perpetual rainmakers

[AntonioLao]

Perpetual motion cannot exist. However, complete understanding of the physics of microburst (wet and dry) might lead to the engineering capacity of creating artificial rain. The first human rainmaker will become an instant billionaire, especially in the arid continental regions of the world where rain drops hardly ever touch the parched ground. In some places of the United States, many areas in the largest state of Texas are very good examples.

Unfortunately, researches on microburst indicate that this atmospheric anomaly has similar characteristics as tornadoes. Its life cycle is composed of three stages: downburst, outburst, and the cushion stages. Moreover, during outburst, it is always associated with strong wind shear that can topple fully grown trees within 2 kilometers radius. All things considered, the two key engineering challenges are to prevent the occurrence of the second stage of outburst and to prevent or minimize the acceleration of precipitations of the first stage of downburst. Furthermore, utilizing the reversible physics of virga occurring in dryer microburst can also help increase the amount of precipitations.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Q has forgot about the perpetual motion of our Universe...???

[AntonioLao]

Fortunately, M remembered it and Bond was assigned the dangerous secret mission to locate it. Talking to Bond over a cup of afternoon tea, he said that all we need to do is to apply Newton's 3 laws of motion and the law of universal gravitation together with the ideal gas law. There might be no need of applying laws of quantum mechanics or the uncertainty principle.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Here's a couple of very important papers, from the science archives, Antonio__relating to your work, mine, Dave's, Grahams and Tim's...

The Einstein - Lorentz Dispute Revisited...
Inertial Mass, Its Mechanics – What It Is; How It Operates

and also: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sourc...Xqzf3fqB29xoEw

[AntonioLao]

Lloyd, thanks. These papers seem to be a re-evaluation of the principle of equivalence for inertial mass and gravitational mass prior to it being successfully applied by Einstein and others in the general theory of relativity. The experimental successes of GR implicitly affirmed the existence of the aether but Einstein (maybe because of his pride) never stated explicitly that Lorentz was right if ever there was a dispute between them. On the other hand, these paper seem to validate the second part of my signature that the product of absolute acceleration and the local metric is a constant the square of light speed for mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Yeah, that's why I posted them for you. But my research of this guy seems to have a sordid history, though he is now posted on the science archives, at other times he's been banned, but that's been happening quite a bit lately, with many scientists...

Anyway, he offers some of the views that match mine, and I think many of us, here at TQ...