Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  Very informative and useful, John. I also went to your sites and noticed something about 11/11/11...and that you're a very religious individual.
Is there any connection between that and the singularity of the zero-dimensional node? |
The number 11 is something that just keeps getting in my face it seems like it is always there. It is the coincidental occurrence that tends to make me play the trend in place of playing the odds. It is also the number of dimensions that I feel is within the multiverse.
The dimensionless singularity of now is simply a look at the fact that the universe is of a size that is controlled by the time it takes the fastest of it motions to move across the total space available, in the most time that it appears to have available. this makes both time and space always comparable.
This dimensionless point becomes a dimension that is able to cover the expanse of the universe.
That seen as a single frame for in the next moment there is a new now and the old one is past creation and data.
So whatever we measure is valid only now. For in the next moment we have a new frame with all of the measurements still being the same. The size does not change even though expansion is indicated. It begins to look like a single frame out of a great movie where creation is the source of each new frame, and taking place at every conceivable point at every conceivable instance.
We talk about the expansion of space, but picture it as the result of a small bit of expansion spread all over the range of space, yet resulting in no increase in size.
What I see is not that different except that it happens here and now from the center (every point of observation is a center) outward.
The creation as it happens is time and space, the point is every conceivable point in space and every conceivable instance in time. Every now is a new frame of existence. The center is everywhere and there is no edge or end.
Because time travels outward from every conceivable point in every conceivable direction. No matter what way you go it is always in the same direction as time. It is also always toward the red shift. This is the tendency of the more basic direction of the underlying membrane that only has the one direction that you can travel in, that direction that both time and space travel in toward the macro/redshift/past
The picture that I have is totally coherent and logical it however must be seen as a total with all of its coincidences to see the value. In every way appears to coincide with probabilities expectations as well.
My work lies only in devising a way to show what I see in a way that it will be understood the way that I understand it.
John
About the religious aspect of my drive: When I began this I was a catholic turned agnostic. The only reason that I did not use the term atheist is because I do not feel that it is properly translated from the Greek. The feelings that I have now are the result of an experience that I wish I could share with you. However the only thing that I would be able to give you is a collection of words that would amount to no more than hearsay after I gave it to you.
An experience is of an absolute nature. Passing information about an experience is just a collection of words. It does not begin to convey what the experience was meant to do.
I do plan to completely document this departure from the mainstream that resulted in not only a single experience but an on going sequence of events. Some of the signs of this exist within my writing. This because I removed most so as to stop the tendency to catalog me as unstable when I first began to openly talk about this subject.
In all actuality my stability now is a steady state for more than 20 years since I first had my work documented by the library of congress in 1987. I had 2 documents that year. one was Unit Unity Community the other was called Iscando. The iscando is a computer language based on auxiliary verbs.
John
Linear Mode
