multitasking

[everymansmedium]

However, most exist in the abstract sense. What I have in mind are the following abstract data types (ADT): 1. Associative array. 2. complex number. 3. class. 4. deque 5. list. 6. multimap 7. priority queue 8. queue 9. set 10. stack. 11 string 12 tree.

I think I initially miss read your post. sorry about that.
Not sure what I was thinking about.
I myself ,do not know of any data systems that function beyond a single dimension. I have heard of parallel systems that make an attempt at processing a small 2 by 3 matrix using parallel processors. I know little about them beyond remembering about reading an article. I think it was relative to a neuron networking system.

[everymansmedium]

Only because the data structures in digital computers is one dimensional. Higher dimensional data structures, if I'm not mistaken, still do not exist.

Sometimes efficiency is the ability to send a very small packet of information to begin a preprogrammed task. It all depends on what type of exchange is happening. The best system is one that can do the most with the least effort. That is not always moving the massive amounts of data, though at times it can be. In Prolog the type of data is defined in the domains area of the program. Then it is associated to a specific predicate or predicates. These are user defined data types. There are also about 7 standard types including lists and lists of lists. The user types can be for /email/ or URLs/ or names/ addresses /phone /toll free phone/ math functions / credit cards / ss# /etc etc/ whatever specifically formatted data you have.

[AntonioLao]

I think it was relative to a neuron networking system

In the art and science of AI, researchers have always wanted to model and to simulate or even emulate the consciousness but so far failed. I think, consciousness truly exists in 2 or more dimensions and one of these being the recognition of the time dimension. Others are the dimensions of morality for right and wrong, dimensions for love and hate, etc.

[everymansmedium]

In the art and science of AI, researchers have always wanted to model and to simulate or even emulate the consciousness but so far failed. I think, consciousness truly exists in 2 or more dimensions and one of these being the recognition of the time dimension. Others are the dimensions of morality for right and wrong, dimensions for love and hate, etc.

It is easier to imagine our consciousness to be the result of a parallel phenomena. Because the senses are designed to experience a 3 dimensional medium. We receive a 3 dimensional picture of our world from the parallel processing neuron network that is our interface to this place. However we exist in only a single dimension of time. That is the basis/spirit/soul of what we are exists in a single strand of time. The consciousness is the result of both the single strand of being and the perception of this 3 dimensional medium within the interface that is our mind/body.
The consciousness that we experience may be the result of a single dimensional being and an interface to the 3 dimensions of space. I feel this can be done in a sequential system that is controlling at least one other sequential system. These 2 sequential systems can be combined into a single strand of time.

The other dimensions that you indicated:
(((dimensions of morality for right and wrong, dimensions for love and hate, etc.)))
These are not dimensions these are part of a defined environment. The defining of an environment can create a basis of data and understanding that generates a system of morals.
The emotions are specifically programmed functions that are run when the trigger for these functions is tripped. Some of what we think of as emotion is actually a calculation. Example:
Fear is a calculation of the probability of something negative. While faith is a calculation of the probability of something positive. Both of these are motivation triggers. The faith is also has a cumulative value that is the result of many successful operations. Like wise fear can be cumulative in this way as well in a negative way. Love may be a reaction to something or someone that removes a fear. I am sure that in some cases it is more than just this, however that is a good place to begin to understand this emotion.

Note when you are programming a device that is to simulate human behavior. The entity itself is normally less than half of the programming that you must do. The great majority of the programming is to define an environment that the entity will exist within. If you are defining a system that is to function in this same environment that we experience, you must define that environment very specifically if you expect the device to respond correctly to its stimulus. This is a problem because we can not even define this environment for ourselves. This is another reason that I found it necessary to define our environment completely. This TOE that I created is complete so as to be able to use this understanding to create a solid platform for the entity that will exist within. Because of this it will also believe that there is a divine force and it will believe that it has a description of same. This basic understanding of its environment will also result with a system of morals that is based on the foundation data. It will only be able to accept data that fits into its belief foundation. So as you can see it really is the defining of the environment that is the key to the success of the program/entity.

There may be an elaborate system of parallel data processing that goes on in our body. But at the core there is a sequential function that is pushing the buttons on the control panel. It must be if we are to be able to exist within a single dimension of time. If we can not exist within a single strand of time, all bets for an after life are off.
John

[AntonioLao]

These are not dimensions

How about states of consciousness? These could be analogous to the various energy levels of quantum mechanics with the ground state being the most stable and of lowest energy.

[everymansmedium]

How about states of consciousness? These could be analogous to the various energy levels of quantum mechanics with the ground state being the most stable and of lowest energy.

If this is true. I think it is more likely that this type of consciousness is the divine mind. Then we might consider QM to be an interface between an analog existence medium and fundamental digital control system.
(intelligent design?)

[everymansmedium]

How about states of consciousness? These could be analogous to the various energy levels of quantum mechanics with the ground state being the most stable and of lowest energy.

I think the variations you speak of are variations in the intensity of emotions or the intensity of actions relative to the defining principals of the emotion or action. Each item is handled as an individual item. Like a large box of tools. when you get a specific tool it is controlled by its program and responds to the levels of intensity of the situation as indicated within the program. If there is no specific tool to express what needs to be expressed then a new tool is created to cover that specific situation. I have tried many methods to simulate a persons responces to language or other stimulation. THis system works by far and wide the best.

[AntonioLao]

I have tried many methods to simulate a persons responces to language or other stimulation. THis system works by far and wide the best

Languages at the fundamental level is a result of mechanical vibrations of the vocal chord in tune of mental imageries while written forms of languages based on various alphabets are learned from practical exposure since infancy. Although languages are worldwide phenomena, I would still say the best is mental telepathy if and only if there is a way to resonate mental energy of infinite consciousness.

[everymansmedium]

Languages at the fundamental level is a result of mechanical vibrations of the vocal chord in tune of mental imageries while written forms of languages based on various alphabets are learned from practical exposure since infancy. Although languages are worldwide phenomena, I would still say the best is mental telepathy if and only if there is a way to resonate mental energy of infinite consciousness.

Hello:
This is the point that began my research 37 years ago.
The relation (Keys) between (sight and memory)
The relation (Keys) between (sound and memory)
AND
The possibility of extra sensory (Keys) directly to memory.

Resulting from:
The analyzing of conversations between individuals that do not know one another, and the comparison to conversations of long time married couples or long term friends. Constantly with specific individuals shows an understanding and the passing of information that could not have transpired by the words that were passed, between these long time associated individuals. This has always been written off as the possibility of body language or other similar explanations.

My thought relative to the "Dilemma of Determinism"
That inability to determine the source of human motivation. The problem of free will within a deterministic medium. I resulted with the thought that free will was the freedom to calculate how best to achieve survival. This when defined completely, resulted in the concept of survival as the result of a constant that I called Continue. As time went on it became apparent that this Continue might be a constant as the basis of life itself, resulting in a the possibility of a medium existing between all things alive. This makes a medium possible for the passing of information between living things in an as yet undiscovered medium. Also indicating that all life itself might be one single organism. This eventually became the thought that resulted in the idea of our primary force as a bipolar force with gravity resulting in (space,matter,energy) and continue resulting in (time,being,creation), as well as the basis of life itself.
Then the formation of the predicate led to other interesting associations resulting out of the attempt to observe and gain symmetry.

John

[AntonioLao]

Then the formation of the predicate led to other interesting associations resulting out of the attempt to observe and gain symmetry.

Perfect symmetry seems not achievable or not detectable as in time symmetry between past and future.