Quantum Tunneling

[AntonioLao]

could you expand on these complex terms

Fermions (for example electron, neutron, proton, and neutrino) must obey Pauli's exclusion principle which means that they cannot exist in the same quantum state at the spacetime point. On the other hand, bosons (for example photons) obey the principle of superposition which means they can occupy the same quantum state anytime anywhere. This had been applied in the science and technology of LASER (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation).

[Mikal]

Antonio...thanks for responding...what your talking about here as the exclusion principle and the principle of superposition.. is this what you refer to as the "Ferimionic Obstacle" or is that something else??

Mikal

[AntonioLao]

It would be a brave fermion to disobey Pauli's exclusion principle but I guess if one does then it becomes a boson and lived happily ever after.

[Mikal]

Sweet...I'm chuckling...now Robert's hypothesis...was he suggesting his physical body quantum tunneling or the inner astral body quantum tunneling...I have experienced the latter in which I was in two places at once and seen in each place by those who knew me......this was interesting and somewhat mind boggling but is possible



Mikal

[AntonioLao]

It would be good for you to ask Robert directly since I'm poor at second guessing others. If human can be encased in a pure boson field like a time machine then spacetime travel is possible to the past or to the future.

[Mikal]

Okay when you say "pure bosom field"...your talking a pure field of mental energy...right???? I will ask Robert what he meant by that and thanks Antonio for helping me to understand those other terms....

Mikal

[AntonioLao]

mental energy equivalent to boson energy is very new to me. I need to do more investigation.

[xxyy]

Dear AntonioLao,

What do you think of the possibility that macroscopic objects can undergo quantum tunnelling? What is the possibility of a spacecraft quantum tunnelling beyond the speed of light? Does the amount of time that the quantum mechanical object tunnels for equal 1 planck second?

What do you think of the possibility of what happens in the dissallowed region? Do you think it could be that time is contained in the dissallowed region? Could it be that there is a time within time? Could it be that our universe exists in a dissallowed region between two higher dimensional, parallel reference frames? Could our universe be a quantum tunnelling object, and could this explain the origin of the big bang and how it must be possible to send something faster than the speed of light or else we wouldn't be here?

-Field

[AntonioLao]

macroscopic objects can undergo quantum tunnelling

this requires a theory of both QM and GR and without having the values of the equations becoming infinities. These was subdued by renormalization but not inside a BB singularity.

[xxyy]

Dear AntonioLao,

I have a complete theory of QM and GR if I am not mistaken which explains the possibility for macroscopic quantum mechanical objects.

My theory says that energy can only be inputed into a relativistic object in quantum mechanical intervals dictated by the planck second. So energy shall always be absorbed and converted in exact instants - planck second by planck second. This is standard QM, but what does it mean when we consider relativistic speeds approaching TSOL?

Let's say that you input 9,000 joules of energy into accelerating a relativistic object and let's say you input this energy all at once, i.e. during the duration of 1 planck second. Then the amount of acceleration which this energy will cause the object to undergo shall be calculated from the relativistic mass of the object at it's starting speed, not it's ending speed. This means that a continuously changing speed is actually making little quantum accelerations every planck second, so doing relativistic calculus is incorrect, because calculus is NOT quantized as such.

What this means is that in order for a macroscopic object to exceed the speed of light it has to garner massive acceleration, but not necessarely massive energy. The greater the acceleration, the less the energy required. The greatest possible acceleration in our universe would be the speed of light per planck second. That would be the amount of acceleration that would take you from 0 mph to the speed of light in one planck second, in which case qm supercedes gr because acceleration dominates.

The problem with particle accelerators is that they input energy far too slowly. WIth the rate that they input energy a planck second would have to be thousands of times longer for them to push the object into truly behaving quantum mechanically.

As an example, let's say our relativistic object goes from speed A to speed B in one planck second. The amount of energy required to accelerate that object to speed B from speed A shall be calculated from the relativistic mass of the object at speed A, not speed B. For time does not preclude itself.

This means that exceeding the speed of light is not about applying an infinite amount of energy, as in the sledgehammer approach - CERN. Rather, exceeding the speed of light is all about garnering huge acceleration, by using an arbitrarily small amount of energy. It is about applying a finite amount of energy, in an infinitely small amount of time. But really it does not have to be an infinitely small amount of time if it's dictated by the length of the planck second, and that my friend is our saving grace. The fact of the planck second is how QM allows us to sidestep GR. It's all about when acceleration dominates and when it doesn't. Do you see what I am saying?

If so then it would seem clear that our entire universe is nothing more than a quantum mechanical object that is in the process of tunnelling through an energy barrier. That energy barrier being the speed of light in a higher dimensional reference frame. So you can think of us as existing in the dissallowed region, what might be called the time within time. And inside every planck second there is also a time within time.

Similarly, every photon is an alternate copy of the universe and the universe is like a giant photon. Call us the light within light. The duration of our universe is like one planck second to the higher reference frame. In technical terms, the universe is a macroscopic quantum mechanical object in a higher dimensional reference frame and that explains the big bang, and allows us to make predictions about what will really happen after the big rip.

The big rip is actually going to be called the "big reversal" for that is when the laws of thermodynamics will get thrown into reverse in an instant. Using our theory that combines QM and GR, that 180 degrees will happen when the expansion of space causes two points, seperated by only a planck distance, to begin expanding away from eachother at greater than the speed of light.

Is it just me, or are these predictions one can make by combining qm and gr? It seems to answer the questions of cosmology and gives us the theoretical means for exceeding TSOL.

If we wanted to make the acceleration threshold lower for exceeding TSOl we would only have to create a device which would electromagnetically/gravitically bend planck time. This is the concept of a warp drive and if I am not mistaken it has already been demonstrated but not taken seriously, or hidden away. What I'm talking about is things like the Marcus Device, The Searl Effect Generator, The Hamel Device, and others which are well known to those who research the very real field of little-known antigravity technology that is real and existent today.


-Field

ps. looking forward to your reply and possible validation of this theory