[AntonioLao]

In computer science, this term is part of network designs. In mathematics, it is a one-to-many correspondence mapping relation between the domain and the range. Therefore, its utility is the converse of its functionality. The strict rule of functionality should indicate a many-to-one correspondence as represented by many people solving one TOE instead of many TOEs solve by one person alone. On the other hand, a chaotic network topology would suggest a many-to-many correspondence represented by many people solving many TOEs all at once. This is the same as when everyone starts to act and talk simultaneously which would be hard-pressed for an unsuspecting bystander making sense out the chatters, hustles, and bustles.

It could then be said that human intelligence is based on one-to-one functional relation while artificial intelligence could possibly work with many-to-many correspondence relation.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao In computer science, this term is part of network designs. In mathematics, it is a one-to-many correspondence mapping relation between the domain and the range. Therefore, its utility is the converse of its functionality. The strict rule of functionality should indicate a many-to-one correspondence as represented by many people solving one TOE instead of many TOEs solve by one person alone. On the other hand, a chaotic network topology would suggest a many-to-many correspondence represented by many people solving many TOEs all at once. This is the same as when everyone starts to act and talk simultaneously which would be hard-pressed for an unsuspecting bystander making sense out the chatters, hustles, and bustles. It could then be said that human intelligence is based on one-to-one functional relation while artificial intelligence could possibly work with many-to-many correspondence relation.

Maybe with the internet,and in particular with this forum,we can all put our minds together
and hopefully solve the toe.

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Maybe with the internet,and in particular with this forum,we can all put our minds togetherand hopefully solve the toe.

Subjectively doable but objectively difficult.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Subjectively doable but objectively difficult.

Is that not the way with most things?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Is that not the way with most things?

The most powerful computer is still limited by the size of its registers. Infinite size registers do not exist in digital format.

[theunify]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao The most powerful computer is still limited by the size of its registers. Infinite size registers do not exist in digital format.

But the registers are exponential; perhaps if we banned computer use for 100 years, then let everybody in on the most efficient technology produced "underground" this would solve our problems.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao The most powerful computer is still limited by the size of its registers. Infinite size registers do not exist in digital format.

Our minds have access to a universal computer,that is boundless and absolute.
all we have to do is access it,and ask the question!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick ask the question

In digital format? Or in analog format?

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao In digital format? Or in analog format?

Neither,it is in black-light format ?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick it is in black-light format

Does this format contain the whole number zero? If it does then it won't agree with Hadamard elements.