multitasking

[everymansmedium]

Perfect symmetry seems not achievable or not detectable as in time symmetry between past and future.

Hello:
Yes you are correct about time not being symmetrical. If it was and we could identify the symmetry, we could predict the future relative to this symmetry even though the future does not exist.

This however is not the symmetry that I was talking about. When I found that there was the possibility of a new way to look at the foundation of life and of the universe itself. I tried to describe the environment that I was finding to the Prolog computer system. In order to do this, it is necessary to build a predicate that describes the concept environment as I saw it forming because of this track of thought that I was following.
I tried many way to do this. Some of what I found was to describe a bipolar primary force as it was seen did not work at first because there was no symmetry between the poles of the force. It was quite obvious that a bipolar force must have symmetry between the poles. But under present observation there was none. So there was a choice to discard all that seemed so very productive, or to find a way to achieve symmetry.

pole1(gravity(space,matter,energy))3,pole2(continu e(time,being,creation))1

There is no symmetry in this predicate.
This brought me to a halt in this area for quite a number of years until I read about string theory and M theory. My thought was that extra dimensions could result with symmetry and make the bipole a possibility. When following the work that was happening, I found many theories for 2, 4 dimensional systems with 2,3,and 4 dimensional interfaces resulting in 10, 11, and 12 dimension systems. All thought to be a rational way to achieve symmetry.
So my work in this area began again as I was doing before but now I found it a reasonable choice to add dimensions so as to achieve symmetry in the predicate that I was forming.
My result was as follows:

Membrane(bipole(universe1(side(gravity(space,matte r,energy)3)2),
(edge(continue(time,being,creation)1)1)),
(universe2(side(continue(time,being,creation)3)2),
(edge(gravity(space,matter,energy)1)1)))


This predicate now shows a single membrane with 2 existence mediums that are mirror images of each other resulting with symmetry between the poles of a bipolar force.

If you compare the relation of matter to energy as E=mc2 also to being and creation, a most amazing thought emerges from the observance of symmetry of this predicate.
On the time side of the bipole this symmetry indicates that being =creation This is to say that the future does not exist. The point of creation is NOW. Thus free will does exist and is the decision process preceding individual creation.

There is also the possibility of a 3 dimensional being because of 3 dimensional time in the alternate existence medium. The same relation for this being results with being = creation times c2 That sounds very much like “let there be light.” I do not know about you but this observance made me rethink my ideas of religion. It also coincidentally appears as the trinity as the basis of life. True this is all coincidental, but it is enough to keep it in my mind continuously . There is just too many coincidences to ignore it. Even though my initial thought was to define an environment for a robot system. I think it is going to end up as a bit more than that.
John

[AntonioLao]

I tried to describe the environment that I was finding to the Prolog computer system.

I'm now investigating PROLOG as a computer high level programming that is distinctively without using numbers but pure logic. I'm doing it in order to relate this to the study of consciousness.

[everymansmedium]

I'm now investigating PROLOG as a computer high level programming that is distinctively without using numbers but pure logic. I'm doing it in order to relate this to the study of consciousness.

Hi Antonio:
I think you may find the activity of learning Prolog a very fruitful experience. I picked up a copy of Turbo Prolog version 1.1 back in 1986 or maybe 87. I have not been able to put it down sense.
John.

[AntonioLao]

I picked up a copy of Turbo Prolog version 1.1 back in 1986 or maybe 87

I better get at it since I have 21 years to catch up to your level of expertise.

[everymansmedium]

I better get at it since I have 21 years to catch up to your level of expertise.

It can be used as a declarative language. But it can also be used to create procedures as well. It can be used as a platform for pure logic. But it is also a good language to define equations. You can define an equation as a predicate as well as the meow of your favorite cat can be put into a predicate. It can even generate a system of animation by pulling images out of a data base. It is much harder to find things that it can not do, than things that it can do. It is as good as your imagination. Also using it tends to exercise your imagination. I think I am better in this area because of my activities with this wonderful system.
I will be back to talk Monday. Till then I dance and dance and dance some more. The dance convention in Myrtle beach this week end. Ya hoo!!!
John.