It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Assume it to be true
Reload this Page 96% of the universe is missing!
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
96% of the universe is missing!
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile 96% of the universe is missing! - 02-09-2006, 06:46 PM

I have just watched a t.v.program here in england on the bbc channel called
horizon,and in the program,it was claimed that science thinks that 96% of
the universe is missing,at first they said,that they had found dark matter,and
that this explained the shortfall of energy,this was then pushed to one side
in favour of dark energy,anyone know the difference?Please explain if you do.
There was also mention of top scientist becoming like modern day priests,
each preaching there own doctrine,what do you fellow toe-questers think,
I would be grateful for your input.

kind regards michael


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Master
michellemfry will become famous soon enoughmichellemfry will become famous soon enoughmichellemfry will become famous soon enough
 
michellemfry's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 620
Thanks Given: 1
Thanked 4x in 4 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2005
Rep Power: 16
   
Cool 02-09-2006, 07:17 PM

I'm sure someone else can explain it better, but I thought it was based on the observed velocities of galaxies. For the observed velocities, a certain amount of mass is thought to be required to account for the integrity of the galaxy at that speed. But when we compare it to the known mass of the universe, a gaping hole opens up. We look and are not able to observe the mass in normal baryonic matter, protons and neutrons. This is one of those situations that causes even the most centered individual to wildly speculate and wonder. Is what we know about the fundamentals really valid? How can the effects of the mass be there, but no particles found? The best description at present is missing mass. At present, the universe is awfully quiet about it's capabilities. Kind of fun, isn't it?


Michelle
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
02-10-2006, 02:18 AM

The missing mass/energy is supposed to be dark matter and dark energy. But I believe we can explain it in terms of force carriers. I believe there is a sort of vortex that allows gravitons to leave universes and enter them. The do this freely. The same amount that leaves, comes in, and vice versa. Principle of conservation of energy. There might be parts of the universe where there are these vortex of gravitons, and these are free of mass, yet 'create' the gravity.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
4% is accounted for,so we are all safe?
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,204
Thanks Given: 334
Thanked 621x in 593 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 90
   
Smile 4% is accounted for,so we are all safe? - 02-10-2006, 08:37 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by <<>>
The missing mass/energy is supposed to be dark matter and dark energy. But I believe we can explain it in terms of force carriers. I believe there is a sort of vortex that allows gravitons to leave universes and enter them. The do this freely. The same amount that leaves, comes in, and vice versa. Principle of conservation of energy. There might be parts of the universe where there are these vortex of gravitons, and these are free of mass, yet 'create' the gravity.
I think you may havea point there,will look further into this idea.


regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Orange Belt
trombonetom is on a distinguished road
 
trombonetom's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep Power: 0
   
04-02-2006, 03:55 AM

A certain amout of non-baryonic (dark) matter of energy to provide galaxies with enough gravity to keep them together and in orbit around the central point.
At several points in TOEquest it is mentioned that enery is extremely similar to matter (and possibly matter is just energy slowed down).
Therefore, they are either almost the same thing; or they are the same.

Either way we do not need to worry about the difference between the two because that difference is very small.

Do you see my thinking?

Tell me if you have a different idea
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
energy...matter...
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
Blue Belt
Unreal Zelta is on a distinguished roadUnreal Zelta is on a distinguished road
 
Unreal Zelta's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 109
Thanks Given: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Join Date: Mar 2006
Rep Power: 10
   
energy...matter... - 04-02-2006, 04:17 AM

Trom,
I agree with you, matter is only a form of energy. But, not energy itself. In other words, the linear equation Matter=Energy is not true. It the same as for, air=oxygen, that's only partly true, because, air consists of other gases (nitrogen, carbon dioxide and so on). SO, matter consists of energy (perhaps 96% of it) and the other 4% is human imagination or other forms of manipulative factors.

Best regards

Zelta


"Science is organized knowledge. Wisdom is organized life"

"But although all our knowledge begins with experience, it does not follow that it arises from experience."

"Happiness is not an ideal of reason, but of imagination."

Immanuel Kant
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Good point
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Orange Belt
trombonetom is on a distinguished road
 
trombonetom's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Thanks Given: 0
Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
Join Date: Apr 2006
Rep Power: 0
   
Good point - 04-02-2006, 04:34 AM

That is a good way of looking at it, I like that
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
Brown Belt
HappytheStripper is on a distinguished roadHappytheStripper is on a distinguished road
 
HappytheStripper's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 170
Thanks Given: 7
Thanked 7x in 7 Posts
Join Date: Dec 2005
Rep Power: 11
   
04-03-2006, 07:53 PM

Another way of looking at dark matter and dark energy is: You know the stories we tell every day as a "matter" of fact.... then we go into great datail to tell this story... the detail that connects this story together can be veiwed as "energy".... being like the threads that hold this matter together to complete the story.... the view of dark or light depends on the story we are wishing to tell... and others perception of.... in much the same way we do here at toequest.... however that is only my perception.... simple I thought.... as it is the story of the universe we are trying to write....

Although 96% of what we dont know is maybe only because our perception will not allow us.... allowing for only 4% of the information to be contained within society at any one given moment.... gives us a rather narrow minded view.


The fundamental method of philosophy is the use of reasoning to evaluate arguments concerning these questions ..
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
6th degree Black Belt
harmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enoughharmonygirl will become famous soon enough
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 844
Thanks Given: 43
Thanked 15x in 15 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2006
Rep Power: 18
   
Cool 04-03-2006, 09:29 PM

Well said, HTS!


The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
What's missing? Is there an inventory?
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Observer
dleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nicedleviwing is just really nice
 
dleviwing's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 1,734
Thanks Given: 15
Thanked 130x in 111 Posts
Join Date: Jan 2005
Rep Power: 33
   
What's missing? Is there an inventory? - 04-03-2006, 10:39 PM

I am still confused as to what exactly is missing from the universe; Mass, Matter, or energy? Seeing as science really do not know what the numbers for "Mass" really mean (Richard Feynman), how can we presume to say anything is missing until we truly know what we are talking about. There is no true quantitative measure of the physical stuff of the universe. I think some scientists are doing some tail chasing.


David
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Singularity As Separate Entity Mohsen TOE Theory Articles 11 02-08-2008 12:15 PM
Countability of space time curvature and the probability of the universe TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 4 12-13-2006 12:54 PM
The Universe is a Markov Chain TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 3 02-02-2006 09:03 PM
The probability of the universe TinyTree TOE Theory Articles 6 10-30-2005 08:04 AM
The Shape of the Universe Mohsen Cosmology Articles 2 05-26-2005 01:19 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com