stability question of proton and electron

[AntonioLao]

If protons and electrons become free from the bounding of atoms and left alone without any interaction then both live forever. On the other hand, a free neutron released from the nuclear bounding of atoms will decay into a proton, an electron, and its antineutrino in about 12 minutes. Although the electron is considered as an elementary particle both proton and neutron are composite particles made of elementary particles called quarks. Furthermore, by the principle of isotopic symmetry both proton and neutron are considered as identical twin among subatomic particles. Therefore, the billion dollar question is why free proton is stable but free neutron is not?

One of many superficial answers would be because a neutron is slightly heavier than a proton. But a more plausible answer is because there are a minimum mass configuration for free particles to exist independently in the spacetime continuum. Understanding this minimum mass configuration will indirectly provide a means of creating a successful cold fusion reaction.

[analog]

Hi Antonio,

I can only speak from my paradigm views, but my conjecture would be that the continuum has properties of wave mechanics whereby all particles are compressionally bound rather than internally bound by 'forces'. The properties of such a continuum, in terms of frequency and wavelength of the unstructured transverse waves within it which account for such 'forces' steadily decay to longer wavelength less frequent waves with the observable expansion of 'space', whereby a structured particle is like a core sample which we take from the Earth to study climate changes and environmental factors chronologically frozen within the sample the further down the sample we look. Structured matter is the same way IMHO, whereby the inner domain of unstructured transverse wave interactions per frequency and wavelength are representative of the state of the continuum at the time of which they were formed whereby always containing higher frequency shorter wavelength internal interactions bound by the lower frequency longer wavelength interactions of the external environment which they're within by means of the greater quantity of external waves interacting at the structures domain. Composite structures such as the proton and nuetron are better examples of such than the electron due to their entire composition being the mechanics by which lower frequency waves can actually compress and bind the high frequency short wavelength strong force domain of the quarks within them, whereby their progressively lower frequency internal wave function is bound by wave pressure of the continuum along with their EM wavelength interactions with electrons. The entire mechanics of compressional waves actually sets the scale for fusion and fission whereby the properties of the continuum itself establishes the threshold by which structural stabilty is accounted whereby we see the decay of the neutron back to the proton with emission of the more stable electron, etc, along with the loss of fusion capability by the spatial medium itself early on in the BB model or beginning of cycle in my views where spatial density was high enough to account for such, whereby now we only find such mechanics in the cores of massive stars and possibly black holes whereby the gravitationally compressed system increases medium density thus bringing the transverse frequency of the continuum back high enough to overcome the seperation of structured particles due to their reflection of these same waves which establishes the distances by which they can be compressed thus also accounting for the 'force' we see at play per frequency of wave interaction between constituents at such resolution whereby allowing such fusion, with fission being a result of the state change once the threshold equilibrium of medium to structure is overcome due to an internal imbalance of increased wave pressure outward as with adding structured mass to internal systems.

Here's a crude model I posted for Lloyd the other day, http://www.toequest.com/forum/theory...tml#post124645 and I even made mention of my thoughts on cold fusion in short detail, but Imho, being as we're dealing with a compressional continuum IMO, it's a similar mechanic to the role of pressure relative to state changes from solid to liquid to gas per boiling temperature, which we are more familiar with. Heat is merely the state of the random motion component of a system, which is the state of transverse waves per frequency and wavelength. Cold fusion would be trying to overcome the balance of internal and external wave mechanics of structured matter vs the continuum or the higher frequency atmosphere (relative to the continuum) built from manipulation of the continuum through structural interaction and the ability for larger systems to raise spatial density. We know that lasers can create Bose Einstein condensates which should be representations of higher frequency states of the spatial medium between sodium atoms, so they could play a part in the method of aligning the internal wave frequencies of the medium to matching frequencies and harmonics by manipulating the vibration frequency of atoms whereby wave condensation thus amplification to shorter wavelength higher frequency waves takes place as we witness spatial condensation, which is closer to the initial spatial state which originally allowed for the structuring of quarks and such and their further fusion to make protons and neutrons which were fused together to make larger atoms etc. until spatial density had decreased too far by way of expansion/wave frequency decay to allow for such. The question always remains of whether the cost of energy in all its conserved forms which it would take to duplicate the conditions required for fusion would be greater than the release of free energy which we would further use. The system merely took advantage of spatial density early on in the spatial decay cycle of the continuum, and now exploits the accumulation of mass as with a star to bring spatial density thus also transverse frequency back to such conditions due to progressively stepping up the lower frequency gravitational waves back up to higher frequency waves as they are deflected inward towards the core by way of gravitational compression. Stars are similar to our concepts of electrical transformers which step up voltage due to inductance from primary to secondary coils with varying the number of turns of the wires, but stars are merely spatial density transformers in a sense of stepping up transverse wave frequency to the conditions whereby the balance of wave pressure is tipped outward to inward which makes fusion possible.

This is all just my interpretation, and I could be using an inferior model to base such conclusions. Just figured I'd throw it out here.

later,

Tim

[AntonioLao]

I could be using an inferior model

More precise model would be any of the quantum field theories of the Standard Model of elementary particles: QED and QCD. On the other hand, if yours describes a model of quantum gravity then you have the advantage over the others. As for me, I'm hoping that very soon I can give a mathematical model of the minimum mass configuration of the spacetime continuum which I desperately needed to create cold fusion.