[mkirkpatrick]

If mind is ominipresent and we are all linked into it, all interconnected by the idea of mind, and are within a membrane, which I would call simply liquid-consciousness, or the soul-of expression, then it would follow that as a thought
arises within this membrane, it has the potential to be accessed by all the minds
that are seemingly? individual! Then this could be seen as instantanous communication, so as the idea is being formed on say earth, it could be accessed at the same say in another star system. That being so the very idea of speed, time, distance, would be totally absurd, and would be meaningless. That being so, we really have no-where to go, for we are already There!


kind regards michael.

[Guille]

We are not and can not be mentally interconnected about any idea, including the iea of mind because the ideas themselves although being equal in a qualitative manner are different quantitatively, and they are subjective to each mind, thus, they cannot be connection.

I look at it all like a database. Do you know about database programs? Well, in information and technology class we looked at them. In the database, you create tables, reports, queries, forms...And then you can go to the relationship display, and if the data given for any field in any table is the same as the data given in another field in another table, then you can make a relationship between the two. The have to be exactly equal to have a relationship. Of course, if you make a database about hurricanes and you have the field "hurricane name" in two different tables, then you can make a relationship, because the names in each are the same. But as the thoughts in eachminda re different, then our minds are different, and so are the fields of our mind, so we cannot find relationships between them.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by <<>> We are not and can not be mentally interconnected about any idea, including the iea of mind because the ideas themselves although being equal in a qualitative manner are different quantitatively, and they are subjective to each mind, thus, they cannot be connection. I look at it all like a database. Do you know about database programs? Well, in information and technology class we looked at them. In the database, you create tables, reports, queries, forms...And then you can go to the relationship display, and if the data given for any field in any table is the same as the data given in another field in another table, then you can make a relationship between the two. The have to be exactly equal to have a relationship. Of course, if you make a database about hurricanes and you have the field "hurricane name" in two different tables, then you can make a relationship, because the names in each are the same. But as the thoughts in eachminda re different, then our minds are different, and so are the fields of our mind, so we cannot find relationships between them.

Guille,Amigo,Yes I am aware of database programs,are you aware of the Head
Programmer!A mind or a soul in isolation dies-If it were possible,which of course it is not,to be isolated from the whole then you would be like the computer with the power switched off.Tottally useless,a piece of plastic trash!Without the power all things are worthless,we are all interconnected
by a common link.that link among other names is called self-consciousness and for a growing number of people-soul-awareness-which by its very nature
totally inclusive and all embracing!Our egos like to think that we are different
special,apart-from the Others,but in truth we are Not.All minds and allsouls are linked together in one homgeneous whole.
kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Michael, my thological friend, you are, oh, yes, really very confused... But I let you have your position, just to proof that we atheists aren't like those popes in previous centuries, who convinced the kills of my country to isolate it of the renaisance, then from the french revolution, and those who killed Giordano Bruno and Copernico, who trialed Galileo and who I would kill if I had the opportunity.

I jsut want to remind you soemthing:

Computer brains and not like human minds, and words are not facts or truths.

[michellemfry]

Good thing this place knows how to expand. We need the space. We are one with a whole lot of space. There is the sense, be it 6th or whatever, that it too senses. I can't count the number of little flashes that come across my mind where I feel that the universe knew I was there.
The expanding oneness of it all.

[baudrunner]

I just ran across this dicussion and I feel like revitalizing it.

Yes, Michael, we are one in a sense, sixth or otherwise.

• Carl Jung made mention of the "Universal Unconscious"
• according to quantum theory all particles can occupy the same place at the same time
• according to Philip Bucksbaum, quantum researcher at Michigan University, an infinite amount of information can be stored in a single electron
• according to my theory of light propagation, which has changed people's thinking on the subject (my TOE: Part IV), Bucksbaum's postulate is reflected in every particle in the medium wherein we see the objects around us, ie. all the atoms in the medium are modulated by the surface characteristics of the objects that we see, so this applies even if we were in a huge room with an almost infinite number of objects in it because we would see them all.

So by extension we could say that the knowledge in my brain is in yours and everybody else's, and vice versa and that there is room for an infinite amount more. Learning to tap into this knowledge is the domain of those with powerful psychic ability, something we all have the potential to be.

All the knowledge that has ever existed is out there to be understood by those with the sense to do so.

[Guille]

Saying that we are 1 is going from + to -. But nature doesn't go like that, it goes from - to +, and so I am we, that means, that for eachperson there are many different manifestations, different people which 1 is.

[baudrunner]

Saying that we are 1 is going from + to -. But nature doesn't go like that, it goes from - to +, and so I am we, that means, that for eachperson there are many different manifestations, different people which 1 is.

But we all meet the requirements of the anthropocentric Universe in that consciousness must of course be manifest, expressed as sentient awareness that could not have become just one giant infinitely sentient entity because evolution is an acellerating phenomenon and it would have grown obsolete over time. That is the real reason for corporeality.

And, insomuch as..

I will return, to the nights without sleeping, and the nights without thinking, and the nights without feeling, and the nights without dreaming... Once again

You are going from a state of + to a state of -. You imply that you believe that you will reincarnate, otherwise that quote is just so much literary bafflegab.

[Guille]

There is no background to believe in the soul or in reincarnation which youhave given, if you give it, I will study it.

Originally Posted by baudrunner You are going from a state of + to a state of -..

It's not a movement as such. It is from being just a simple human to achieving simpleness. And simpleness is a sing of intelligence (which is + than the previous stupidity of human, -).

Originally Posted by baudrunner that quote is just so much literary bafflegab.

That is exactly what it is! And exactly what I wanted others to think of it. The best ideas in life are ussually the stupid ones.

[baudrunner]

I ask you to read all my submissions in order to understand my take on spirituality. I suspect that you just read the short of things and not the long. Admittedly, I have submitted some long posts, but one can't present the TOE in just a few short paragraphs. Give them a try.