Welcome to the ToeQuest.
View RSS Feed

Lloyd Gillespie's Blog

East Meets West Logic...

Rate this Entry
by , 08-22-2010 at 08:04 PM (344 Views)
Quote Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie View Post
Hi Leskey, thought I’d expand a bit further on your thoughts in this post, as I see both sides of the mind making vast mistakes of processing, not only its own information, but not understanding the information potential of the opposite sides of its chosen mental states. Imo, reason sees not only not enough of its own position, but even sees far less of logic’s position, and logic sees not only not enough of its own position, but even sees far less of reason’s position__and herein lies all our dis-agreements…

Now, right here is what I’m talking about. Due to the fact the mind of either hemisphere has access to the full processing capacity of both sides, it’s not the fact logic processes as you state. The fact is that some choose to process as stated above, while others of even the logic side choose to process the mind fully, while prioritizing the left hemisphere over the right, while others of the logic side may prioritize the importance of both hemispheres, it’s usually quite impossible to make this point, as the right hemisphere, due to its personal preferences, will only see what it wants of what is actually said or written, due to its own incapacities(choice or habit) to integrate the two hemispheres, themselves. So, there’s a great problem of both sides self-prejudicing their own information systems.

One more item for the reason side to recognize is the fact that logic processes it’s information to the ‘systems survival level’ and realizes the ‘systems comfort level’, of the reason mind, is an option, just as decorations on a Christmass tree. Now, this may seem crude to the right brained individual, but the right brained individual usually doesn’t realize its information of the ‘systems comfort level’ must be processed up to the ‘systems survival level’ of the logic mind, for the logic mind to even begin to hear the reason mind. The reason mind doesn’t usually realize this fact, and ends complaining about the logic mind not listening to them, when in fact the logic mind is just waiting for the reason mind to realize it must present fully formed law of its desires, to be of value to the ‘systems survival level’ of social action. And this, the right brained reasoning level of the ‘systems comfort level’ usually refuses to do. Also, the reasoning level mind needs to know and understand the ‘systems survival level’ mind to be affective/effective with its legislative attempts__It can’t be just super-ficial emotional values__It must be ‘true scientific survival values’, for the ‘systems survival level’ logic mind to even begin to listen, to the ‘systems comfort level’ reason mind. I’ve even mentioned this to many people in the general public, through the years, yet most do not even begin to understand what I’m actually saying__But, these are the facts, as bad as the right brained individual may want to dispute them.

And here the same goes for the right side reasoning as the left side statement above. Though the reasoning side may process from present to future, it always has the same full capacity to process all past to future states into the present, but it just doesn’t choose to. This is completely a personal choice, as the will which acts the intellect and emotions, is a quantum induction process, right at the initial uncertainty level of original thought choices. One always has the full choice to initially choose which side of the mind to process information from, or both, or all three, by unifying these processes. So, it seems it’s just an initial self-prejudice that’s creating all the problems. So, the simple solution would be to broaden the perspective of the will’s own self-processing choices. This is easily done if one just recognizes their own initial choices, which I mentioned way back in this thread, and was clearly laid out in this diagram: Link Notice, in the top center box, the isomorphic choice between psychology and logic, at the very uncertainty level of initial choice function. It’s also mentioned in many more of my related graphics, spread all throughout this thread, and my philosophy thread__but, people see and hear what they want to, instead of what is__And herein lies humanity’s greatest of problems…

And as I already stated: We’re all waiting for the unification of left and right hemispheres, but everyone seems to think someone else must do it, instead of it being a universal effort by all of us, to expand our own mind’s processing scope__to include just as much of the opposing views, as our own__Then maybe, we can all start communicating a bit more maturely, by seeing and hearing all others. And don’t get me wrong Lesley__We are all guilty of this, and all have been ignoring the greater reasoning modalities, and greater logic modalities of the opposing sides__as a matter of fact upon just realizing__reasoning modalities have never been fully developed as a study, to successfully compete with modal logic’s reasonings__This must be done…rrr
Categories
Uncategorized

Comments

  1. leskey's Avatar
    Hi, Lloyd. I've noted several of your recent re-posts.

    In My Observation, the 'evolution of mind' will occur when it is realized HOW we don't use our brains efficiently or optimally. The common perception of emotion is literally the consquence of a cross-wired brain. The functional roles are reversed, resulting in enmeshing the mind in the oscillations of dysfunction, inertia, or high impedence.

    Emotions are thought to be bilaterally controlled. They should be conscious, logical, localized variation with the aim to constructively initiate new connectivity through empathic action, ie creating dynamic new pathways through experience. This is genuine love.

    Left brain logic is ego-centric: the inward processing function of perceived observation, sensation and experience, or "WHY." The meter of logic is innately selfish and without empathy (or compassionate experience) therefore incapable of initiating the appropriate (outward) HOW-applications or actions for optimum connectivity.

    Right brain reason is motive or the outward application function, 'HOW.' Rather than utilizing the HOW-application for inward processing, especially to perceive emotion ("How could you do this to me?"), it should be utilized to action genuine love (as described above, ie "I forgive you."). In this context emotion is the tool of the 'HOW'-application. Reason should not process 'WHY,' because it substitutes logic with the opacity (or 'high impedence') of emotion rendering it incapable of effectively processing or quantizing incoming observation, sensation and experience.

    To use an analogy...

    REVERSE OSMOSIS:
    A filtration process that removes dissolved salts and metallic ions from water by forcing it through a semipermeable membrane.

    Reversing brain function, would reduce psychological stress and improve efficiency and physical health.

    SOURCE:

    ION CHANNEL FLOW RATES:

    The rate of ion flow through an open ion channel depends on:
    The concentration gradient across the plasma membrane.

    The voltage gradient across the plasma membrane.

    The conductance of the ion channels, which is expressed in units of charge/second per volt. A high conductance channel allows more ionic flow for a given driving voltage than a low conductance channel.

    Opening may lead to either inward current generation, leading to depolarisation;outward current generation, leading to hyperpolarisation; or increased conductance, leading to stabilisation of membrane potential.

    Closure may lead to either switching off of the inward current, leading to hyperpolarisation; switching off of the outward current, leading to depolarisation; or reduced conductance, leading to increased sensitivity of the cell to other components.


    Binary processing (positive and negative) co-operates to connect.

    Put simply, 'Wisdom' in thought and deed results solely from re-wiring the brain to coherently filter input to output.

    This is explained to the best of my ability. It is at the root of much of what I post, Lloyd. The fundamental dysfunction of the way we think obstructs the 'action-potential' of consciousness. 'Reverse osmosis' would enable pure consciousness to stay connected and 'flow' as it should.
Back to top