Lloyd Gillespie's Blog

Originally Posted by dleviwing

PD;
Let me present a few facts about Einstein’s Relativity. First of all it is indeed solely based on measured quantities so you are quite wrong in stating that it is not. It is a subjective methodology of measure that predicts how observers in different reference frames (states of motion) will perceive the same event. This is the premise of “Special Relativity” and it is represented by non-linear mathematical geometry. “General Relativity” presents mass as a further distortion of this non-linear

...

Originally Posted by dleviwing

My use of the word “toron” was long before it became part of M-theory; March 1968 to be more exact. I’ve repeated myself many times on ToeQuest but find it difficult to overcome all the false evidence contributed to Relativity.

Very few on ToeQuest realize the importance of seeing that science is a methodology based purely on our ability to perform measure and need to separate the methodology from the physical reality. Too many allow the math to dictate their view of reality.

...

Originally Posted by Steven A Colyer

There are 3 kinds of space:

1) Negative Space - Take one step forward in Negative Space and you end up a step behind. Can be handled mathematically, but is pure Fantasy. Doesn't exist, or at the very least has never been observed. There IS something called Negative Energy, but that's a completely different subject.

2) Normal Space - where we live. If there isn't something in Normal Space, a "nothing," there won't be for long. The entire universe in entangled

...

Originally Posted by Graybeard

Amazon has this book, second hand for a $1.87 (58 copies left)

CLICK

cool bananas ... greg

Originally Posted by Steven A Colyer

The exact quote from Feynman I believe is "My graduate students don't understand Quantum Mechanics because I don't understand Quantum Mechanics!"

Feynman of course was a joker. He probably knew QM better than anyone else in his time.

This is a difficult subject, no lie, therefore introduction into the subject is key. I found Kenneth Ford's book on the subject to be very good, then I found the best website of all in understanding it when I looked up Quantum entanglement

...