Welcome to the ToeQuest.
View RSS Feed

Lloyd Gillespie's Blog

Thanks RP, Good Advise...

Rate this Entry
by , 04-03-2010 at 12:56 PM (68 Views)
And finally, when we hear the word ‘energy’, we all have an intuitive idea about what this word means, but it remains ambiguous, overused and undefined. Please don’t say ‘energy is equal to mass times C squared’, or mC squared is the maximum kinetic ‘energy’ of some mass ‘m’. Chemical energy, light energy, electric energy all have an intuitive meaning to each of us. But ‘energy’ is a made up word to describe something we really don’t understand. I really wish the word ‘energy’ could be removed from all scientific thought and vanish from all scientific papers. When I read posts on this site that give explanations of behaviors noted in nature, one can tell if the author has any knowledge about the subject being discussed by counting the number of times they use the word ‘energy’. In general, the more I see word being used, the less the author knows about the subject presented.

The study of expansion behavior functions explains the formation of mass, the strong and weak force, gravity, light, galactic formation and time itself. Yet, it is not taught in most universities for it shakes the foundation of current physics and lets the cat out of the bag. Science needs to be shaken to the core so the ambiguities and phony concepts can be discarded. Describe all of natures’ behavior in the basics, flux, impulse, acceleration, velocity, distance, surface area, volume and time. These factors are all that are needed to understand all the unknowns left by the current standard model.


Do the work, get the knowledge.

Happy thoughts…………Q7
Categories
Uncategorized
Back to top