http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/ en Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:15:37 GMT vBulletin 60 http://www.toequest.com/forum/images/styles/TotallyPro/misc/rss.jpg http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/ http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/58-toronics-d-levi-wing.html Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:13:16 GMT Before we can enter into the concepts of physical characteristics of Torons and the more advanced structures, we need to acquire an understanding of waves and their properties and interactions. *_Wave Characteristics:_* What are electromagnetic waves? Waves have common behavior... Before we can enter into the concepts of physical characteristics of Torons and the more advanced structures, we need to acquire an understanding of waves and their properties and interactions.

Wave Characteristics:
What are electromagnetic waves? Waves have common behavior characteristics that experience reflection, refraction, diffraction, interference, dispersion, and linear propagation.
Reflection is a change in the direction of a wave after striking a surface.
Refraction is the change of direction of a wave as it passes from one medium into another.
Diffraction is the spreading out of waves in a conical or spherical pattern.
Interference is the differential phenomena of summation of in phase and difference when out of phase of waves at the interface of contact.
Dispersion is the separation of waves according to their frequency.
Linear propagation is the movement of waves in straight lines.
We also have two types of waves called transverse waves and longitudinal waves.
Transverse waves produce vibrations perpendicular to the direction of the wave's travel; examples are the waves produced by shaking a rope up and down with a small forward an back motion. The loop of the rope appears to travel from you to the other end of the rope with the loop perpendicular to the ground.
Longitudinal waves produce vibrations along the direction of the wave's travel; examples are sound waves in the air that compress molecules of air momentarily as the wave travels.

Electromagnetic Waves:
When we look into the night sky, we have been lead to believe that what we are seeing or what is entering our eyes, is something that left that star many years earlier. This would mean that light would have to be an object propagated from these stars and traveling through space until it enters our visual senses or one of many scientific instruments. This may indeed be a plausible concept if it were not for Relativity indicating that space itself has physical properties. If space has physical properties, then space is a physical entity or medium; Light, therefore are the vibrations of this substance and not a particle of light or photon moving from place to place. For some unknown reason, scientist of the early twentieth century who proposed this concept, were ignored or unable to provide a functional concept for the medium; thus, complexity, confusion, and chaos has plagued science for over a century.

All waves require a medium:
Albert Einstein deemed it unnecessary and others claim it does not exist. Possibly without knowing it, Einstein developed a mathematical theory that defined the behavior of the fundamental substance of matter in such a chaotic state of vibrating motion that it has defied the scientific methodology for over a century. This state of matter is what's known as "spacetime" by the Relativists and as "Aether" prior to Albert's solution.

Electromagnetic radiation is considered to be transverse type waves that travel without the need of a medium. In reality there is a medium of pseudo unstructured matter that varies its spatial density and promotes waves much like the longitudinal compression waves of air molecules that produce sound waves of different air densities. This would mean that the electromagnetic waves are not truly transverse; Only the electrical and magnetic properties produced by the changing spatial densities are transverse in their nature.

Aether and Matter Waves:
The nature of the Aether is such that at any given instance, a spatial location is expanding and condensing in all spatial directions. The chaotic wave and interference randomization of this fundamental matter is what constitutes the Aether and what is commonly known as space or a vacuum. Unfortunately we have assigned terms like charge, gravity, voltage, and so on as properties depicting types of matter or as space itself. Thus the nature of the Aether has been hidden as a result of it being scaled and accounted for in the mathematical terms of our equations. If we adopt a paradigm of physical interactions between structured matter and Aethereal unstructured matter, it becomes vividly apparent as to the cause-and-effect processes taking place.

Many who have only considered the randomized wave function of matter tend to define all phenomena as only waves. This is predominant in Quantum Theory and M-theory. Though the wave nature of matter follows a proportional relationship to the behavior characteristics of matter, it is only part of the total motion component of any physical system. This has also lead to the many concepts that separate matter and energy as distinct entities. Energy viewed as anything other than the motion state of matter, becomes an obscure and abstract notion that requires complex interpretations.

If we view the universe as a sphere with ultimate boundaries, we can say that the Aether is confined to the boundary limits of this sphere. Since waves have a finite velocity, it requires time to propagate a change over long distances. This results in the Aether lacking what we can call "wave symmetry" where the waves of the universe form a coherent interference pattern. Other than the physical size of the universe, the other disruption to symmetry is the fact that there are other objects in the universe that introduce vibrations of the Aether at all different wavelengths; thus the Aether is chaotic with wave motions and interference patterns.

Wave Symmetry:
What would happen if we could confine electromagnetic waves within a perfect sphere the size of a marble with perfect reflecting internal surface? The wavelengths would be limited to the physical dimensions of the marble's diameter and thus only wavelengths smaller than this diameter would exist in the sphere. Due to the physical size of this sphere, waves would be able to interact in almost instantaneous time. This would setup differential interference that would produce a symmetrical pattern within the sphere. This in affect is wave symmetry and the concept of a fundamental unit of structure. The question arises as to what causes waves to be confined within finite volumes?

Angular uniform motion:
We have stated that the bonding property of matter increases as motion becomes uniform. When a quantity of matter acquires spin (uniform angular motion), the volume of matter associated with this spin condenses forming an interface boundary with the surrounding Aethereal matter. This volume of matter now confines the vibrating wavelengths within these boundaries. This boundary forms a surface characteristic that promotes standing waves about and through the object or field.

The Photon:
The photon is one of the most misunderstood concepts in scientific literature. We are often lead to believe this is a particle of radiant energy and given the illusion of it traveling through space. Though this visualization is convenient when explaining various phenomena involving light, it leads to unnecessary confusion. What we refer to as a photon, is the observed measured quantity of energy that is emitted or absorbed by structured matter. Planck showed that this quantity occurs in discrete increments relative to the frequency of the radiation; Einstein coined this as packets of energy and thus the illusion of light as a particle was born again. In a sense, the photon represent the quantity of matter that defines a Toron but does not acquire the angular momentum needed to become autonomous. The photon is the quantity of an Aethereal transverse matter wave and not the particle of light so often proclaimed.

When it is said that energy is absorbed or emitted, we sometimes view this as an interaction that denotes the exchange of matter or the exchange of an entity of energy. The reality is that there is not an exchange of anything. This concept of exchange comes from the notion that the term "mass" is referring to a quantity of matter and that mass and energy are equivalent. These two terms are equivalent only due to the fact that they are two terms that define the same phenomena - the measure of the motion state of matter (mass) and the measure of the change in the motion state of matter (energy). The interactions we call absorption and emission are changes in the distribution of the absolute motion of the autonomous particle matter. If the motion is randomized the particle will expand (decreased self-affinity) and oscillate its diameter. If the interaction results in converting the randomized motion of the particle to uniform motion, the particle will attempt to collapse its matter (increased self-affinity); again resulting in an oscillation of its diameter. Thus, no exchange of any entity, no matter, and no energy. Energy however, remains a mathematical term needed to define this change in the distribution of absolute motion; however a more vivid understanding of the physical interaction taking place will allow us to comprehend and interpret these mathematical and measured terms.

What was describe in the previous paragraph is the fundamental concept of producing coherent light (Laser light). The oscillations of the physical structures produce a common wavelength of vibrations in the substance's spatial Aether and thus produces the effect of a temporary change of the electron's energy state. This coherent vibration is propagated as a wave into the environmental Aethereal matter producing the observed EM wave. ]]> dleviwing http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/58-toronics-d-levi-wing.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/56-toronics-d-levi-wing.html Sat, 18 Nov 2006 20:32:17 GMT At one time we were able to say that the universe was everything that existed. Now we need to refine this image such to say "the Cosmos represents everything that exists". Our universe is but one of many within the infinity of the Cosmos. Having stated this, let's consider some beginnings of our universe and the Genesis hypotheses.

The Standard Model:
The standard model describes our universe as having expanded from a “singularity”; a point-like region of space (or in space) that was supersaturated with energy that formed an ultra-hot ultra-dense medium in which the gravity was so strong that it curved space back on itself in a distance of about 10^-36 cm. As the universe became larger it cooled from its ultra-dense ultra-hot origins. The fundamental interactions sorted themselves out into the strong, weak, electromagnetic, and gravitational forces. The resulting mixed soup of matter, neutrinos, and radiation, cooled and separated, and the components went their separate ways. The radiation component, we still see today as the cosmic microwave background. The matter congealed into dust clumps that became galaxies. Stars formed, exploded in supernova violence, and formed again, repeatedly recycling matter into heavier elements. The result is what we call the Big Bang even though it is really a Big Swelling.

To clarify this inflation model further, we must also accept the notion that nothing existed prior to this event. By nothing, science means that there was not a place for the universe to expand into. No empty void and no existence of any kind. As a realist, I have a problem with this something from absolute nothing scenario. The Standard Model as it stands may just as well start with the words "Let there be light". This model is another form of the Genesis philosophy.

There are other aspects of this scenario that tend to irritate the right side of our brain. Those who have been through the rigors of Thermodynamics tend to have objections as to the use of the term "ultra-hot". Temperature is often related to "degree of freedom" of an object. The universe object could not have had any significant degree of freedom to warrant such an extreme temperature; so what invoked the rapid rise in temperature? Where is the real physical machinery of cause-and-effect?

One should note however, that the expansion picture is exceptionally accurate for explaining astrological observations. Rather than view the Big Bang as an explosion, expanse describes it as something like raisin bread dough (space) as it rises and carries the raisins (galaxies) along as the dough swells up. If we think of the dough as being the density of space, then we can say that as the universe cools, the spatial density between the galaxies decreases as they continue to move away from each other. An article in the March 2005 issue of Scientific American provides an excellent description of the Big Bang expansion.

Another anomaly of the expansion concept is that scientist tend to say that there is no center of expansion and that every location in the universe can be viewed as the center. This view is valid only in terms of Relativity in stating that motion is relative. In reality we could view the universe as having a center location but it would be of little significance.

Proclaiming the universe as an expanse rather than an explosion, may be premature on our part. An explosion of a substance goes through a type of expanse for a brief interval just prior to becoming a shower of particulate fragmented objects. Our universe may actually be in this pre-fragmentation phase and thus only appear to be expanding. Over the course of time, the universe may simply become a shower of fragmented fundamental matter in the form of galaxies streaming into the outer reaches of a cosmological void. The only difference being that the universe is creating the fragments during its expanse phase, whereas the explosions we are commonly familiar with are of objects already having fragmented structure (atoms).

The "Big Bang" scenario, defined by the quantum theory, provides an interesting feature. If inflation occurred at the rate suggested by quantum theory, then "Absolute motion" would need to be 2x1020 meters per second. This is about 6.5x1011 times faster than our measured velocity of light in a vacuum. Since the expansion rate seems to exceed Einstein's edict that nothing can travel faster than light, we often hear that expansion is an exception to that rule. "The laws of physics must not have exceptions!" Thus the speed of light is not an ultimate speed limit.

The Toronic Collision Model:
Any scenario of a beginning of the universe is purely speculative and quite likely not provable. The Toronic view of existence is all inclusive of everything that exists whether it is within our known universe, observed universe, the unobserved universe or the cosmos beyond our universe. The fundamental laws of physics and the interpretive paradigm explaining them, must hold true in all cases and levels of reality. The fundamental nature and function of the physical substance of the universe does not change.

What was before genesis of our universe? Did other universes attempted to form from such enormous quantities of matter that they produced gravitational phenomena so strong that they collapsed and expanded over and over? Did this closed cycle cause this supper-universe to lose quantities of matter into the cosmos with each cycle until it reached just the right proportions to continue the expanse as an open universe destined unto itself to eventually disperse into the cosmos and evaporate forever?

One scenario is that matter was concentrated in units of enormous quantities. These units may have been whizzing through the cosmos with absolute linear motion (2x10^20 m/s) in all different directions. By some remote chance, two of these units where on a collision course ordained to create a remarkable existence from this single substance. In this scenario there is no need to comprehend entities of energy, forces, antimatter, or gravity, to explain the existence of stars, planets, and galaxies, only an understanding of the basic properties of the fundamental substance that is about to collide. These properties are primarily, “Self-affinity” (bonding) and “Absolute Motion”. These units of matter had these properties before this event and all the material systems formed from these units will have these properties after the event.

It will not be of any significance what the human mind creates for properties to produce mathematical equations; the reality is that if it exists, it is matter or interactions of matter. Energy and Mass are mathematical terms, not terms of real physical existence – they are however; useful abstracts when we need to determine the results of specific experimental events.
If we refer to the fundamentals, we see that these units of matter are at one of their extreme states of motion; that of an absolute solid object. The Self-affinity bonding property is at its maximum so there is no randomized motion to produce a wave function of symmetry nor chaos. One may think that a collision of objects in this state would either bounce off each other or explode into fragments of fundamental matter going in all directions. We know from astrological data that this is not the case; So what does happen?

The illustration (Fig 3.0) shows that prior to the collision, matter with total uniform motion has the effective temperature of a pure absolute zero. We can also view this in the sense that temperature has no meaning prior to the start of the universe just as we view now that time has no meaning prior to this event. The degree of freedom for matter with total linear uniform motion is zero. The collision resulted in an initial conversion of linear uniform motion to randomized motion that created the flurry of wave vibrations that drove the matter of the universe into an ultra-hot state of rapid expansion. A type of Aether formed called quantum foam which was nothing more than the chaotic interference of waves throughout the object. During this phase angular motion was acquire by matter in localized interference domains to confine wave interference to smaller volumes to form the first particulate appearance of matter; these may be what we call black holes today. These particles began to react to the expansion by evaporating more fundamental units of matter into the universe and thus started the process to the evolution of matter into the state we know it to be today. From this point, the scenario is similar to the current standard model as long as we maintain the integrity of the concepts of fundamental absolutes.


Fig 3.00 Temperature through the evolution of the universe.

No natural event can result in matter in the solid state form to break up into smaller units. A collision between objects of matter in this state will result in causing the original uniform linear velocity to redistribute as randomized motion of vibrations (Vr Wave function) and combinations of linear and angular uniform motions (Vu) throughout the substance. The Vr motion is the important quantity that determines the expansion. The surface of this universe particle has now developed a chaotic standing wave function on its surface and a flurry of interference wave actions throughout its interior. We mite say that the universe is in a phase of "Good Vibrations".

At about 10^-32 seconds into the expansion event, the universe achieved minimum entropy in the form of chaotic wave functions. This fundamental substance began to form pockets of matter with similar uniform motion and thus started the process of reducing the disorder of entropy to form the physical structures of matter as we observe them today. This process seems to be continuing as if all the random motion is being converted to bring matter back to a condensed state.

Though the singularity idea is ingenious, I'm afraid it is really not a practical concept for an interpretation for the beginning of a universe. It may be interesting to note that if a collision was the cause of our universe, we may have a sister universe out there in the cosmos or maybe they have merged to form a single universe similar to the next scenario.

The question now becomes, not is there enough gravity, but is there enough uniform angular motion of the universe itself to create a boundary interface with the cosmos. Is the universe spinning such to limit the expansion wave function and thus either stopping the expanse or reversing it. Will the cosmic background radiation become so long of a wavelength that the matter of our galaxy is free to wander into the outer limits of the cosmos. Maybe some day only the stars of the Milky Way Galaxy will illuminate the night sky of the planets we colonize.

The Toronic Particle Universe Model:
Imagine many quantities of fundamental matter equivalent to the matter of our universe and existing in a state of near symmetry. (Vr = Va) Now imagine that these bubbles of gravitational matter have enough spin to create a defined interface with the void of the cosmos. When Vu increases, Vr will decrease by equal amounts. These bubbles are smaller now. Reducing Vr more by giving our universe bubble some linear velocity we again increased Vu and decreased Vr. The wave functions are now shorter and the volume of the universe is smaller. All these universe bubbles do not need their Absolute Motion distributed with the same proportions of Vr and Vu. If we now imagine that two of these bubbles collided with each other; their symmetry would be disrupted and possibly result in the formation of matter systems of galaxies destined to become the universe as we observe it today. This would be similar to the collision model except the two universe structures may merge into one universe or, do as many subatomic particles do and become universe pairs or even clusters.

Maybe nature created the first cosmological particle collider. Though these scenarios may not draw support for a new BB theory, it may be useful for understanding interaction of atomic particles latter on.

Fundamental Substance:
Most of us have perceptions of only atomic matter or the fundamental subatomic particles. We have developed an understanding of the states of atomic matter as being solid, liquid, and gaseous. We could assign these concepts to fundamental matter also; however, the solid state and gaseous state lie at the extremes of uniform and random motion states of Absolute Motion while the liquid state would have to be everything in-between as a scale of how solid to how gaseous the matter. As yet, it is not likely that our science has detected fundamental matter at either extreme. Space and a vacuum are the closest to gaseous fundamental matter observed and possibly a neutrino is the closest to the solid state fundamental matter observed.

Space, The Medium:
When the properties of gasses are discussed, it's usually said that increased temperatures causes molecules or atoms to break their bonds allowing them to freely travel and bounce off each other. When confined to a container, this produces pressure. We cannot use this analogy for the gaseous state of fundamental matter for it is not a collection of particles or quantities of matter traveling through the universe; It is the fundamental substance in a state of randomized vibration and wave interference (Random Motion) that creates variations in spatial density throughout the substance resulting in an expanding universe. No volume of space sustains a constant spatial density long enough to measure anything other than the wave nature through that volume; Even this is difficult when this random motion wave nature is that of the internal spatial density of a subatomic particle!

Many believe electromagnetic waves do not travel in a medium. This is a misconception brought on by the misunderstanding of Relativity and Quantum theories. Our use of mathematics to create these theories simply eliminates the need to account for a medium. The mathematical terms of our equations are already scaled and manipulated to function without defining properties of a medium or developing an Aether Theory. It is this absence of a paradigm to define the properties of a medium and thus the fundamental properties of Matter itself, that has hindered the progress of producing scientific commonsense interpretations of the numbers we obtain from Relativity and Quantum theories since the implementation of these subjective-theory-sciences.

We detect Cosmic Background Radiation in every direction we look into space. This radiation is considered as the remnants of the Big Bang. This would also indicate that our universe is acting as an enclosed system that confines radiation within the boundaries of the system. This simply means that radiation is being reflected back into the universe by some surface barrier at the edge of the universe. Thus the universe can be viewed as an unusually large particle of matter.

An example of this would be to imagine a hollow sphere that's coated on the inside with a perfect mirrored surface. Light propagated inside the sphere would theoretically reflect off the internal surfaces forever inside the sphere. After a time the waves within the sphere will interact until they create interference patterns throughout the interior of the sphere. In the universe this causes the wavelength to lengthen and the universe to expand since there is no ridged structure to limit expansion. Of course it could be viewed that the expansion is causing the wavelengths to lengthen also; however this only applies to radiation propagated after the Big Bang event by luminous bodies or matter interactions.

This is basically the state of our universe today with the exception that our universe sphere is cluttered with objects that are also part of its interior and propagating radiation. If we were to go into the cosmos an view the surface of our universe sphere, we would find that it is not a smooth surface, but a surface textured with chaotic standing waves of unstructured matter like the surface of a pond you have just tossed a hand full of pebbles into. The universe is just one big particle that is continually getting bigger and thus its Absolute Motion is becoming randomized with longer wave functions or cooling, as it is currently explained. At the same time matter in the chaotic randomized state is being converted to uniform motion by subatomic structures an thus space is becoming thinner and thinner until eventually the process will reach a limit and reverse or continue to a total open universe without the physical restrictions of gravitational bonds.

All the wave interference throughout the universe represents the random motion component of the universe's Absolute Motion. Now imagine a group of waves coming from all directions and concentrated to interfere at a location such to bring a quantity of the medium into a high density region of matter with the equivalence of Absolute Motion. If some of this motion is angular in nature, this region of the medium becomes an autonomous domain as if it were a micro universe devoid of structured matter. This domain has surface texture of standing waves, it has an interior of wave interference, and it has a total motion equivalent to Absolute motion. Unlike the universe, this unit of matter has an extremely shorter wavelength function and no interior clutter; at least not yet. The dimensions (radii) of these domains vary only with the conversion of their random motion to uniform motion. Though these domains are autonomous, they are still the same substance as the environmental substance surrounding them and thus, they will interact with the exterior medium and with each other.

The perfect symmetry wave function universe (Figure 3.01 ) is ideal for particles of matter but not for creating a universe teaming with life and diversity of structure. This is really a boring universe with nothing much happening except a lot of vibration and possibly some expansion. This universe quite likely would go static or take billions of our universe life cycles to evolve even the most fundamental units of matter. This may have been the status of our universe just nanoseconds after the event that started us down the path of expansion, but with a little less symmetry.

Fig 3.01
A universe with symmetry wave function.

Fig 3.02
Broken symmetry wave function universe. Image produced by mathematical wave interference distributed randomly.

Fig 3.03
Image from measurements of the variations in cosmic background radiation.

Figure 3.02 shows the most interesting feature of broken wave function symmetry; it looks a lot like the images we obtain from the variations in microwave background radiation temperatures shown in Figure 3.03. Much is happening in this universe! The similarity between the mathematically produced image and the actual image produce by measuring temperature variation of the microwave background appear to be too similar to be ignored. The mathematically constructed image was originally intended to simply show random interference patterns.

We have now defined matter in its unstructured random motion state as being the mysterious undetectable medium of our early twentieth century scientist. Without this concept of a medium, we can only rely on the mathematical modeling process to guide us through bizarre complex dualisms in order to achieve an understanding of radiant energy. However, with this concept we can see why the mathematical models function as they do and why they produce such strange illusions and complexities from their interpretations. ]]> dleviwing http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/56-toronics-d-levi-wing.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/54-toronics-d-levi-wing.html Fri, 17 Nov 2006 20:37:47 GMT The Mystery of Mass:
Mass is a term that all of us believe we have some degree of understanding. The fact is however, we use the numbers and follow the procedures without a true understanding of inertia and the term we've come to know as "Rest Mass". Many have come to visualize mass as a physical quantity of nature and that this quantity can be converted to a non-physical quantity of nature called "Energy". Richard Feynman, though not the first to note this mystery, stated in his book, "QED, The Strange Theory of Light and Matter":

"Throughout this entire story there remains one especially unsatisfactory feature - the observed masses of the particles, "m". There is no theory that adequately explains these numbers. We use the numbers in all our theories, but we don’t understand them – what they are, or where they come from. I believe that from a fundamental point of view, this is a very interesting and serious problem."

One of the surprising and unexpected consequences of the Toronic concept was a solution of the term "m" (mass) in both the general equation for energy of particles (Rest mass) and that of Einstein's equations for radiant energy (Relativistic mass). Though the solution is extremely simple, it reaches into every aspect of Quantum and Relativity theories. It also poses a disturbing consequence; we may be using a term that is not truly representing physical quantities of a physical substance of nature, but only providing a comparison of structured fundamental particle units of matter; though, even this, is without a true reference.

The Toronic approach realized a fundamental redundancy in the mathematics that needed to be addressed.

For the conservation laws of physics to hold true, no isolated physical system may loose any quantity of motion regardless of the interactive events of collision or any other process.

This preordains "energy" and "mass" not only to be interchangeable, but also to be identical in nature. Mass is not a true physical measure of the quantity of a fundamental substance; it is more indicative of a measure of the "Potential Energy" of structured systems of matter; thus both are mathematical terms for energy and thus motion is "ABSOLUTE". Electrons have "Absolute motion"; protons have "Absolute motion"; neutrons have "Absolute motion", and the universe has "Absolute motion". The motion quantity of any system equates to "Absolute motion". For all our conservation laws to work, only motion and the finite quantity of matter needs to be conserved; Energy is a measure of matter in its various states of interactions and its motions; To be more precise, it is the change in, or state of, the distribution of motion of a physical entity. We are able to make an object redistribute its motion within the system, however we are not allowed to cause an object to increase or decrease its quantity of motion - only its quantity of substance can be altered.

Absolute (adj) Perfect in quality or nature; complete.

This is the first definition in The American Heritage Dictionary for the word absolute. In mathematics we reduce equations until no further reduction is possible; we have reached the absolute simplest form of the equation possible. In physics, it is desirable to reduce phenomena to pure cause-and-effect explanations through an understanding of fundamental absolutes.

Many believe that anything that is "absolute" is also axiomatic; if this were so, we would be traveling between the stars and exploring the Milkyway. Unfortunately nature has a magic act of smoke and mirrors that exceeds David Copperfield's best performances. Each time we think we know the trick, it seems the rules of nature change to hide the truth from us. Some believe this is just our inability to observe nature close enough to see her slight-of-hand or hidden mirrors. Others simply believe our brains are incapable of comprehending something as complex as the universe from the macro-world of cosmology to the micro-world of subatomic particles. This latter group may be disappointed!

The Paradigm of Absolutes:
There are objective fundamentals that all mathematical theories should, and most do, reduce their terms. These fundamentals form a paradigm of reality used to form judgments as to the nature of our interpretations of the mathematics. The tendency is to say that the interpretation is logical, makes sense, or is common sense. This is the responsibility of the right side of the brain.

Unfortunately our sense of logic can be influenced and lead astray by false comments when they are made by people we consider being more knowledgeable and experienced than ourselves. Often this comes in the form of a misquoted comment by media people or comments taken out of contexts. This has occurred extensively with publications and visual media involving Relativity and Quantum theories. The most common abuse of this comes in the form of hype promoted by those attempting to attract interest in the subject or a product being sold. This could be anything from the sale of a book, the sale of a college course, or even the sale of one self (a resume).

The paradigms used to form our interpretations of nature and form judgments, must be absolute and axiomatic when ever possible. They must also provide the analogy of cause-and-effect. Any concept or theory that cannot achieve this paradigm is at best incomplete. Unfortunately our standard models fall into this incomplete category even though they are highly accurate theories mathematically. These absolutes do not permit arbitrarily assigning attributes and properties to matter in order to explain observed phenomena or to create an abstract mathematical term. Assigning the term "gravity" to be a function of mass should not be interpreted as "Gravity is a property of matter". The same is true for other mathematically assigned terms like energy, charge, strong force, weak force, and magnetic force; they are not properties of matter. We have made great advances in science and technology even though we have yet to achieve the ideal paradigm.

Mathematical terms are derived from measured phenomena and thus the terms are said to be dimensions. How something goes from being a measured quantity to being interpreted as something beyond or as a coexisting dimension within our universe is quite confusing. This tends to give validity to those who proclaim other plains of existence and converts science into another concept of mysticism. It would appear that some are not pleased with current definitions in dictionaries and text books and tend to add their own meaning to give more mystery to the ordinarily mundane rigors of science.

It has always been the desire of scientist to define nature in pure mechanical cause-and-effect principles. The addition of the concept of "Absolute Motion" may provide the final key to achieving this goal. All the other absolutes are not new ideas; they are only revised or restated old ones.

If our paradigm of science philosophy is in error, then our interpretations of the science of measurement and its data are in error.

Absolute Space:
There was a time in mans ancient history that the vacuum of space provoked the image of some location or volume devoid of all physical entities. Throughout the past century, science has come to recognize the physical nature of this vacuum and evolved it to be denoted as an entity called spacetime by Relativity Theory. The original notion of an absolutely empty and devoid of all physical entities concept is however, still valid and we can call this "Absolute Space". To prevent further confusion however, let's just call it "the Void" or "a Void". Within this universe we do not seem to be able to produce a true void condition.

Void and space are synonymous for vacuum, so we need to revise our vacuum definition to exclude the word void as a synonym. A vacuum, like space, is defined as a mathematical region or volume described by spacetime geometry (4D Special Relativity). Unfortunately this destroys our beautiful concept of nothingness and emptiness due to the phenomena of mass that distorts, warps, and bends space (General Relativity). Maybe if we travel beyond the limits of our universe into the cosmos, we may find the idealized emptiness of a true void. There is however, the possibility that we may be able to create this condition in our labs someday. As it stands, this volume of the void is occupied by our universe so we have limitations placed upon us by nature. What we call space or a vacuum is a physical entity of substance.

This next absolute is included due to the many misinterpretations brought about by attempts to explain its use in Relativity and the oddities inferred by mathematical terms that show it to be an entity of the universe.

Absolute Time:
What time is it? You look at the clock and say, 7:44. Of course we already know if it's AM or PM. We say we know what time is – but do we really? If we go to the dictionary for a definition, we find in order to define time; it requires a great deal of the page and many clarifications. Again the preferred definition is the first one.

Time (n) a nonspatial continuum in which events occur in apparently irreversible succession from the past through the present to the future.

If we remover the word "apparently", this definition is "Absolute Time". It is a definition we use to communicate events and motions during generalized discussions. There is really no beginning or starting point for the "time continuum vector", but we usually consider the Big Bang event as the start of time for our universe.

Now, the problem with time comes not when we communicate motion, but when we try to measure motion. To perform a measurement of the motion of an object, we require a reference; a physical object with cyclic motion events; time does not have substance nor does it have volume. Tic-tock tick-tock; our reference ends up being a physical object with all the anomalies of all physical objects and we call it a "clock". Motion affects the physical character of material objects. Lorentz and others recognized this and created equations to compensate for this phenomenon. Einstein has taken it a step further and created a complete geometry for space and time and called it "The Spacetime Continuum". If we perform measurements that require extreme accuracy and accountability for the data, we must use Relativity to compensate for the inadequacy of our time reference. Since the equations do not exclude time reversal or time acceleration, the SiFi writers and some scientist proclaimed that Einstein states in his theory of Relativity that "Time Travel" is possible. It is not always wise to literally interpret mathematical terms as reality.

Newton produced his works within the framework of a single immutable concept of time. There are no physical devices or objects in the universe capable of truly representing this concept of time under all conditions of motion and therefore we use Einstein’s “Theory of Relativity” to allow us to perform comparative measurements of motion. The mathematics we use to do this however; produces illusions that time itself is an entity of the universe when interpreted literally – it is NOT. Time, like any measured phenomena is referred to as being a dimension. We do not elevate length, width, and depth to entity status; why would we elevate time to such a status?

Time is a pure abstract concept created to allow us to communicate the notion of moving objects. Without a constant repetitive motion situation, we are unable to truly define “Absolute Time” by using a physical reference. The Toronic concept, like Newton, uses the concept of a universal time or “Absolute Time”. Applying Toronic concepts to scientific measurements however, will still require the use of Relativity or the requirements of quantum physics. Absolute time only shows that the illusion of time travel is only in the interpretation of the math and not a product of reality.

Absolute Time as a mathematical term, is a one-dimensional invariant expanding vector – it only proceeds forward and its point of reference is always the present even though we never truly experience the exact present point. Forget about the grandfather paradox or righting the wrongs of the past. Past events cannot be changed and no physical entity can move from the present to the past or future regardless of the velocity of the object. Time travel is an overrated illusion produced by the mathematical modeling process just as time dilation is. To an observer, physical clocks would behave as the mathematics predict and the aging process may change but not due to a true slowing of absolute time. These are the result of the effects of motion and not the result of a variable time entity that changes its cyclic increment relative to motion. Clocks do that!

The mind has the ability to carry our thoughts beyond the limits imposed by nature on our science of measurement. When using this marvelous ability of the mind, we should not carry our thoughts beyond the limits of nature itself. This should only be applied to our SiFi entertainment fantasies. Our greatest problem here is knowing the limits of nature.

Absolute Matter:
Unlike time and space, matter does not have an intuitive axiomatic concept or definition. Again let’s see the dictionary definition.

Matter (n) Something that occupies space and can be perceived by one or more senses; a physical body or the universe as a whole. Physics; An entity displaying gravitation and inertia when at rest as well as when in motion.

This definition implies an intuitive understanding of our universe and infers that matter cannot exist without displaying gravitation and inertia at some condition of rest and motion. Let's provide an absolute definition for matter and state that "Matter is the fundamental substance of the universe". This doesn't seem to invoke awe and amazement, but it does invoke a vision of something that everything is made of and this is the only physical stuff of the universe. As such we must redefine our notions of mass and energy.

Absolute Matter (n) The fundamental substance of which all physical entities acquire form and existence. Only the Void exists as a separate entity within an infinite cosmos.

To assign physical properties to a phenomena under this definition, you need to define the physical (physics) mechanics of actions and interaction of matter. This demands cause-and-effect, as opposed to only using empirical data of measurements in producing a mathematical equation to allow us to predict events and motions of material objects. This basically was science before the proliferation of positivism and the abuse of Relativity by media and pseudo science.


Absolute Space, and Absolute Matter, are the fundamental absolutes that define real existence. Absolute Time is a conceptual absolute needed to define our next two absolutes - the properties of matter.

Absolute Bonding:
Matter has its own bonding. It does not require the existence of any Elmore's Glue-All or any gluon particle to have it stick to itself; it only requires contact to exist for this bonding property to take effect. Obviously motion plays a significant role in determining the bonding effectiveness and strength. Besides contact, the points of interface contact must equate to near zero relative motion. Think of two spheres of fundamental matter rotating in opposite direction at the same velocity. If they make side by side contact (Fig 2.1 .left) and the period of contact is adequate, the bonding property of this substance would manifest a bonding of the two units. If this occurs with the rotation moving in the same directions, (Fig 2.1 .right) the contact would probably result in the spheres deflecting off each other or under the right conditions, would cause their orientations to change prior to the bonding. Though it is not quite this simple in reality, this will be adequate for now.

This Absolute Bonding property of matter is "Self-affinity". This property is the essential property of matter that allows all particles and structures to form. All the bonding terms currently defined in chemistry and physics rely on this property to function. This also includes electrical and magnetic bonding. This is only the fundamental nature of the property; the behavior of self-affinity is influenced by the states of matter and its motion distribution of which the wave nature is a significant part of its function.

Absolute Motion:
There is only one pseudo new concept in the Toronic hypothesis that allows everything to function in harmony and makes all of nature’s magic tricks visible for all to see and understand. This is "Absolute Motion". This is not the absolute motion referred to when Einstein stated "Absolute Motion cannot be determined"; even though this too may be true of it. A form of Absolute Motion is expressed in many equations including Einstein's energy equation. Without this property of matter, all the conservation laws of physics that we have place so much faith in, would collapse and chaos would rein as ruler of the universe.

So what is nature’s big illusion of smoke and mirrors? Other than volume and self-affinity, Absolute Motion (Va) is the only other property of matter. It is a fixed quantity that defines the sum quantity of all motion types of a physical system or structure of matter. This motion consists of "Random Motion (Vr)” and “Uniform Motion (Vu)". Linear velocity and spin velocity are types of uniform motion whereas chaotic wave vibration interference is the random motion component and the nature of matter that is illusive to our senses and to our instrumentation. We have come to know this state of matter as a vacuum, space, or spacetime.

When we establish the product of uniform motion and the mass value of a body or object, we define the results as "Momentum". Since we do not have a means to detect Random Motion of matter to any degree of accuracy, we are unable to measure a mass value for quantities of matter in this state of randomized motion. There have been many attempts to define matter with only this form of motion; Vacuum energy, dark energy, and zero point energy are just a few of the more popular concepts.

The motion quantity of any system equates to "Absolute motion".
Va = Vr + Vu

It may seem like a simple equation (as was E=mc2) at this level, but when we try to incorporate "Time" and "Matter" into this equation along with the infinite variations and combinations of uniform and randomized motion, the complexity expands exponential. We enter a realm of which we start questioning the quantitative measurements of matter and energy themselves. Now we need to journey through the evolution of the universe from its start to its current state of structure and motion. ]]> dleviwing http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/54-toronics-d-levi-wing.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/53-toronics-d-levi-wing.html Thu, 16 Nov 2006 21:09:21 GMT _Interpretations of Physics:_ We have come a long way from the Galilean methodology of physics and even further from Newtonian classical concepts of physics. We have advanced our science discipline to delve deep within the hart of physical matter and structure. Our science has evolved to such an... Interpretations of Physics:
We have come a long way from the Galilean methodology of physics and even further from Newtonian classical concepts of physics. We have advanced our science discipline to delve deep within the hart of physical matter and structure. Our science has evolved to such an advanced level of physics it requires a lifetime of dedication to become proficient in its application and understanding. How could we possibly hope to comprehend the magic and mystery of our universe without the intense years of academic study. Is there any way to interpret the numbers into a simplified examination that can be understood by the masses. I believe it can be done.

Many authors of science texts that cover Relativity and Quantum theory, tend to dedicate significant amounts of their books to the history of physics and not enough to the actual meaning of the terminology used by theoretical physics. What is meant when we say force, charge, energy, dimensions, gravity, and so on? What is the physical mechanism that accounts for the cause of the observed effects or phenomena?

Often we hear the phrase that "it is just common sense". Common sense would infer that there is something called "common knowledge"; This surely does not apply when discussing theoretical physics. So were do we define the demarcation line between common sense and advanced comprehension skills? – is it a seventh grade level, a high school level, or some level of college? Should we expect someone with a high school level of physics to be able to comprehend the interpretations of Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, or even M-theory?

Before we entered high school physics, we understood that if something was dropped from a height above the Earth, it would fall faster and faster before hitting the ground. We may not have understood the precision of the rate of acceleration but we had the common sense to know not to jump from tall buildings by understanding the paradigm of this principle of acceleration. With a little more understanding of fundamental terminology of physics, we can achieve a fundamental understanding of the more advanced theories even though we may never achieve the mathematical skills to present them formally. This is the paradigm of interpretation needed to understand what the numbers are telling us. Unfortunately this paradigm is not even known to physicist attempting to translate the mathematical language to the spoken language used by the rest of us. Toronics is an attempt to bridge this gap between common language and the mathematical numbers.

The most significant realization within the Toronic paradigm was the nature and meaning of the physics term "mass". This alone answers many of the nagging questions of science today. The missing mass of the universe; The increased acceleration of the universe; Black holes; and many others. Just as Einstein's energy equation brought forth a more comprehensive understanding of radiation, the one new concept of Toronics links the forces of nature to one fundamental cause-and-effect interaction of the stuff that the universe is made of.

The Terms of Measure:
Throughout the history of science we have created terminology to define various phenomena we measure. The most commonly known terms in theoretical physics are mass ,energy, gravity, force, motion, space, and time. There are however, several thousand more distributed throughout the many branches of science. These terminologies are the measured or defined phenomena that we observe. Our world of scientific terminology is enormous and complex beyond the full comprehension of any single individual and yet we seek a link of simplicity that will place them into a universal mathematical concept.
Though many science writers and scientist themselves are attempting to inject a level of subjective truth to the philosophy of physics and science, it would be wise to disregard these views as attempt to convert science into a religion. Science is based solely on our ability to perform measurements and obtain empirical data to support a belief called a hypotheses or theory. Once we inject a subjective interpretation into our discipline, the nature of science changes to one of faith and belief dictated by the temples of wisdom and knowledge. Even though we may reach a level that is beyond our ability to test and measure, it is far better to say we "don't know" than to inject superstition or supernatural subjective views into our science. We are now in a phase of science that is attempting to proclaim prominent theories as proven facts when they are far from any level of acceptable scientific proof. Though much of the mathematics function, the interpretive paradigm is too bizarre to warrant acceptance. We may continue to use the math but we must not proclaim knowing the meaning of the numbers until we have a physical paradigm that is rational and simplistic; One that smoothly combines Relativity and Quantum physics to explain why the mathematics work. This is the goal of " The Toronic Concept of Our Physical Universe".

The process of using a myriad of terms to describe our universe has lead to the development of mathematical models of our universe called gauge theories. Relativity, Quantum Physics, and String theory are the current models vying for top billing. These theories are not defining reality, they are defining quantities of various mathematical values and terms used in the process of experimental measurements. Only when we are able to trace these terms to fundamental absolutes, will we truly understand reality. Once we reach the understanding of absolutes, we will have the fundamental causality of the universe. At this point we will have only one questions unanswered; “Did existence come into being or has it always been?”

The ideal scientific goal is to find a fundamental common concept that will reduce all our measurements and mathematical equations to a simple an unique paradigm of physical philosophy. This philosophy will provide the logical path from the start of our universe and hold true through any and all phenomena to the present state of the cosmos. We understand the philosophy behind the workings of a computer by reducing it to the fundamental idea of a switch position of "ON" or "OFF". Regardless of how complex a computer seems to be, the root philosophy remains simple and can be followed into all aspects of the computer and its programming. The ideal concept behind the workings of the universe must also have a similar simplicity at its fundamental root.

Most of our knowledge of the universe and how it functions is based on the state of the material substance of the universe, its structure, and its interactions. We have often heard mentioned by scientist that the laws of physics, as we know them, may not apply to the substance of the Big Bang or to the matter within the depths of a black hole. It may be that the laws of physics as we know them, only apply to the fundamental substance of the universe when it has achieved structure as atomic and subatomic particles. It would appear that we really do not know the fundamental laws that govern the behavior of a singularity, or the fundamental stuff of the universe and its functions. What are the basic tools of nature needed to create such remarkable vistas? We may find that the answer is not any more complex than that of an ON/OFF state of a switch when understanding the behavior and properties of a computer. The laws of physics and nature must be true for all levels and states of the universe without exception. What defines the actions of the atomic structure must also apply to black holes, stars, particles, and to the event that created this universe. Any exceptions to the a law makes that law invalid. Expansion cannot be an exception to the speed of light in a vacuum as being the ultimate velocity. The velocity attributed to expansion is the ultimate velocity and must apply to all states of matter in the universe. This is "Absolute Motion" and is the motion quantity of all physical systems in the universe.

Dimensions and Entities:
Dimensions are parameters and terms that are derived from quantitative measurements.
Why do so many SiFi movies embrace the idea of dimensions as a way to add mystery and awe to their scripts and create suspenseful plots? Could it be the fact that the general public have been lead to believe existence is entwined with other dimensional realms of reality that coexist with the one we call our own universe? Our scientific notions for some, seem to be wandering into the stomping grounds reserved for our religious faiths.
The true concept and meaning of dimensions infers a parameter or term that is the result of a quantitative measurement. Length, width, and depth are dimensions that allow us to depict distances; together they depict volume. Time is a measured quantity and thus is a dimension. Mass is a measured quantity and thus is a dimension. Energy is a measured quantity and thus it too is a dimension. Of course many dimensions are determined indirectly by knowing the values of other dimensions. Knowing a quantity of energy allows us to determine a quantity of mass and visa versa.

There are only two types of entities of existence; physical entities and nonphysical entities.
Unfortunately we often view our mathematics as if the term on the left side of the equation is representing an entity or fundamental of the universe. This often leads to an abstract concept such that energy, force, time and so on, are independent and autonomous entities of the universe. There are only two types of entities; physical entities that are objects of a fundamental physical substance, and nonphysical entities that are attributes of the fundamental physical substance or the void partially occupied by our universe.
When interpreting the meaning of our abstract mathematical theories an their terms, it is extremely important to question: "Are we interpreting an entity or a dimension?" If we apply this philosophy to all our science terminology, we find that our science is virtually and exclusively comprised of terms that depict only dimensions and seldom any real entities. This makes perfect sense since our science is based on the process of measurement. Thus the interpretations of these measurements should have a paradigm that describes the entities of substance and their attributes rather than proclaiming dimensions as entities. This is what leads to the fundamental absolutes of Toronics.

Energy and mass are dimensions of matter; what do the numbers really mean? Why does energy convert to mass and mass to energy? These may seem to be simple questions and maybe you may think they have already been answered. The truth is, they have not been satisfactorily answered and they are quite profound concepts. These are the cornerstones of our Standard Model of modern theoretical physics. The concepts presented by the Toronic Hypotheses is intended to provide a fundamental understanding of these terms that will remove the mystery and allow science to move into the next realm of a paradigm shift of interpretation. ]]> dleviwing http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/53-toronics-d-levi-wing.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/52-toronics-d-levi-wing.html Wed, 15 Nov 2006 01:01:59 GMT PREFACE:
If your goal is to create a Unified Field Theory by developing a mathematical model that combines the mathematics of "The Theory of Relativity" and "Quantum Mechanics", you may just be overlooking what is already developed. The problem may not be with the mathematics of these theories, but with the interpretation of the mathematical terms and numbers produced by these theories. Our theoretical physicist seems to be fixated on discovering a new mathematical expression that will solve all the anomalies of our current Standard Models. Rather than creating more complex math, let's take another look at the paradigm we use to interpret them into our view of reality. Let's have equations match reality and existence be a rational paradigm; keep science fiction out of science fact. In science, fact is not stranger than fiction.

Theoretical physics has advanced to a phase indicating a truly unbelievable universe. Is the right side of our brain unable to comprehend the complexities of nature and form a logical perception of nature's fundamental secrets? Does the ability to understand existence lie only in the few with the remarkable ability to jump beyond the confines of reality and into multiple dimensions of existence? Is this leading to what some believe, that our science is becoming another religion with its authorities of the word? Some may believe so, but the fact is, the scientists are also confused by these theories. Few scientists accept the assertion of real time movement to the past or future. Few believe alternate dimensions of existence. So why is it the mathematics indicate such strange goings-on. It is not the mathematics; it is primarily the over active imaginations that have translated these mathematical terms into concepts of physical reality.

The mainstream media and even several reputable science journals expend time and text to the oddities of our most comprehensive gauge theories and very little to the true functionality value of these theories. More time is exhausted promoting concepts of “Time Travel”, “Multiple Universes”, and several other improbable realities extracted from “Relativity” and “Quantum Physics” rather than emphasizing the useful applications and successes of these theories such as the advances in technology. The general population usually obtains their information from mainstream media and of course, TV. This results in many people being awed by the science and others who believe scientist are absolute intellectual morons.

Modern theories are not so much perceptual in nature today as they are mathematical. Thus, mathematically, science has combined the four forces of nature using these theories. However, each of these theories have encountered phenomena that irritate the right side of our brain – They challenge logic. Some scientist sooth this irritation by dismissing the phenomena and becoming content that “if the mathematics work, it does not make a difference as to what is real. Is reality as complex and abstract as the mathematics seem to indicate? Are there physical dimensions that exist beyond the known three dimensions of our universe? Science requires a perceptual paradigm of reality that explains the universe in absolute fundamental concepts that do not border the realms of metaphysics and religion.
D. Levi Wing ]]> dleviwing http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/dleviwing/52-toronics-d-levi-wing.html