multitasking

[AntonioLao]

In computer science, this term is part of network designs. In mathematics, it is a one-to-many correspondence mapping relation between the domain and the range. Therefore, its utility is the converse of its functionality. The strict rule of functionality should indicate a many-to-one correspondence as represented by many people solving one TOE instead of many TOEs solve by one person alone. On the other hand, a chaotic network topology would suggest a many-to-many correspondence represented by many people solving many TOEs all at once. This is the same as when everyone starts to act and talk simultaneously which would be hard-pressed for an unsuspecting bystander making sense out the chatters, hustles, and bustles.

It could then be said that human intelligence is based on one-to-one functional relation while artificial intelligence could possibly work with many-to-many correspondence relation.

[mkirkpatrick]

In computer science, this term is part of network designs. In mathematics, it is a one-to-many correspondence mapping relation between the domain and the range. Therefore, its utility is the converse of its functionality. The strict rule of functionality should indicate a many-to-one correspondence as represented by many people solving one TOE instead of many TOEs solve by one person alone. On the other hand, a chaotic network topology would suggest a many-to-many correspondence represented by many people solving many TOEs all at once. This is the same as when everyone starts to act and talk simultaneously which would be hard-pressed for an unsuspecting bystander making sense out the chatters, hustles, and bustles.

It could then be said that human intelligence is based on one-to-one functional relation while artificial intelligence could possibly work with many-to-many correspondence relation.

Maybe with the internet,and in particular with this forum,we can all put our minds together
and hopefully solve the toe.

regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Maybe with the internet,and in particular with this forum,we can all put our minds togetherand hopefully solve the toe.

Subjectively doable but objectively difficult.

[mkirkpatrick]

Subjectively doable but objectively difficult.

Is that not the way with most things?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Is that not the way with most things?

The most powerful computer is still limited by the size of its registers. Infinite size registers do not exist in digital format.

[theunify]

The most powerful computer is still limited by the size of its registers. Infinite size registers do not exist in digital format.

But the registers are exponential; perhaps if we banned computer use for 100 years, then let everybody in on the most efficient technology produced "underground" this would solve our problems.

[mkirkpatrick]

The most powerful computer is still limited by the size of its registers. Infinite size registers do not exist in digital format.

Our minds have access to a universal computer,that is boundless and absolute.
all we have to do is access it,and ask the question!



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

ask the question

In digital format? Or in analog format?

[mkirkpatrick]

In digital format? Or in analog format?

Neither,it is in black-light format ?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

it is in black-light format

Does this format contain the whole number zero? If it does then it won't agree with Hadamard elements.