 2’s very first E.R.P. [Encrypted Referential Pattern] is:

1. {41421} 35623 73095 04880 16887 24209 69807 8 {5696}


41421


“Pi’s” very last E.R.P. is:


3. {1415} 9265358979323846 >< 264338327950288 {41971}

41971

Could it be written yet even easier so you and a bunch of Mathematicians out there could finally get it?

I don’t think so!

The order is the same!

It was explained using a typical Physical interpretation of our numbers why was 9 the image of 4 and 7 the image of 2…

Now! I want you to take a look to the opposite E.R.P.s:

The Square Root of 2’s very last E.R.P. is:

5696

“Pi’s” very first E.R.P. is:

1415

We know already that 9 was the image of 4 and 6 the corresponding image of 1… isn’t it so?

The order of the meaningful E.R.P.s stands the same [696] [141] because we know the meaning of [5] and that is the concept of “half-cycle ahead or behind in time”. We know that “0” represents the beginning of a cycle and 5 the same cycle’s half-point during the progression of the “Quantum of Reality.”

Is there any LOGICAL or REASONABLE NEED for keeping computers busy “producing” decimals with absolute no meaning for Reality?
Haven’t I warned you in this very SITE about the repetitive nature of those E.R.P.s in the past?

Is it the case that what they are doing was “recycling” the fractions over and over again dangerously mixing “REFERENCE” from images into objects obtaining false and erroneous results?

I’m not going to answer those questions… You will!


Thank you and God bless you all!


Miguel De Zayas_author of “Physimatics”

HBD

[humanbydefault]

“Pi = √2 = Alpha (137)”

This is “pi” in its new ‘hanker suit’:


3.14159265358979323846 >< 26433832795028841971


Watch! No tricks and no magic… only a simple arithmetical addition. I will leave the 5s [four pieces of them] out in the analysis:

[1 + 4 + 1 + 9 + 2 + 6 + 3 + 8 + 9 + 7 + 9 + 3 + 2 + 3 + 8 + 4 + 6] + [2 + 6 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 8 + 3 + 2 + 7 + 9 + 2 + 8 + 8 + 4 + 1 + 9 + 7 + 1] = 172!


If one add up the “images” colored in ‘red’ from the “Left Wing” of “pi” they result in:

9 + 6 + 8 + 9 + 7 + 9 + 8 + 6 = 62!

Let’s add up the colored “images” found in blue from the “Right Wing” of “pi” too:

6 + 8 + 7 + 9 + 8 + 8 + 9 + 7 = 62!

Isn’t it AMAZING? Equal number of “images” on both sides of the symmetrical fraction.

Let’s see how far were we to obtain 137?

172 – 137 = 35! How convenient!

It only takes seven conversions from those ‘red’ and ‘blue’ images to reach 137. Since 7 x 5 = 35

The need for seven conversions was obvious just by looking at the configuration of those “images” in both “Wings”…

‘Red Wing’ symmetry:


6 + 8 + 9 + >< 7 >< + 9 + 8 + 6 [7 “images” x 5 = 35!]

‘Blue Wing’ symmetry:


8 + 7 + 9 + >< 8 >< + 8 + 9 + 7 [7 “images” x 5 = 35!]


Simple isn’t it?

Another interesting detail is that 62 or the net value of the added “images” in each “Wing” has a ‘mirror value’ equal to 8. [6 + 2] = 8!

8 as you already know is also the exact number of ‘links’ used to reach the “Fraction Limit” of “pi” as well.

8 x 5 = 40! Where each “Wing” accounts for 20.

Only a ‘Skeptical Soul’ could call this a rare coincidence…

I’m one believer!

Miguel de Zayas_Author of “Physimatics”

[humanbydefault]

“Analysis of the √2 ‘Wings’ Symmetry”

√2 = 1. 41421356237309504880><16887242096980785696


As you can observe I have colored in ‘blue’ the “images” found in the ‘Left Wing’ of the Square Root of 2’s first four E.R.P.s.

On the ‘Right Wing’ I colored with ‘red’ the “images”. Also I underlined 0s and 5s to let you know their original position in both ‘Wings’.

Let’s add up the digits inside the ‘Left Wing’ first:

[4 + 1 + 4 + 2 + 1] + [3 + 1 + 2 + 3] + [2 + 3 + 4] + [4 + 3 + 3]

[12] + [9] + [9] + [10] = 40!

Let’s add up the ones inside the ‘Right Wing’ next:

[1 + 1 + 3 + 3 + 2] + [2 + 4 + 2 + 4] + [1 + 4 + 3 + 2] + [3 + 1 + 4 + 1]

[10] + [12] + [10] + [9] = 41!

As you can see I converted into their ‘object configuration’ the ‘images’ not involved in the symmetry (‘orange colored).

The point I want you to realize is that for both “Wings” being able to reach complete balance 40 >< 40 there is the need of a ‘plus 1’ from the whole number to the left of the decimal point (Green colored).

This is the reason why “pi” begins with:

3.141(59)… That is also the last E.R.P. corresponding to √2...

Take a look for references:

3.14159265358979323846 >< 26433832795028841971


85696>>>>> This is the E.R.P. I’m referring to earlier. 1415 = 5696 (Remember that you are looking at its “image” that is why you see it inverted).

However “pi” shows a 9 instead of an 8! It is this difference the cause for the initial imbalance 40 >< 41. As this one digit changed the entire ‘Wing’s Symmetry’ follows behind transforming the numerical configuration of some ‘links’ from the original pattern we were used to recognize in √2.

With this specific analysis I have proven to you that “pi” represents the value of a circumference measuring 3 times the unit plus a fraction that is the exact “mirrored numerical configuration” of the original Square Root of 2 we have many times seen obtained from pure empirical mathematical calculations.

At the end it was merely because of a purely Physical Reason that we didn't see the exact fractional configuration of the Square Root of 2 as part of "Pi" and not a mathematical one.

Symmetry once again ruled over everything else!