Lloyd Gillespie's Blog

Originally Posted by dleviwing

NO I DID NOT STATE THAT.

Eric;
Please stay with the dictionary definitions. Eternal and infinite are not the same.
Eternal (adj) without beginning or end.
Infinite (adj) having no boundaries or limits (beyond measure)
Finite (adj) having bounds: limited: (measurable)

The cosmological void: Eternal and infinite
Fundamental matter: Eternal and finite
Motion of Fundamental Matter: Eternal and finite.
The universe: FINITE

Do not replace the word matter with mass; they are not the same. See Dimensions and Entities. Matter HAS MASS. Mass is a measured dimension of matter relating to the property of inertia. Prior to the event that caused our universe, mass was a meaningless dimension; mathematically it would produce an infinite value. That’s why the math is misleading. Do not replace the Absolute Void with space; they are not the same.

Frankly I have no idea of what you are trying to say with “The juncture between infinite potential and the finite "expression" of potential”. It’s like what I call many current M-theory explanations – intellectual gibberish except the intellectual is missing. I believe you are creating unnecessary complexity.

Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie

David, this is partly correct, as to the void is infinite, and matter is spread throughout this infinity, but the early universe, before the first singularity, had no electromagnetic wave aether___just thermal wave matter___only___and linear only. Electromagnetic wave aether would require quantumized angular wave matter___this had not yet happened, in the early universe___before first singularity quantumizer. I completely agree with this statement; "All fundamental laws must sustain validity without exceptions to time or location."

regards,