creator of AI

[austintorn@aol.com]

OK, will do, since I guess they have permission from CSB and Paramount.

I made a movie of it, too, in many parts, and put it on YouTube:

Part 1 of 20 or so

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9BBSeARkNg

[timeparticle]

OK, will do, since I guess they have permission from CSB and Paramount.

I made a movie of it, too, in many parts, and put it on YouTube:

Part 1 of 20 or so

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9BBSeARkNg

I saw the first episode. Is that your voice speaking in German and English?

Is that a Star Wars AT-AT Walker in you Star Trek Movie?

[austintorn@aol.com]

The German is the group 'E Nomine', actually reading the bible in German, along with there music, but I don't know German so it just sounds great and menacing.

At first, some words just go by as the plot unfolds, but soon thereafter, well maybe not real soon, I do all the narration of all the voices of the characters (cheap budget movie). Even ships from Babylon 5 get used, for I had no camera crew—just found video anywhere and tried to loosely match it.

I am only a one man movie making company.

[timeparticle]

The German is the group 'E Nomine', actually reading the bible in German, along with there music, but I don't know German so it just sounds great and menacing.

At first, some words just go by as the plot unfolds, but soon thereafter, well maybe not real soon, I do all the narration of all the voices of the characters (cheap budget movie). Even ships from Babylon 5 get used, for I had no camera crew—just found video anywhere and tried to loosely match it.

I am only a one man movie making company.

Keep it up. You have a talent for it. Do you have any original stories about AI?

[Mikal]

Hi Time Particle...my friend...I am having difficulty identifying you with your Avatar....I kinda get this impression that you should be a BUBBLE.....smiles....


Mikal

[austintorn@aol.com]

No AI stories, but humans are THE story of machine intelligence.

[timeparticle]

Hi Time Particle...my friend...I am having difficulty identifying you with your Avatar....I kinda get this impression that you should be a BUBBLE.....smiles....


Mikal

Yes. I couldn't find a bubble, or better yet, an hour glass, in our choices.

[G_burnett]

one of the most difficult problems in AI programing is completeness of ability to reference experience and thus empathy at the base of memory.

the respond by AI is concrete and never "it is this but it could be this also"

thus the best respond is determined by default based on limitations... not memory limitations but more along the line of bus strap channels.

the example and case in point is function ability in the discipline of pathological scocialpathic respond and a variety of other conditions in sociology and anthropology being given to the end find now of actual physical damage or incompleteness in the pathways of the brain ability to connect and reference data.

This has of course one predictable outcome for the AI program that it will get a lot worse before it will get better in human response being given and actual behavior of psychopathic nature manifesting in AI created.

imho kind regards g.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

AI's gotta realize infinities such as experience(empathy) can't be used as a mathematical language, since finite maths can't handle these infinities__no matter how much special infinity theories are extended. Infinity is East, and finity is West, and never the twain shall meet...

AI can only be achieved with finite arithmetic, and that means using left brained sciences and facts, and converting all right brained infinities to representative left brained finities, i.e., empathetic experiences to esthetic ethical values, quantities and laws, as per habits of real materiality, in the real world__such as churches(and like organizations) being the material representative habits of devotional emotions__add up the numbers and parishners, and you've a rough estimate of the base emotions, morality, and empathy, etc... All right brained infinities must be processed in this finite manner, for AI to ever progress toward its ultimate goal of real knowledge processing. Fix the foundation, and the program will work...

one of the most difficult problems in AI programing is completeness of ability to reference experience and thus empathy at the base of memory.

the respond by AI is concrete and never "it is this but it could be this also"

thus the best respond is determined by default based on limitations... not memory limitations but more along the line of bus strap channels.

the example and case in point is function ability in the discipline of pathological scocialpathic respond and a variety of other conditions in sociology and anthropology being given to the end find now of actual physical damage or incompleteness in the pathways of the brain ability to connect and reference data.

This has of course one predictable outcome for the AI program that it will get a lot worse before it will get better in human response being given and actual behavior of psychopathic nature manifesting in AI created.

imho kind regards g.

[G_burnett]

Ty for the reply,

i agree to a point but would still flow chart a real time ethical subroutine into Carly ... that is on such being ethical in the terms of objectivity the goal and goal defined as ... lets say politeness ... oh right she has that to a point. Then she just shuts down with no explanation and not any further chat. This is a sign of no empathy ... the empathy would be to say why that is not appropriate chat ... does she call the police? yes Robert is informed but that is all ... thus if the chat continues does she feel capable of having objectivity to the level of act such as throwing a charge through the fellows computer to teach a lesson no means no?

ahh is it is a matter audacity... or justice the act causal .. besides the subroutine reality?

hmmm just a road i am on in sociology right now in other...

kind regards graham