Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Cosmic Horizon

  1. #31
    Moderator Graybeard has a brilliant future Graybeard has a brilliant future Graybeard has a brilliant future Graybeard has a brilliant future Graybeard has a brilliant future Graybeard has a brilliant future Graybeard has a brilliant future
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    4,672
    Blog Entries
    24
    Thanks Given
    2,715
    Thanked 2,622x in 1,592 Posts
    Rep Power
    89

    Re: Cosmic Horizon

    Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie View Post
    I'm with you Greg, I also think red-blue-shifted light "reflected from objects in space could be supplying information that is incorrect regarding the objects themselves". That is why I have chosen to use the atomic decay model, to interpret the truer motions of objects in space. Of course, I mainly use it as a corrective knowledge tool, applied to red-blue-shifted light.
    Lloyd ... I don't understand this method ???? The atomic decay method ?

    The 3 ways I know of, for examining objects in space are as follows
    .
    A Light Curve

    In this scenario you would observe the apparent brightness of an object over a period of time. If the 'brightness' decreased then you could say that the object is moving away from us, the observers. Once you have a standard candle of known luminosity you can now calculate the recession speed of the object. I have never used this method myself.
    .

    .
    A Light Spectrum
    In this scenario you would observe the light spectrum of Calcium H or Calcium K of the object, and check the received electromagnetic 'barcode' against Calcium H or K heated on the lab bench. Then using the formula [math]\left\{ \lambda\prime / \lambda\circ - 1 \right\} c\circ = v [/math] . you can calculate the recession speed of the object
    This formula gives me a blueshift value for the Andromeda galaxy of 300Klm/sec towards us and for the Coma Cluster a recession (redshift) of 300,000 Klm/sec
    (sorry about the crappy formula, but I'm just learning Latex and having fun)
    .

    .
    Hubble's Constant
    in this scenario, v = Ho x d .. where there are 3.2 light years in a parsec and the value of Hubble's constant is 72 klm / sec / megaparsec
    Using this formula I got a recessional value for the Coma cluster of 7128Klm/sec
    .
    These are my own calculations, so please don't rely on them if your thinking of going there


    I understand Atomic Decay. What I don't understand is how to use it to determine the true motions of objects in space. Can you explain it ?

    cool bananas ... greg
    'Blondie says I must hate all Brunettes. I'll try, but if I can't ... I'll love them both'
    ... graffiti on Tavern wall, Pompeii, circa AD 70.

  2. #32
    Grandmaster Lloyd Gillespie is a name known to all Lloyd Gillespie is a name known to all Lloyd Gillespie is a name known to all
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    5,807
    Blog Entries
    62
    Thanks Given
    3,838
    Thanked 3,460x in 2,167 Posts
    Rep Power
    88

    Re: Cosmic Horizon

    Quote Originally Posted by Graybeard View Post
    Lloyd ... I don't understand this method ???? The atomic decay method ? I understand Atomic Decay. What I don't understand is how to use it to determine the true motions of objects in space. Can you explain it ? cool bananas ... greg
    Greg, I didn't state the radiation decay model could determine the true motions of objects in space. I stated, I used it as an additional corrective tool, to fathom redshifts/blueshifts at large distances... I stated it to you once before, in another post, but as to re-stating it another way, I'll say this...; Both quantum mechanics and the standard model predict faster rates of c, in the past. If true, then c has been slowing since some sort of point/region, or whatever... If c is slowing, then matter must be expanding. Since space is matter, it must be expanding. This is just the interpretation of mass laws of physics. Mass increases with velocity, and decreases with the slowing of velocity, yet mass increasing requires, by SR/GR, to be shrinking, sizewise, so if mass is decreasing with velocity, our present universe, then mass is expanding, sizewise. Though, I wouldn't put much money on RP's exaggerated figures. But, if mass and space are required to expand as matter decays, which it certainly is, as witnessed by stars' decay cycles, and other matter decay cycles, then the universe is over-all expanding. Now, as to accelerating, the decay model can not predict that, but my guess is, it is slightly over-all accelerating, or will, at some point in the distant future, because light will, at some point, slow more rapidly than at present, as the stars eventually burn out, unless more new stars are born, than old stars die. Yet, on an over-all perspective, a total universal decay mechanics model, can successfully predict a present expansion, by the physics laws mentioned above. As a further aside, all that radiation, as real particle waves, has to go somewhere, and since many of us agree that the universe is full of a fundamental substance, mine being fundamental photons, since that's all the final decay model shows, my theorizing shows it absolutely must expand. Of course, there's also the other school, that states "Photons don't travel through space", but the plasma fields, made of real matter, protons, electrons, neutrons, and their photons, certainly do travel, as they hit the earth, and give us the northern light show, so there are real particle/waves over-filling the space between the galaxies, etc., thus causing real expansion of space, except where the aether fields are pushing stronger from another direction, such as our local galaxie group, which is closing. IMO, it's a tremendous amount to do with the inter-galactic winds and storms, than gravity, because there seems no other explanation for some galaxies closing, while others are separating further. As another aside to this, what other explanation is there for the tail of comets, to travel away from the sun first...? To me, that's just another example of the real hydrodynamics of the em-aether field's/solar wind's direction___and obviousness... Of course, that's in dis-agreement with most standard and quantum model physics, but they offer nothing to refute the obvious, now do they...?

    There's much more I've left out, but it's posted somewhere, on this forum... Try the forum's search tool for, "radiation expansion"...

    Hope that helps,
    Lloyd
    "To develop the skill of correct thinking is in the first place to learn what you have to disregard. In order to go on, you have to know what to leave out; this is the essence of effective thinking." Kurt Godel
    "Time and space are modes in which we think and not conditions in which we live." Albert Einstein
    "The uncertainty principle is an absolute, finite, universal constant." L.G.
    "The tick-tick-tick of the caesium atom is a sliding-time-scaler constant of all finite universal motion." L.G.


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top