New Studies and Research

[Mikal]

Are we all keeping pace with new studies and research revealing the fragility of our human biology?


Vaccines amd Immune System Damage
By Randall Neustaedter OMD, LAc, CCH | Published 07/18/2004 | Vaccines |

Randall Neustaedter OMD, LAc, CCH
Dr. Neustaedter has practiced homeopathy and oriental medicine for over 25 years, specializing in child health care. An accomplished and well-recognized author, he has written The Vaccine Guide: Risks and Benefits for Children and Adults (North Atlantic Books, 2002), a book that helps consumers make informed choices about vaccination. His new book, Child Health Guide: Holistic Pediatrics for Parents (North Atlantic Books, 2005), represents a state of the art guide to raising children with natural medical care. He can be reached through his extensive website at www.cure-guide.com.

View all articles by Randall Neustaedter OMD, LAc, CCH Do Vaccines Disable the Immune System?
Parents watch with proud satisfaction as their infant, just a few months old, begins to reach out into the world—tiny hands grasping at toys and gently twirling locks of their mother's hair. Just when they have begun to take a lively interest in the world, rolling-over, cooing, and smiling, the first illnesses strike.
The baby's runny nose develops into a fever, fussiness, and night-waking. Her previously placid demeanor suddenly changes to obvious discomfort—crying, clinging, refusing to leave her mother's arms. The pediatrician sees red eardrums and prescribes antibiotics. That first infection starts a seemingly endless battle against viral and bacterial illnesses that persists despite repeated treatment with a barrage of different antibiotics. Something is dreadfully wrong. Frequent visits to the pediatrician do nothing to prevent the continuous pattern of illness—antibiotic—illness.

Why do these illnesses begin when babies are three or four months old? What event triggers this frustrating scenario? What happens to babies at two to four months that could initiate this relentless course of symptoms? Perhaps maternal antibodies are beginning to wear out, making babies susceptible to these environmental microbes. But why don't these babies develop their own antibodies in response to the initial viral or bacterial infections? What prevents the immune system from mounting a vigorous response? And why does this pattern of illness with recurrent ear infections occur now, a pattern that seldom occurred prior to thirty years ago? What is weakening the immune function of today's infants?

The only event that all infants routinely encounter at two months of age is vaccination with at least five different vaccines (Diphtheria-Tetanus-Pertussis-Polio-Hemophilus). They are repeated at four months. Could this simple fact explain the onset of the recurrent illnesses that plague so many infants? If vaccines stimulate antibody production to fight diseases, why would they weaken the immune system? Is there any evidence that vaccines do cause illness and immune system dysfunction?

One answer came in a careful study of illness patterns observed in babies before and after vaccination. If vaccines cause a weakened immune system, then we would expect to see a higher incidence of illness following vaccination. In that study the incidence of acute illnesses in the 30 day period following DTP vaccine was compared to the incidence in the same children for the 30 day period prior to vaccine. The three-day period immediately following vaccine was excluded because children frequently develop fever as a direct response to vaccine toxins. A total of 82 healthy infants received DTP, and their symptoms were reported by parents and observed by a pediatrician at weekly intervals. Those babies experienced a dramatic increase in fever, diarrhea, and cough in the month following DTP vaccine compared to their health before the shot (Jaber et al., 198.

The incidence of asthma has steadily increased in the modern era. During the period 1980 through 1989 the prevalence rate of self-reported asthma in the United States increased 38 percent, and the death rate for asthma increased 46 percent (Centers for Disease Control, 1992). In the five years from 1985 through 1990, projected estimates for asthma's medical costs increased 53 percent. The total estimated cost of asthma rose from $4.5 billion to $6.2 billion, or 1 percent of all US health-care costs (Weiss et al., 1992). This dramatic increase has been attributed to increased exposure to environmental pollutants, and to the toxic effect of asthma medications themselves. Could vaccines be weakening the immune system of our populations and causing asthma and allergies at unprecedented levels? A recent study suggests the answer is yes. A team of New Zealand researchers, found a greater rate of asthma and allergy episodes among immunized children. Of 1,265 children born in 1977, the 23 who did not receive the diphtheria/pertussis/tetanus shot had no recorded asthma or allergy problems before age 10. Of the children who were vaccinated, 23.1 percent had asthma episodes, and 30 percent had consultations for other allergic illnesses (Kemp, et al., 1997).

How do researchers investigate immune system reactions to vaccines? First, they can observe the incidence of serious disease onset soon after vaccination. They can also study immune functions following vaccines given to children and adults. Two research models have been used to discover the possible adverse effect of vaccines on the immune system. Laboratory researchers observe whether vaccines have any negative effect on white blood cells, the body's primary immune defense system. Clinical researchers study illness patterns preceding and following vaccination. All of these investigative channels have reached the same conclusions—vaccines can trigger immune system suppression.

Vaccines are destroying our immune systems. Amazingly, the medical profession ignores the incriminating evidence against vaccines, and continues to inflict more unnecessary and harmful vaccines on our nation's infants. A recent study from the New England Journal of Medicine reported by Time magazine and the Associated Press revealed that tetanus vaccine disables the immune system in HIV patients. Tetanus vaccination produced a drop in T cells in 10 of 13 patients, a classic sign of immune deficiency. HIV viral replication increased dramatically in response to tetanus vaccine. Finally, white blood cells from 7 of 10 uninfected individuals became more susceptible to HIV infection following tetanus vaccination. Despite these findings, the authors made no comment about the immune depleting effect of the vaccine (Stanley et al., 1996).

Why is the public unaware of these findings? Why has the medical profession kept these reports hidden from the public eye? With typical condescension, Dr. Martin Smith, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, explained that the inclusion of this type of information in vaccine brochures "would confuse many parents and could even needlessly alarm them" (AAP News, 1989). An uninformed patient is compliant.

The cover-up of immune system failure following vaccination is reminiscent of the tobacco industry's continuous denial and disinformation campaign about the dangers of cigarettes. In both instances huge profits are at stake in multibillion-dollar industries. Vaccine manufacturers cannot afford to have their product maligned in a public forum.

Doctors have often stated that broadcasting adverse effects of vaccines to the public would hinder the vaccine campaign. This attitude emerged in congressional hearings more than thirty years ago.

It is hard to convince the public that something is good. Consequently, the best way to push forward a new program is to decide on what you think the best decision is and not question it thereafter, and further, not to raise questions before the public or expose the public to open discussion of the issues (Intensive Immunization Programs, Hearings, 1962).

The medical profession has been aware of the damaging effects of vaccines on the immune system since their introduction. For example, the ability of pertussis and DTP vaccines to stimulate the onset of paralytic polio was first noted in 1909. In every polio epidemic since then DTP injections have caused the onset of polio disease.

In 1950, two careful studies were conducted in the state of New York to evaluate the reports of an association between the onset of paralytic polio and recent injections. Investigators contacted the families of all children who contracted polio during that year, a total of 1,300 cases in New York City and 2,137 cases in the remainder of New York State. A history of vaccinations received in the previous two months was obtained on each child and from a group of matched controls in the same population. Those studies discovered that children with polio were twice as likely to have received a DTP vaccination in the two months preceding the onset of polio than were the control children (Korns et al., 1952; Greenberg et al., 1952).

[Mikal]

Continued

The association of vaccines with the onset of polio continues in the modern age. During a recent polio epidemic in Oman, DTP vaccination again caused the onset of paralytic polio In that epidemic, 70 children 5 to 24 months old contracted paralytic polio during the period 1988-1989. When compared to a control group of children without polio, it was found that a significantly higher percentage of these children had received a DTP shot within 30 days of the onset of polio, 43 percent of polio victims compared to 28 percent of controls (Sutter et al., 1992). The DTP vaccine suppresses the body's ability to fight off the polio virus.

The destructive effect of vaccines on the immune system can persist over an extended period of time. One study documented a long-term depressive effect on interferon production. Interferon is a chemical produced by lymphocytes (a type of white blood cell) that renders the host resistant to infection. Interferon production is stimulated by infection with a virus to protect the body from superinfection by some other organism. In this study, vaccination of one-year-old infants with measles vaccine caused a precipitous drop in the level of alpha-interferon produced by lymphocytes. This decline persisted for one year following vaccination, at which time the experiment was terminated. Thus, this study showed that measles vaccine produced a significant long-term immune suppression (Nakayama et al., 198

Autoimmune Reactions to Vaccines
An 11 year old girl received a routine tetanus booster dose and three days later developed blindness in the right eye and light perception only in the left eye. Her optic discs were swollen on exam. Two days later she had partial paralysis of her legs and loss of bladder control, then more widespread sensory loss including a lack of vibrational and positional senses. Seven weeks later she still had some vision loss and decreased muscle power. Within one year she recovered (Topaloglu et al., 1992).
A 20 year old woman experienced pain and swelling of her right wrist and fingers 4 days after a hepatitis vaccination. The pain and swelling resolved, but returned again 6 months later with more severe swelling and pain, following a second hepatitis vaccination. Nine years later, X-ray of the hands showed destruction of the bones throughout her wrist joints (Gross et al., 1995).
A 4 year old girl developed progressive weakness of the legs, pain in the legs and feet, and gradual inability to walk 10 days after Hib vaccination. On the fifth day she had swallowing difficulties, facial weakness, and a monotonous voice. Her symptoms gradually improved, and within 3 weeks she could walk with help (Gervaix et al., 1993).
A 42 year old man received tetanus toxoid on three separate occasions over a period of 13 years. Following each vaccination he developed acute nerve symptoms diagnosed as Guillain-Barré syndrome, a disease of the nervous system characterized by rapid onset of motor weakness and loss of sensation. (Pollard & Selby, 197. A nerve biopsy revealed destruction of the myelin nerve sheath. Following his last injection he continued to experience multiple recurrences, and continued to show abnormal findings on examination 15 years later (Pollard, 1993).
What is the effect of long-term immune suppression? Some investigators are concerned that vaccines could be disabling our body's ability to react normally to disease, and creating the climate for autoimmune self-destruction. The many reports of autoimmune phenomena that occur as reactions to vaccination provide incontrovertible proof that tampering with the immune system causes devastating disease.

Federal legislation of 1986 commissioned the Institute of Medicine to establish a Vaccine Safety Committee. The purpose of that committee was to search the medical literature for reports of adverse events associated with the vaccines routinely administered to children, and report their findings. Computer searches revealed 1,800 relevant articles. However, the committee's rigid criteria for establishing a causal relationship between vaccine and adverse event made it nearly impossible for a disease condition to make their short list. Without a case-controlled study proving a relationship, the hundreds of case reports of immune system destruction following vaccines were relegated to coincidence. Case-controlled studies are expensive. They must include tens or hundreds of thousands of children.

Even the Vaccine Safety Committee acknowledged the onset of several autoimmune diseases as a result of vaccination (Guillain-Barré syndrome following tetanus and polio vaccines, that causes muscle weakness and paralysis; thrombocytopenia, destruction of blood platelets responsible for blood clotting, following MMR; and chronic arthritis following rubella). These types of symptoms have occurred following every vaccine routinely given to children—the suppressed immune system begins to attack the body's own cells, usually the nerves and joints. Thousands of autoimmune incidents following vaccines have been reported in the medical literature and adverse event reporting systems (Neustaedter, 1996). These autoimmune responses to vaccines have resulted in permanent, chronic disease conditions—deforming arthritis and muscle wasting and paralysis.

In their attempt to explain the repeated occurrence of autoimmune diseases that attack and destroy the myelin sheaths of nerves as a direct result of vaccines, the committee members explain:

It is biologically plausible that injection of an inactivated virus, bacterium, or live attenuated virus might induce in the susceptible host an autoimmune response by deregulation of the immune response, by nonspecific activation of the T cells directed against myelin proteins, or by autoimmuniity triggered by sequence similarities of proteins in the vaccine to host proteins such as those of myelin (Institute of Medicine, 1994).

Since the committee's report, a large ecological study in New Zealand revealed that an epidemic of diabetes followed a massive campaign to vaccinate children against hepatitis B. This report, published in the New Zealand Medical Journal in 1996 revealed that a 60 percent increase in childhood diabetes occurred in the years following the 1989-1991vaccination program of chidren aged 6 to 16. The widespread use of the new Haemophilus meningitis vaccine has similarly resulted in diabetes epidemics. Diabetes is an autoimmune disease that has been frequently observed to occur as a consequence of mumps vaccine (Fescharek et al., 1990; Helmke et al., 1986). The dramatic rise in vaccine-induced diabetes has led researchers to raise a warning flag. "We believe the effects of vaccines on diabetes are of tremendous clinical importance and that trials need to be started immediately to address the effect of vaccines on diabetes and other autoimmune diseases (Classen & Classen, 1996).

Vaccines have become a sacred cow of our culture, unassailable to criticism. Now that we know their devastating effects on the immune system, perhaps we need to take a more cautious approach to the vaccine campaigns. The zealous rush to bring new vaccines to market may be setting the stage for the unwitting destruction of our population's immune system integrity.


All comments and thoughts sought on this serious issue....


Mikal

[dolly]

Hi Mikal, good/interesting topic.

A good friend of mine has two children, a girl (now an adult) and a boy (late teens). I have no knowledge of their immunization history. The daughter was bottle fed and susceptive to ear infections. Her son was breast fed and experienced none.

To my knowledge humans are the only species that consume milk after weening. Personally I dislike milk and never drink it, that's not to imply I never eat ice cream, cheese or butter. I've always found it curious that humans drink milk while other species do not.

Look forward to reading more of your posts.

PEACE dolly

[Mikal]

Hi Dolly...thanks for your thoughts here. I guess I am like you, do not drink milk but take it in through foods like cheese...etc...

Its interesting that breastfed babies seem to be healthier than bottle fed babies..less infections and less illness. I guess thats probably the real reason why we have breasts as they are a natural milk production system..lol Also mom through her breast milk gives her baby more immunity..so better health. Also the fact that Bisphemol which is a highly dangerous chemical and is in the plastic of baby bottles is now a big scandal and at least Canada did go forward and ban this...
Also an interesting situation is the rapid rise in children who are now lactose intolerant....lots of studies been done to understand that allergy...


Mikal

[labelwench]

Hello all,

Based on a great deal of reading I have done over the last 10 years, far more poeple are lactose intolerant than you know, estimated 85% of persons. There is a wide range of symptoms from the mild to the dramatic that just cease to be when you quit ingesting milk.

All of the information that I have reviewed is available on-line. Additionally, there is an equal amount of reading that contradicts these findings.

For myself, I am convinced. When I use dairy products, there is a price to pay, won't bore you with the details. Suffice it to say, that I can duplicate my discomfort each and every time I do dairy by means of a food diary and a control diet. There are a few dairy products that I enjoy and that afford only moderate discomfort, hence I yield to temptation occasionally.

Dairy and vaccines are but two of a number of highly contentious issues on the health agenda.

Regards,

Labelwench

[Mikal]

Hi LW...thanks for your thoughts and contributions to this new thread.

I discovered in my studies that there is a difference between lactose intolerance and milk and dairy allergy. LI is the situation of too small a quantity of the digestive enzyme lactase and is connected to disease, drugs or surgery. Milk or dairy allergy is a reaction to protein so is an immune system reaction.

I think the dilemma is connected to big industrial farming versus smaller communal family farming. I read a report by 2 investigative reporters who lost their job through pressure by the Farming Industrial Complex and they said that happened because they released their investigative report about the milk supply being adulturated with the effects of injected synthetic hormone or Bovine Growth Hormone...

I think their job loss connected with their journalistic investigative report speaks to us strongly about a lot of insidious interference into our food supply which is most definitely not about our health or wellbeing but very much about money, profit and greed....


Mikal

[melanie]

http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Future+of+Food#


http://video.google.com/videosearch?q=Fast+Food+Nation#


http://video.google.com/videosearch?...Modified+Food#


_________________________________


http://video.google.com/videosearch?...accine+Agenda#


http://www.google.com/search?q=population+reduction

[Mikal]

Hi Mel...thanks so much for dropping some important links...especially your first link on the vaccine issue. I have been studying the reports of neurologists, immunologists, toxicologists and physicians waking up to this horrible issue but that is the first radiologist I have listened to...as you can see the battle is widening and more than likely will continue to do so for very valid reasons.

I don't think we should fall into the rut of just removing mercury and thermosol from vaccines...the additional additives like aluminum and even animal tissues holds immense danger to the integrity of our immune system. You take the new Gardisil vaccine for only females...one additive in it is of a chemical compound in the nature of birth control, so what does this mean for a generation of young girls?? Are they going to be struggling later with serious infertility problems....

We have been asleep for too long and need to wake up...this is about the serious rate of drastic increase over 30 years of massive developmental problems in a whole generation of our children...this is about the violation of the integrity of our immune system...

This is a very serious issue we should all take seriously....

Mikal

[Mikal]

ET Sting Operation Exposes Gaps in Oversight of Human Experiments Article

Comments
more in Health »By ALICIA MUNDY
WASHINGTON -- Thousands of medical research groups that monitor clinical trials on behalf of the drug industry may face tougher regulations in the wake of a congressional sting operation that found gaps in the nation's oversight of experiments on humans.

The sting, detailed at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing Thursday, involved the creation of a fictitious company and a fake medical device, a surgical adhesive gel. The sham firm then applied to three for-profit oversight groups -- called institutional review boards, or IRBs -- for approval to begin a clinical trial using their adhesive on human subjects.

Drug and device makers along with hospitals and university research facilities must retain an independent IRB to oversee the methodology and safety issues for human studies. Corporations cannot get Food and Drug Administration approval for their products without an IRB certifying their clinical trials. About 6,350 IRBs are registered with the Department of Health and Human Services.

Lawmakers have raised concerns over whether IRBs routinely approve medical studies for paying clients. The committee leaders are considering whether to introduce a bill to strengthen IRB regulations.

Two IRBs contacted by the GAO's sting operators -- Argus IRB of Arizona and Fox IRB of Illinois -- rejected the Adhesiabloc proposal because of unanswered safety questions.

"We realized it was a terrible risk for the patient … It is the worst thing I have ever seen," an Argus IRB reviewer said, according to a slide shown at the hearing.

Coast IRB LLC of Colorado Springs, Colo., did approve a study for the fictitious adhesive gel, "Adhesiabloc." Five months after approving the study for abdominal surgery patients, Coast learned that neither Adhesiabloc nor its maker, Device Med-Systems of Virginia, existed.

Coast CEO Dan Dueber said in an interview that the congressional case was illegal entrapment. At the hearing, Mr. Dueber testified, "The GAO perpetrated an extensive fraud against my company. You pulled the wool over our eyes -- congratulations." Because the product was fake, it was never used.

As part of the sting, the committee also created a sham IRB to see whether the Department of Health and Human Services, which registers IRBs, would certify their fictitious group.

The committee, working with the Government Accountability Office, Congress's investigatory arm, named the CEO of the fake IRB Truper Dawg, after a staffer's three-legged dog, now deceased. Other fake names included "April Phuls" and "Timothy Wittless," which lawmakers said should have signaled irregularities to HHS. The department registered the IRB.

At Thursday's hearing, the toughest complaints were reserved for HHS. Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, the committee's ranking Republican, asked one HHS official: "Do you have any sense of outrage?" Referring to Coast, he continued, "What steps are being taken right now to decertify these charlatans?"

The director of HHS's office that registers review boards, Jerry Menikoff, said at the hearing that his bureau had only recently received the committee information about Coast, and would look into the matter.

THE WALL STREET JOURNAL. MARCH 26, 2009


Living with blind faith seems to be a foolish way to live in this world....

Mikal

[nameless]

Randall Neustaedter OMD, LAc, CCH
Dr. Neustaedter has practiced homeopathy... for over 25 years...

This, in itself, reduces his credibility to practically zero, which, beyond 'placebo effect' is the actual effectiveness (zero) of 'homeopathy' (besides making money on folk's naivette' and gullibility).
That he has perpetrated that fraud for so long is inexcusable!

This also reduces the credibility of anything else that he might offer. Whatever he offers subsequently, though not necessarily false or incorrect, needs to be very carefully examined in that 'light'.