View RSS Feed

TORONICS by D.Levi Wing

TORONICS by D.Levi Wing

Rate this Entry
by , 11-16-2006 at 04:09 PM (8512 Views)
Interpretations of Physics:
We have come a long way from the Galilean methodology of physics and even further from Newtonian classical concepts of physics. We have advanced our science discipline to delve deep within the hart of physical matter and structure. Our science has evolved to such an advanced level of physics it requires a lifetime of dedication to become proficient in its application and understanding. How could we possibly hope to comprehend the magic and mystery of our universe without the intense years of academic study. Is there any way to interpret the numbers into a simplified examination that can be understood by the masses. I believe it can be done.

Many authors of science texts that cover Relativity and Quantum theory, tend to dedicate significant amounts of their books to the history of physics and not enough to the actual meaning of the terminology used by theoretical physics. What is meant when we say force, charge, energy, dimensions, gravity, and so on? What is the physical mechanism that accounts for the cause of the observed effects or phenomena?

Often we hear the phrase that "it is just common sense". Common sense would infer that there is something called "common knowledge"; This surely does not apply when discussing theoretical physics. So were do we define the demarcation line between common sense and advanced comprehension skills? – is it a seventh grade level, a high school level, or some level of college? Should we expect someone with a high school level of physics to be able to comprehend the interpretations of Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, or even M-theory?

Before we entered high school physics, we understood that if something was dropped from a height above the Earth, it would fall faster and faster before hitting the ground. We may not have understood the precision of the rate of acceleration but we had the common sense to know not to jump from tall buildings by understanding the paradigm of this principle of acceleration. With a little more understanding of fundamental terminology of physics, we can achieve a fundamental understanding of the more advanced theories even though we may never achieve the mathematical skills to present them formally. This is the paradigm of interpretation needed to understand what the numbers are telling us. Unfortunately this paradigm is not even known to physicist attempting to translate the mathematical language to the spoken language used by the rest of us. Toronics is an attempt to bridge this gap between common language and the mathematical numbers.

The most significant realization within the Toronic paradigm was the nature and meaning of the physics term "mass". This alone answers many of the nagging questions of science today. The missing mass of the universe; The increased acceleration of the universe; Black holes; and many others. Just as Einstein's energy equation brought forth a more comprehensive understanding of radiation, the one new concept of Toronics links the forces of nature to one fundamental cause-and-effect interaction of the stuff that the universe is made of.

The Terms of Measure:
Throughout the history of science we have created terminology to define various phenomena we measure. The most commonly known terms in theoretical physics are mass ,energy, gravity, force, motion, space, and time. There are however, several thousand more distributed throughout the many branches of science. These terminologies are the measured or defined phenomena that we observe. Our world of scientific terminology is enormous and complex beyond the full comprehension of any single individual and yet we seek a link of simplicity that will place them into a universal mathematical concept.
Though many science writers and scientist themselves are attempting to inject a level of subjective truth to the philosophy of physics and science, it would be wise to disregard these views as attempt to convert science into a religion. Science is based solely on our ability to perform measurements and obtain empirical data to support a belief called a hypotheses or theory. Once we inject a subjective interpretation into our discipline, the nature of science changes to one of faith and belief dictated by the temples of wisdom and knowledge. Even though we may reach a level that is beyond our ability to test and measure, it is far better to say we "don't know" than to inject superstition or supernatural subjective views into our science. We are now in a phase of science that is attempting to proclaim prominent theories as proven facts when they are far from any level of acceptable scientific proof. Though much of the mathematics function, the interpretive paradigm is too bizarre to warrant acceptance. We may continue to use the math but we must not proclaim knowing the meaning of the numbers until we have a physical paradigm that is rational and simplistic; One that smoothly combines Relativity and Quantum physics to explain why the mathematics work. This is the goal of " The Toronic Concept of Our Physical Universe".

The process of using a myriad of terms to describe our universe has lead to the development of mathematical models of our universe called gauge theories. Relativity, Quantum Physics, and String theory are the current models vying for top billing. These theories are not defining reality, they are defining quantities of various mathematical values and terms used in the process of experimental measurements. Only when we are able to trace these terms to fundamental absolutes, will we truly understand reality. Once we reach the understanding of absolutes, we will have the fundamental causality of the universe. At this point we will have only one questions unanswered; “Did existence come into being or has it always been?”

The ideal scientific goal is to find a fundamental common concept that will reduce all our measurements and mathematical equations to a simple an unique paradigm of physical philosophy. This philosophy will provide the logical path from the start of our universe and hold true through any and all phenomena to the present state of the cosmos. We understand the philosophy behind the workings of a computer by reducing it to the fundamental idea of a switch position of "ON" or "OFF". Regardless of how complex a computer seems to be, the root philosophy remains simple and can be followed into all aspects of the computer and its programming. The ideal concept behind the workings of the universe must also have a similar simplicity at its fundamental root.

Most of our knowledge of the universe and how it functions is based on the state of the material substance of the universe, its structure, and its interactions. We have often heard mentioned by scientist that the laws of physics, as we know them, may not apply to the substance of the Big Bang or to the matter within the depths of a black hole. It may be that the laws of physics as we know them, only apply to the fundamental substance of the universe when it has achieved structure as atomic and subatomic particles. It would appear that we really do not know the fundamental laws that govern the behavior of a singularity, or the fundamental stuff of the universe and its functions. What are the basic tools of nature needed to create such remarkable vistas? We may find that the answer is not any more complex than that of an ON/OFF state of a switch when understanding the behavior and properties of a computer. The laws of physics and nature must be true for all levels and states of the universe without exception. What defines the actions of the atomic structure must also apply to black holes, stars, particles, and to the event that created this universe. Any exceptions to the a law makes that law invalid. Expansion cannot be an exception to the speed of light in a vacuum as being the ultimate velocity. The velocity attributed to expansion is the ultimate velocity and must apply to all states of matter in the universe. This is "Absolute Motion" and is the motion quantity of all physical systems in the universe.

Dimensions and Entities:
Dimensions are parameters and terms that are derived from quantitative measurements.
Why do so many SiFi movies embrace the idea of dimensions as a way to add mystery and awe to their scripts and create suspenseful plots? Could it be the fact that the general public have been lead to believe existence is entwined with other dimensional realms of reality that coexist with the one we call our own universe? Our scientific notions for some, seem to be wandering into the stomping grounds reserved for our religious faiths.
The true concept and meaning of dimensions infers a parameter or term that is the result of a quantitative measurement. Length, width, and depth are dimensions that allow us to depict distances; together they depict volume. Time is a measured quantity and thus is a dimension. Mass is a measured quantity and thus is a dimension. Energy is a measured quantity and thus it too is a dimension. Of course many dimensions are determined indirectly by knowing the values of other dimensions. Knowing a quantity of energy allows us to determine a quantity of mass and visa versa.

There are only two types of entities of existence; physical entities and nonphysical entities.
Unfortunately we often view our mathematics as if the term on the left side of the equation is representing an entity or fundamental of the universe. This often leads to an abstract concept such that energy, force, time and so on, are independent and autonomous entities of the universe. There are only two types of entities; physical entities that are objects of a fundamental physical substance, and nonphysical entities that are attributes of the fundamental physical substance or the void partially occupied by our universe.
When interpreting the meaning of our abstract mathematical theories an their terms, it is extremely important to question: "Are we interpreting an entity or a dimension?" If we apply this philosophy to all our science terminology, we find that our science is virtually and exclusively comprised of terms that depict only dimensions and seldom any real entities. This makes perfect sense since our science is based on the process of measurement. Thus the interpretations of these measurements should have a paradigm that describes the entities of substance and their attributes rather than proclaiming dimensions as entities. This is what leads to the fundamental absolutes of Toronics.

Energy and mass are dimensions of matter; what do the numbers really mean? Why does energy convert to mass and mass to energy? These may seem to be simple questions and maybe you may think they have already been answered. The truth is, they have not been satisfactorily answered and they are quite profound concepts. These are the cornerstones of our Standard Model of modern theoretical physics. The concepts presented by the Toronic Hypotheses is intended to provide a fundamental understanding of these terms that will remove the mystery and allow science to move into the next realm of a paradigm shift of interpretation.


  1. 's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    Quote Originally Posted by David
    There are only two types of entities; physical entities that are objects of a fundamental physical substance, and nonphysical entities that are attributes of the fundamental physical substance or the void partially occupied by our universe.
    David, this quote of yours sums it all up. Its the first time I have heard the term "void partially", could you express this term to me in a more detailed expression?
  2. dr9090's Avatar
    • |
    • permalink
    I suggest that not all "physical entities" qualify as "matter"...

    and that the "non-physical entities" of the universe suggested are either "relationships" (especially, changing relationships = "motion") or "void" = space not occupied by physical entities. Neither are physical, but keep in mind that "relationships" and "void" are not equivalent. "Relationships" are dependent upon an intelligent observer making measurements.