It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Assume it to be true
Reload this Page Energy is Matter
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Energy is Matter
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
Energy is Matter - 01-16-2006, 07:16 AM

Assume that Energy is Matter. Both things are exactly the same, E=M. But don't be confused, I don't mean mass, I mean matter. So your body is energy.

How would the world be?
What would the assumption impply?
Would the laws of thermodynamics still work?

As the particles of matter cannot be destroyed, then I believe that the laws of thermodynamics still would work.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
hmmm....
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Question hmmm.... - 01-16-2006, 11:33 AM

so if energy equals matter, your thoughts would be matter?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
A rose by any other name.
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,734
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
A rose by any other name. - 01-16-2006, 11:38 AM

In this analogy it is just as correct to say M=mc^2 as it is to say E=mc^2. These only define the state of the substance.
Of course this is also assuming that "matter" and "energy" are referring to the fundamental essence of a fundamental physical entity. Thus a rose by any other name.
The current problem is that science today is interpreted as though energy and matter are referring to two autonomous entities just as they view the forces of nature as being individual autonomous forces of nature, each with their own attributes and properties.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-16-2006, 12:38 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
so if energy equals matter, your thoughts would be matter?
Yes. photons would be matter (thus light) and so would be any manifestation of energy, even sound! (this one would be strange to think of, it would be the vibrations of particles would be particles itself)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Banned
subversion is on a distinguished roadsubversion is on a distinguished road
 
subversion's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 562
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 3x in 3 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2005
Rep Power: 0
   
01-16-2006, 12:39 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by <<>>
But don't be confused, I don't mean mass, I mean matter.
what's the difference (according to gravity)?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-16-2006, 12:40 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by dleviwing
In this analogy it is just as correct to say M=mc^2 as it is to say E=mc^2. These only define the state of the substance.
Of course this is also assuming that "matter" and "energy" are referring to the fundamental essence of a fundamental physical entity. Thus a rose by any other name.
The current problem is that science today is interpreted as though energy and matter are referring to two autonomous entities just as they view the forces of nature as being individual autonomous forces of nature, each with their own attributes and properties.
I agree. There can be no energy without matter, and if there is matter, there is energy.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-16-2006, 12:42 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by subversion
what's the difference (according to gravity)?
Gravity bends spacetime due to mass, not due to matter. There is a concept that we call density, maybe you've heard about it. If you ahve, you will know that there can be a lot of matter but little mass, and vice versa. And if they are not equal in quantity they can't be the same thing! (and being equal in quantity is only the start requisite for being the same thing)
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
2nd degree Black Belt
Mr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura aboutMr. Nobody has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 292
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 18x in 17 Posts
Join Date: Jun 2005
Rep Power: 15
   
01-16-2006, 07:15 PM

The fundamental particle is the description of a matter (energy) wave. Particles do not have a reality on their own, they do not have a size nor occupy space. The particle does not represent a thing but the information of location/ momentum/ spin and so on.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
The process of gravity
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,734
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
The process of gravity - 01-16-2006, 07:27 PM

Gravity as a force must also be of substance. The state of the substance of space is being acted on by the substance that constitutes physical structure and thus producing an interaction collapsing the wave function of space to the wavelengths produced by structured substances. This produces an effect as if space where being absorbed by structured substance (the phenomena of spacetime, the motions of space.)


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-16-2006, 07:49 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Nobody
The fundamental particle is the description of a matter (energy) wave. Particles do not have a reality on their own, they do not have a size nor occupy space. The particle does not represent a thing but the information of location/ momentum/ spin and so on.
This is--I believe--the main error of physicists ever. It is the most clear principle, the only unique metaphysical proposition on which philosophers agree, that an Entity has Properties. This means that if there are properties such as momentum, spin, location... There msut be an entity that has them. Particles must exist. If particles are not spatially extended, the don't exist! Don't you se,e existence itself is being on space and time! You do agree that particles are extended in time, they started at some point and will stop existing at another point (by decay). So just like that, they are spatially extended.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Singularity As Separate Entity Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 11 02-08-2008 12:15 PM
The Young's Experiment humanbydefault Philosophy Articles 1 05-20-2007 08:00 AM
Rediscovering the Atomic Model (Part One) humanbydefault Physics Articles 1 04-02-2006 05:48 PM
Rearrangement of physic's foundation Duane Ertle Cosmology 41 02-17-2006 02:27 PM
The Shape of the Universe Mohsen Cosmology Articles 2 05-26-2005 01:19 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com