multitasking

[mkirkpatrick]

Does this format contain the whole number zero? If it does then it won't agree with Hadamard elements.

No it does not,what it contains is as yet unimaginal!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

what it contains is as yet unimaginal

Not even cardinal nor ordinal?

[mkirkpatrick]

Not even cardinal nor ordinal?

Well if you put it that way,i guess so!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Well if you put it that way,i guess so!

Just making distinctions among imaginize, numerize, realize, quantize, qualitize, etc.

[mkirkpatrick]

Just making distinctions among imaginize, numerize, realize, quantize, qualitize, etc.

Within the black-light it's polar opposite the pure white light beckons us ever onward
and deeper into form.


regards michael,

[AntonioLao]

Within the black-light it's polar opposite the pure white light

In a Venn diagram the white is represented by a circle and the black is also represented by another disjointed circle. They could touch at one contact point. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venn_diagram

[everymansmedium]

Hello:
Multitasking may be an efficient way to use resources, but it is a hindrance to creating a true thinking machine. When creating a thinking machine in a multitasking environment you must have a way of indicating that the sequence of events is not violated. This became a problem to my best system. It worked well until it was networked, then it did many unpredictable things because the multitasking system began to interfere with the sequence of events in the program. It required a rewrite using a system to insure sequencing of events. The multitasking becomes very useful when the system is running its sequence of events correctly while being able to issue tasks to parallel perifial systems.

The thinking machine is a sequence of tasks.
John

[AntonioLao]

Multitasking may be an efficient way to use resources

Only because the data structures in digital computers is one dimensional. Higher dimensional data structures, if I'm not mistaken, still do not exist.

[everymansmedium]

Only because the data structures in digital computers is one dimensional. Higher dimensional data structures, if I'm not mistaken, still do not exist.

I am sure that they do exist, however I feel that man experiences a single dimensional existence and to simulate the same kind of consciousness will result in a sequential thought process. There may well be a consciousness that exists within a higher dimension than this. I do think that this existence would be of a divine nature. At least well beyond what we are. I would guess that only one of this type of consciousness exists. Also that it is likely to be a collective consciousness.
John

[AntonioLao]

I am sure that they do exist

However, most exist in the abstract sense. What I have in mind are the following abstract data types (ADT): 1. Associative array. 2. complex number. 3. class. 4. deque 5. list. 6. multimap 7. priority queue 8. queue 9. set 10. stack. 11 string 12 tree.