RascalPuff's Blog

THE JUDICIAL, JOURNALISTIC & Rogue C.I.A. Inspired
“CODE OF SILENCE” In Santa Cruz County, CA.

A Memorial Record Of The Murder Of Corine Christensen In 1986
THE DEATH & REBIRTH OF JUSTICE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
Sequel To the Conquest, Rape, Murder & Resurrection Of Columbia In The United States
Copyright © 1996, 2001 & 2007 by Kent Benjamin Robertson

IN COLD PRINT
Cocaine Feedback & Homicidal ‘Blowback’:

When Two Murderously Guilty Men Mysteriously Become ‘Not Guilty’
November 4, 1986, the Santa Cruz SENTINEL reports Corine Anne Christensen, 34, is found dead of a point-blank inflicted .38 caliber gunshot wound just beside her left nostril. This discovery occurs 36 hours after James Marino and Richard Wayne Bandler (and no others) were in her Live Oak residence, bitterly arguing and snorting a lot of cocaine. Marino will later testify that Bandler introduced him to and trained him for a large quantity of cocaine dealing and trafficking, encompassing national distribution, via commercial air traffic accessed, trans continental clientele and ‘innerCircle connections’.

Future newspaper reports and trial testimony reveal that Ms. Christensen was Bandler’s bookkeeper as well as prostitute for hire, to Bandler’s much controversied, protectively concealed ‘V.I.P. innerCircle’, and that Ms. Christensen rationed Richard Bandler’s personal ingestion of cocaine to “one ounce per week”.

Departing Ms. Christensen’s home, the two men drove to the end of the Capitola wharf, where Marino says he complied with Bandler’s order to throw the weapon into the ocean from the pier. The two men then parted each other’s company (Sheriff’s divers later recover the weapon, exactly where Marino described it to be).

A day and a half later, James Marino went to his lawyer, Kate Wells, and reported the above, telling her he ‘hopes it’s a dream’. Marino’s lawyer sends her (at that time) husband to Ms. Christensen’s house, whereupon he returns from the scene to inform Mr. Marino that his report was not a ‘dream’. The police are called in at this time. Bandler will later testify that he spent his day and a half in bed, snorting a lot of cocaine with one of his two girlfriends. When asked why he didn’t report the crime, he replied that he “intended to do so”, after he’d “cleared his head.”

Marino says Bandler shot her. Bandler says Marino shot her. Each man says he witnessed the murder, and both affirm that there are no other suspects. Officials determine post facto that, in the 36 hour interval between the murder of Ms. Christensen and the police reportage of that fact, the victim’s entire domicile had been elaborately ransacked; in what was clearly a thorough search of her home and all of its contents. Including a ripped open teddy bear and the care-free dishevelment of her personal effects. Testimony and reports from and among Bandler ‘associates’, revealed wide knowledge that Ms. Christensen routinely sequestered large amounts of book-keeping data, cash and cocaine, in an office safe in her house. All of this material was disappeared; without explanation...

Another motive for the desperate and thorough search, was a need to dispose of highly classified and incriminating information that Ms. Christensen recorded on her computer; with corroborating discs and audio tapes, which had - along with large amounts of cash - been stolen from her home, in the 36 hour period of non-reportage.

Ms. Christensen was described at trial as having been a ‘high class prostitute’; having many sordid relationships with ‘a lot of important people’. Abundant testimony reveals that numerous persons fully aware that Ms. Chrisenen not only kept Bandler’s nuerolinguistic programming (N.L.P.) industry’s financial accounts, receipts, etc.’ she was also known to keep notes and audio tapes on and about her ‘clientele’. These included large quantity cocaine buyers, as well as prostitutional ‘Johns’.

It is also revealed that Ms. Christensen and James Marino each, routinely ‘bugged’ the other’s residence; including bedrooms, by ‘wireless microphone’ installations. Thereby obtaining ‘classified’ recordings of each other. Much of the friction in Ms. Christensen’s relationship with Bandler and Marino had to do therefore, not so much with sex or drugs, but rather more importantly with informational intelligence about a large number of significant persons and criminal activities.

Neither the court testimonials or the press spared Ms. Christensen or her family and friends details, such as how many dildos (female sex toys) she owned, and how many male as well as female clients she may have used them on. The jury and press learn that she sometimes serviced as many as seven clients daily (‘dominatrix’, ‘insatiable sexual appetite’, ‘lesbian’, ‘bi-sexual’). This lurid and personal information served as killer deathspeak relish in diminising her perceived value and increasing her perceived expendability. Having already admitted that he never stopped being one of her ‘many lovers’ for the past several years, Marino did not abstain from posthumously calling her a ‘kinky sicko’. None of these derisive, posthumous descriptions of the victim were objected to, halted, or stricken from the record.

November 6 1986. The Santa Cruz SENTINEL reports that Richard Bandler is singularly accused as the only suspect. Marino is not charged with anything at all and granted immunity against drug charges, ‘in exchange for his testimony’, opposing ‘the only suspect’ - Mr. Bandler. County District Attorney assigned prosecutor, Gary Fry, is new in Santa Cruz, to jockey the first and only murder trial of his career at that time (He is now a federal prosecutor). In contrast, Bandler’s defense attorney, Gerald Scheartzbach, is a seasoned and highly skilled defense attorney.

LAWYERS, GUNS & MONEY, continued
December 21 1986. San Jose MERCURY News, WEST Magazine article, written by the Santa Cruz SENTINEL’s Tom Long: “Bail Is Reduced For Slaying Suspect: Saying that he had been presented with the most impressive letters of reference he had seen in his career, Municipal Court Judge Richard Kessel reduced the amount of bail for murder suspect and psychotherapist Richard Bandler, from $500,000.00 to $100,000.00 Friday afternoon. Kessel made his decision in a courtroom crowded with Bandler’s supporters. To augment his appeal (for lower bail), Schwartzbach (Bandler’s defense attorney) had delivered to the judge a thick stack of reference letters from (unnamed, incognito veiled) sources including doctors, a member of Army Intelligence, Vietnam veterans, Sheriff’s deputies and others. “I fully expect that he will be out next week.”, Schwartzbach optimistically concluded.

The SENTINEL will cover this case for 15 months, from November 1986 to January 1988, when Bandler is found ‘not guilty’. In this time period, four judges will preside over and handle the case, beginning with preliminary trial Judge Tom Kelly, then Judges Marlo and Kessel; finally with Judge Cottle presiding over the jury trial.

On April 22 1987, the SENTINEL quotes Judge Tom Kelly twice, saying: “THE ONLY THING I KNOW BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IS THAT THE MURDERER (defendant Bandler or witness Marino) WAS HERE IN THIS COURTROOM.” This Kelly quote is repeated in bold print as a by-line heading, and then again in lower case typeface. November 3, 1987, the SENTINEL, in subjecting James Marino, dubiously pronounces him “the key witness for the defense and the prosecution”. (The pinnacle of duplicity.)

May 8 1987, the SENTINEL reports Kelly, repeating his unsurety of ‘who the murderer is’ (in consideration of defendant Bandler, or witness, Marino). Note that Marino is not called a ‘suspect’, while at the same time he is openly perceived and boldly alluded to as such; by many persons. Certainly including Judge Tom Kelly: who drives this schizoid point home from the beginning of the preliminary trial hearings, through the middle and to the very bitter end of this case and its accompanying trial and controversy. Judge Kelly adds grotesquely: “The evidence is flimsey in this (preliminary trial hearing) case, but enough to order Bandler to stand trial.”

Two and a half weeks later, on 27 May ‘87, the SENTINEL quotes Judge Tom Kelly again, saying: “THE ONLY THING I KNOW BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IS THAT THE MURDERER WAS IN THIS COURTROOM.” Taking this renewed opportunity to reiterate his redundancy, Judge Kelly does not fail to once again, amazingly proclaim as ‘flimsey’, the case against Bandler - ‘the only suspect’.

Note, that preliminary trial Judge Kelly dwells upon and repeatedly belabors the consistent usage of the singular, in always referring to ‘the guilty man’, and, ‘the murderer’, while copiously lamenting his indecision about whether ‘the defendant’, or ‘the key witness for the prosecution and the defense’, is the toasting answer to the fired up question of who did it. Of course, THE YET UNSELECTED JURY IS ROUTINELY READING THIS, from the local press; at breakfast, lunch and dinner.

COFFEE, TEA & N.L.P. Continued
Judge Kelly will continue to be SENTINEL documented, expressing his interminably elongated dilemma about whether the guilty man is Richard Bandler, or James Marino. The former is on trial. The latter is uncharged. (The crown and vertex of intrigue saturated, duplicitous Orwellean DoubleTalk and NewSpeak.)

On the other hand, the only immunity Marino has been (very peculiarly and impertinently) granted, is against any drug charges that might otherwise result from his (‘star witness’) testimony.

The plurally suspect defendants are reduced to a singular. The unabashed testimony and confirmation from both Bandler and Marino, about their very large cocaine and cash dealings with very important and exotic (ever anonymous) people, is heedlessly flaunted with reckless abandon, throughout the intrigue and duplicity saturated trial.

July 30 1987. The SENTINEL: “Papers Missing In Bandler Case”. A judge must determine what to do this morning, about original court documents missing from the court file, in the Richard Bandler (‘psychoProgramming’) murder case. Seven volumes of transcripts are missing from the official court file (One daily, for the first seven days of the preliminary trial) from the preliminary hearing for Bandler, a noted nuerolinguistic programming pioneer, charged with killing a Capitola prostitute (not ‘murdering a woman’, or ‘bookkeeper for the locally active, rogue C.I.A. cocaine traffickers’, or ‘person who knew too much about too many very important and ponderous - ever anonymous - people’). Bandler’s (jury) trial is set for November 2nd (‘87), in Superior Court.

“Kenni Lopez, who supervises the clerks in the Superior Court Clerk’s office, says an office wide search has failed to turn up the transcripts. This is the first time, she said, that such a document has been missing. She and County Clerk Richard Bedal fear the papers may have been deliberately taken from the file. Removal of such documents they say, is a felony.”

July 31 1987. The SENTINEL: “Bandler Judge Wants A Copy Made Of Missing Papers. A judge ordered a copy be made of the District Attorney’s transcript of Richard Bandler’s preliminary trial hearing, to serve as the official court document in the murder case. The knotty problem came to court Thursday morning, because the official seven volumes of the preliminary hearing are missing from the court record. They were removed (later reports will cite a non-descript elderly woman as having ‘walked out’ with the supposedly guarded, unreplaceable original papers) from the file in the Superior Court Clerk’s Office, shortly after they were transcribed by the court reporter, earlier this month. Judge John Marlo (makes the 3rd judge acting in this case) ruled Thursday, that the new (District Attorney’s) copy will serve as the official transcript (in place of the official court transcript; apparently against which no comparison is available or can be made)”.

THE NAUGHTY PROBLEM, continued
The above article leaves it to the reader’s wherewithal and/or imagination to fathom the difference between the missing (stolen) transcripts, and the replacement record’s from the District Attorney’s (Arthur Danner’s) Office. No comparative explanation is offered, leaving the unanswered question: exactly how are missing, original court transcribed documents, replaced with records from the D.A.’s office? To ‘serve as the official transcript’ - which it patently is not.

November 8 1987. San Jose MERCURY News, WEST Magazine:
“MIND OVER MURDER”, by Kathy Holub (excerpts follow):
“He (Bandler) started working with the U.S. Army and the Central Intelligence Agency, doing projects on post Vietnam stress syndrome (P.T.S.D. - post traumatic stress disorder. Certainly not confined to Vietnam veterans, or the military experience, or this century or millennium, for that matter. It’s a newly acknowledged science, less than twenty years old <at the time of this 1997 writing>; of evaluating and measuring ongoing mental disorders originally imparted by severe psychological and/or physical trauma), and marksmanship (especially with handguns - Bandler owns eleven pistols). Kathy Holub’s prophetically self-fulfilling, neurolinguistically programming title - MIND OVER MURDER - continues:

“He did some highly sensitive work for the C.I.A. on training potential hostages to withstand torture and interrogation.

“Kate Wells, a local (*formerly Bandler’s) attorney (*the newspapers never say that), remembers sitting in his (Bandler’s) apartment one day, ‘With the three top C.I.A. agents in the country (Neither Wells or the Mercury News article provides their names). They were like this with Richard. She (Wells) makes a goggling face. ‘They were in awe of him. They would have done anything to please him. Sitting in his cruddy little living room in Capitola. It was surreal’”.

Kathy Holub’s MIND OVER MURDER, also offers that Corine Christensen ‘had one source of legal income - bookkeeping for Bandler and NLP (nuerolinguistic programming - the much over-rated, scientifically disclaimed industry Bandler was profitably pioneering. It doesn’t say Christensen was a ‘bookkeeper for the locally active rogue C.I.A. cocaine traffickers’, here).”

It is repeated many times and in slightly varying phraseology, in an assortment of newspaper articles on this case, that the murder was motivated by drugs and sexual tensions, having nothing to do with Bandler’s work in N.L.P., Army Intelligence or the C.I.A. chiefs he was hob-nobbing with in his home (a few houses down from the murder scene): as though the murder was unrelated to Ms. Christensen’s prostitutional relationship with who knows how many persons of what social station (the paramount issue of the identities of the often touted ‘important people’ is never pursued in this case).
Kathy Holub continues in MIND OVER MURDER - “Bandler and Christensen were freinds , not lovers. But Bandler often hired her to have sex with his friends.”

More of Judge Tom Kelly’s iniquitous quotes emerge newsworthy (The key to nuerolinguistic brainwashing is repetition; especially by recognised authority, such as Judge Kelly, and large, massively distributing news agencies, continued).
San Jose MERCURY News WEST Magazine, 8 November 1987 (Excerpts follow):
“My mind went back and forth all week,” he (Judge shuttle-brain) said, about which man was guilty.” He would order the case to (jury) trial he said, but so far the evidence seemed *‘skimpy’ (for the third time; the first two times Kelly used the word *‘flimsey’). Judge Kelly goes on to publicly state, yet once again, also for the third time: “THE ONLY THING I KNOW FOR SURE BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT, IS WE HAD A MURDERER IN THIS COURT ROOM THE LAST WEEK AND A HALF. BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT I CANNOT TELL YOU WHO THAT PERSON WAS.”

Intrigue and duplicity: ‘That person’, ‘The murderer’, ‘the guilty man’, ‘My mind went back and forth’ (between ‘the only suspect’ - the defendant, and the uncharged, drug traffic immunized, newspaper celebrated ‘star witness’).

Always the uniformly militant, repetitiously exercised usage of the singular, in ascribing to one man, the compound responsibility for the ‘skimpily evidenced’, marginally important murder of Capitola prostitute, Corine ‘Kinky Sicko’ Christensen. This makes three different publicized reports from Judge Kelly, saying thrice, the same dualistically shifty things about the two men at the murder scene.

The disappearance of large amounts of cocaine and cash, as well as evidence critical to the case and highly classified information from Christensen’s pillage-ravaged home - what, and who, this case is really all about - is minimally issued, un- pursued by the court and the newspapers.

Two weeks later, 27 November 1987, SENTINEL reporter, Mark Bergstrom, yet again, for the fourth time, quotes Judge Kelly with exactly the same quotes as above. Bergstrom artistically volunteers furthermore:
“Beneath all the trappings of N.L.P., cocaine and sex are the real crux of the case. It’s a WHODUNIT.”
‘All the trappings of N.L.P.’ is Army Intelligence and the rogue Central Intelligence Agency, which Mr. Bergstrom makes perfectly clear, have nothing to do with ‘the real crux of the case’; which Bergstrom crystally clears to be cocaine and sex. ‘Not having to do’ with grievously incriminating information, involving scores, perhaps hundreds of ‘very important innerCircle people’: distributing and receiving large amounts of feloniously obtained cash and cocaine, by nationally commuting commercial air traffic. No indeed. It is a publicly inventoried dildo guilded, bi-sexual dominitrixing, seven daily tricking, kinky sicko, sex and drugs propelled (rock and rollex) WHODUNIT. For absolutely surex.

Hierarchical Death From Above
Whereas, the alleged ‘WHODUNIT’ proves out to be is a how many dunit; for what many reasons, of Ms. Christensen’s direct knowledge, documentation and forensic proof of the insidious and unnamed elements orbiting this case and it’s ominously minimized and ignored magnitude. Certainly exhibiting N.L.P. repetition tactics from Judge Kelly and others, by way of the vehicularized media reportage. Especially by the ever pliant and actively complicit SENTINEL, with stand-in freelancers, similarly unleashed in the San Jose MERCURY News. All a matter of ineradicable record, precisely reflected in this somewhat narratively styled, purely documentary anthology.

Only-lines-on-paper, finding ‘Chief Prosecutor’ Arthur Danner’s highly reputed fortress of impregnability laid to its own self destructive waste, in fact, for at least the past ten years it is now. It would all be B.S. and/or obsessive and meager opinion, were it not the recorded newspaper history and court minutes of the rogue C.I.A. infested Bandler Marino case: ‘prosecuted’ by Santa Cruz County’s District Attorney’s office, via Gary Fry - a district attorney Art Danner-summoned new arrival in town (now a federal judge), handling his first murder case. Between 4 November 1986 and 29 January 1988.

“NUEROLINGUISTIC GURU PERFORMS ACT OF GENIUS AT SEMINAR”
Newspaper articles throughout this trial reflect a long history of Bandler’s carrying concealed firearms, brandishing and pulling them on people - especially women - accompanied by threats, and imposing the muzzle in, or near, their face(s). On one particular occasion, he did this under the witnessship of hundreds of people attending one of his early ‘80’s N.L.P. seminars. Bandler would later explain that it had to do with a finer point of his N.L.P. ‘persuasive tactics’. His supporters (and Bandler sports a revealing abundance of them) called this diabolically cheap shot, ‘an act of genius’.

TEA & BULLETS
( If 6 Was 9: Cleans 2 The UltraShine )
The forensic ‘blowback’ of the victim’s blood and other tissue was, according to Bandler, deposited - sprayed, ‘aerosol effected’ - on him, because he was seated next to Ms. Christensen when Marino shot her. Marino testified that blood and other tissue blowback was on Bandler, because he (Bandler) shot her. Opposing forensic pathologist’s testimonies on behalf of the defense and the prosecution are grid-locked in argument before the jury, on this cross-eyed WHODUNIT, ‘blow-back’ tissue issue.
Blowback Forensics & Kitchen Sink Sanitary Engineering, cont.
Even Judge - AC-DC - Kelly is sure Corine Christensen was shot in the face at point blank range, between one half inch and five inches of distance from point of impact. The only continuously burning, suspense packed question in this skimpy-flimsey case is WHODUNIT. Each man testified that the other was at Ms. SevenTrick’s kitchen sink, brilliantly improvising a MR. CLEAN plastic detergent bottle as a silencer; and that the makeshift effort was abandoned and therefore, not employed in the murder (execution).

The jury heard an audiotape of Richard Bandler arguing bitterly with Ms. Sexually Insatiablesen, threatening to blow her brains out, in those words. The audio tape evidence was bonafide to have been recorded four hours before the defendant and the ‘star witness’ departed the house with the unimportantly murdered, expertly testimonialised and thingified, lesbian sex and drug toy, abandoned therein.

Whether Bandler and/or Marino marauderously scoured and sacked Ms. Christensen’s house, or whether someone else did, is an unanswered - generally unpursued - question, throughout this trial. Wherein, both the prosecution and the defense display a minimum interest in this crucial matter of 36 hours worth of time (the better part of the first weekend of November 1986): to go through all of her domicile and belongings. Including her missing computer, bookkeeping and clientele list for cocaine and sex purchases; as well as abundant personal notes, along with many very personal audiotapes of unnamed, numberless persons. On the other hand, the jury does learn of - is closely updated on - her priortized sex toy inventory, and how many ever-anonymous persons she serviced, daily. Yes. Her heinous murder was further extended, in court, even after she was terminated. This shrewdly offered informational necromancy was not (even) stricken from the hydrophobically foaming record. Extended, for the mesmerized jury’s, stoically stunned ‘evaluation’.

DIVING INTO THE (Invisible ‘What?’) SEETHING WRECK, continued:
The cocaine and sexual activities were not anywhere near as crucial to her murder as was the factor of information - Who, What, Where, Why and How... All poignantly disappeared at the taking of Ms. Christensen’s young, ostensibly misguided life. Corine Ann Christensen, the bookkeeper, neighbor and rent-out - completely expendable, ‘pest like’ - party girl, for Richard Bandler’s awe inspired, V.I.P. friends. Vanguard’s of Bandler’s nuerolinguistic programming enterprises. An untitled, localised, precedent setting C.I.A. PsyWar program. (Not pogrom?)

POST GRADUATE CRAZY-MAKING AT THE INSANITY FACTORY
N.L.P. (Neurolinguistic Programming). The opportunistically advantageous, alternating art of not taking ‘no’, ‘yes’, or reality, for an answer. Persuading others to practice this Orwellean s’kill on others, and for those converts to likewise persuade others, and so on... Refer stonewalling, satanism, and the ‘war of perception’ - Nazi science. Bastardized B.F. Skinnerism slowly turning on a spit, over flaming copies of FARENHEIT 451, and the best works of Pavlov, Freud, Adler and Jung. Richard Bandler’s C.I.A. spearhead of destructive behavior modification and operant conditioning experiments on the public. In this particular case, on all the newspaper reading public in Santa Cruz county - VooDoo psychotherapeutics. Perilously Yellow Journalism, out of the (Orwellean) ‘Ministries of Truth and Justice.’

(Time magazine’s January 1st 1984 ‘Feature Article’ commented on George Orwell’s 1984: “The author’s <Orwell’s> predictions are ridiculous”. Incontrovertible proof that George Orwell was not only correct, but that he himself underestimated how accurate he would prove to be. <Orwell’s 1984 extinctifies books and accurate, unrevised history. Whereas, Huxley’s BRAVE NEW WORLD extinctifies motivational reading interest.> Speaking of TIME magazine’s 1 January 1984 feature article, calling Orwell’s predictions ‘ridiculous’ - add this: TIME-LIFE publishers ‘independently purchased’ and sat upon the Zapruder film - the hardest evidence in the JFK assassination - for 13 years. Finally releasing it to the public, under the Jimmy Carter administration, in 1976...)

The wary Santa Cruz SENTINEL is on guard, tirelessly expanding the parameters of the public’s tolerance threshholds. In time, they’ll be ready for the O.J. Simpsonization of the nation. Where reality will again, be diversionarily omitted and otherwise disregarded - cited for lack of political correctness. Where palpable culpability will again be omitted, disfigured and/or side-lined for ‘lack of evidence’. Where, all that is wanted is an *honorable end to the O.J.Simpson trial (*beginning with the Vietnam war).’ Where reality is a television mesmerized nation of shell-shocked people who can’t access the evidence for the murder of their own president, until the year 2027. (The N.L.P. inspired, popularly circulated JIFFYFIX for this and all other major, ongoing cover-ups is: ‘The people don’t want to know the truth’ <J.F.K shot himself>.)

Corine Christensen? Richard Bandler & James Marino? Ho hum. What difference does it make? The bitch deserved it. Rhubarb rhubarb. Chill out. Until the next time. and the easier and more sleep inducing, channel-changing time after that. Squared. (Refer, attention span contraction, and tolerance threshhold expansion, a War Of Perception.) Just don’t complain too much (Shut up!), or the cheap shooting C.I.A. tentacles may fire up - and/or drown you, or yours, also: at high noon; in the public- official sanctioned and festivity normalised, celebrity-surrounded, community swimming pool. Making damned sure your submersibly buried, generously condemned and demonized body doesn’t ‘embarassingly’ surface, amidst any of the surrounding, elitist, formally attired, aloof whine and cheeser party pleasers.

James Marino’s vaunted ‘immunity’ extends only to any drug charges that might otherwise be applied to his testimony. The moment he admitted he disposed of the murder weapon at Bandler’s instruction (knowing it was the murder weapon) - in that moment, Marino became an accessory to and after the fact; as guilty as Bandler, under the law. Upon this admission of disposal and concealment, the mind manipulating, show stealing WHODUNIT question of ‘which man pulled the trigger?’, is factually reduced to a mere technicality.
In accordance with presented testimony, argument and evidence, both men are equally guilty. Equally convictable. Equally punishable under the law.

Sunday, 17 January 1988. Santa Cruz SENTINEL. “In one of his many published writings, Bandler said NLP can be applied to jury trials”.
The SENTINEL didn’t say NLP can be applied via its own exemplary newspaper articles, readying the yet unselected jury - to be drawn from the community that is massively pre-peppered with those repeatedly crazy-making articles)... “Bandler testified last week that C.I.A. and other government representatives once attended one of his NLP seminars in Washington, D.C.” (Note the added, muted salute, in the parting allusion to more, subordinately awe inspired, Wa. D.C.-based authority figures...)

January 27 1988. Santa Cruz SENTINEL: “BANDLER NOT GUILTY.”
The defendant was found not guilty; by a jury which had been assembled months after repeatedly reading of Judge Tom Kelly’s (and other’s) endemically advertised quandary of ‘which (singular) man did it’.

IN YOUR FACE, continued:
January 29 1988. Santa Cruz SENTINEL: “Somebody has (not ‘two and more people have’) just gotten away with murder. Only two other people were in the room when a Capitola woman was shot to death in November of ‘86. One of them, Richard Bandler, was acquitted of the charge late Thursday afternoon... “The other, James Marino, was the prosecution’s (thank your lucky?) ‘star witness’. (On 3 November, ‘87, the SENTINEL described Marino as ‘the star witness for both the prosecution and the defense’ - and those are mighty damned good odds.)

The 29 January, ‘88 SENTINEL continues: “The sad part for us is, there were only two people there, and we couldn’t come up with anything for sure,” said one of the jurors who acquitted Bandler of 1st degree murder after a two month trial. The jury deliberated for less than six hours. “I found it very difficult to believe Marino”, said a juror. “Others on the jury, he said, “felt strongly that Bandler had pulled the trigger. But we had to follow the rules, and there was reasonable doubt”, the juror said. He pointed out that Judge Chris Cottle instructed them, that if there were two reasonable explanations for events, the jury was bound to accept the one that pointed to Bandlers *innocence (*sic. There is no ‘innocent man’ to protect, here. This is how it was done. A new twist on the old axiom, ‘divide - superfluously bifurcate, dichotomise - and conquer’. Attack the language/ communication itself: unvarnished Orwellean QUACKSPEAK).

“Bandler took the witness stand during the trial and said that although he had threatened to blow Christensen’s brains out just a few hours before the killing (murder), it was Marino who pulled the trigger.”

Assistant D.A. Gary Fry said after the verdict, that he will not prosecute Marino for the murder. “We can’t . We have to have evidence, and as much speculation as people may have, we don’t have evidence against Mr. Marino,” Fry said. (An enormously simulated beguilement. A flopper-whopping lie. “We don’t have evidence against *Mr. Marino.” *Proved himself accessory to the fact, in admitting he concealed the murder weapon, in throwing it off the Capitola pier...)

Bandler was speechless after the verdict. it came so swiftly it caught everybody by surprise...” “The quickness of the verdict spoke to the quality of the prosecution’s (‘flimsey’) case”, said Schwartzbach (Bandler’s defense attorney.) “The evidence showed he did not commit the crime.” (Lee Harvey Oswald may have shot her from the 6th floor of the Texas Book depository?)

Judge Tom Kelly’s function on over a half dozen occasions of SENTINEL preliminary trial coverage, being read by the community from which the forthcoming jury will be selected, is to always singularize ‘the suspect’; to confine this 3-dimensional murder to 1 dimension. As though there are not two - and more - suspects. As though there are not two and more accessories to murder. As though there are not two - and more - guilty men. As though the press and appointed jurisprudent representation, was not accessory to and after, the murderously self-revealing fact(s).

LET’S GO THROUGH THE HOOD WINKING MOTIONS
(‘Let’s Pretend’), continued:
As though the District Attorney - County Chief Prosecutor - did not assign a rookie prosecutor from out of town (later promoted to a federal prosecutor status). As though Marino was and remains immune to murder charges. As though Marino did not prove himself guilty when he admitted disposing of the murder weapon. Its recovery proving exactly where he said he concealed it. (“We can’t prosecute Mr. Marino. We have only speculative evidence against him.” - an NLP inspired, enormously bold and equally transparent lie.) As though it was necessary to grant drug charge immunity to (‘make a deal’ with) Marino, in exchange for his testimony.

As though the two - and more - men did not conspire to murder Christensen; because, as Bandler’s N.L.P. bookkeeper and prostitute for hire to his skulking, ever anonymous ‘friends’, she had not, as a deliberately predestined ‘outsider’, become an increasingly perilous, innerCircle perceived security risk. Having growing knowledge and hard, abundant evidence of far too much incriminating and/or highly volatile, highly classified information, about far too many insidious people, in (and out) of ‘the (richly flaunted, awe inspiring, criminally fugitive) intelligence community’; extending in and out of Bandler’s Live Oak-Capitola apartment, and the second floor of the local, county, state and federal government building at 701 Ocean Street, for example.

DRUGS CZAR U.S.
(It would all be B.S. if it wasn’t true, continued.)
The entire single defendant proceedings are a contrived and ruthless farce, from the outset and continuingly. Duplicitous bifurcations, diversive brachiations and dichotomisations (infinitive issue splitting); deliberate focus on one man as a suspect, while simultaneously and ambiguously alluding and detouring also, to another suspected but uncharged, equally guilty man. From the beginning of the proceedings. Pure 1984 plagiarized NEWSPEAK (Refer, ‘N.L.P.’).

Both Bandler and Marino murdered her. For their own vulnerability; for what she knew and could prove about both of them, and a consistently unidentified and uncounted host of their very spooky, eerie; ominously unidentified ‘company’; solemnly influencing the press, the court, its officers and of course, all the repeatedly stunned and abused jurists themselves. Literally, figuratively and virtually, the entire community was dazzled and intimidated; via the adroitly utilized, spell bindingly mainline local press.

(Everybody get down! The rogue C.I.A. is on the town!)
it is against all American laws for the C.I.A. (rogue or pristine) to operate in domestic (national) affairs, inside the continental limits of the U.S. Having been doing so, with unfettered impunity, since 22 November 1963, in Dallas, Texas. Burying this country in hard drugs and domestic violence, street crime, endemic mass murders, and blaming it on - and/or hugely lying about it (‘The crime rate is actually going down’) to - the public at large, ever since. A MOVEABLE VIETNAM: A Continental Misunderstanding (The war against the American people, by rogue - corporate state and entertainment industry supported - government, at local, state and federal levels).

DENIAL IS MORE - And Less- THAN A LARGE RIVER IN NORTH AFRICA
The original court transcripts of the preliminary trial contained affluent and pre-eminent proof of witnesses, testimony and other evidences that were not even considered in, and were omitted from the main jury trial. Hence, the preliminary trial minutes had to be disappeared and/or seriously altered, in order not to comparatively appear in glaring disagreement with the onerous facade of justice that became the jury trial, and its veritably demonic ‘resolution’.

DENIAL IS A Crystalline Snow STORM OVER THE N.L.P.-Buried UNITED STATES
Excluded witnesses, testimony and evidence includes the Creager brothers, Floyd and Harry; who were prevented from testifying at the jury trial, on the false premise of being protected - on standby as important witnesses for the prosecution - and harbored at the HOLIDAY INN, a few hundred feet from the courtroom they were carefully disallowed from entering; while simultaneously being told and promised that their testimony was vitally important to the prosecution’s case, and that their testimonial appearance was imminent. Their ‘protectors’ were plain clothed, pistol packing representatives of the District Attorney’s office, they said.

In the 36 hour period between the murder and its police reportage, Richard Bandler offered Floyd Creager (an unemployed Vietnam veteran, suffering from post traumatic stress disorder; a personal friend of the record) a job as a ‘body guard’; volunteering to provide a firearms permit (for concealed weapon), and a pistol. Bandler withdrew the offer to Creager, shortly after he (Bandler) suggested it. Clearly, it was an aborted intention to implicate and frame a third party (Floyd Creager); for the murder that Bandler and Marino had just committed, but not yet reported. This testimony by Floyd Creager of these facts, was never heard-by, or known to, the jury.

Harry Creager, on the other hand, is the former boyfriend of the woman Bandler planned children with. Some of Bandler’s stepchildren were fathered by Harry Creager, who, because of his connection to Bandler, through his (now former) girlfriend, learned and knew a lot about Bandler’s personal life and business activities. Harry Creager never testified-to, or was known-of, by any of the Bandler-Marino trial jurists. Through his relationship with Harry Creager’s former girlfriend, Bandler became familiar with the the Creager brothers, knowing of Floyd Creager’s pronounced vulnerability, as a potential ‘patsy’...

Bandler’s inclusive motive for murdering Christensen, according to Harry Creager, is because Christensen was Bandler’s commonlaw wife’s main source of cocaine supply; which Bandler did not want her (his planned wife and mother of his planned children - marriage and children being very important to Bandler) to ingest during her pregnancies. This motive, also, was never presented to or known by the jury.

In 15 months and 49 articles of SENTINEL and MERCURY News reportage on this sensational and sleaze festooned murder case, District Attorney and Chief Prosecutor Arthur Danner’s name is never mentioned publicly, and he is never reported as making any comments whatsoever about it.

NO PROBLEM IS RESOLVABLE WHEN SURROUNDED BY DENIAL (= grid-lock)
The elimination, omission, obscuration and/or diminishment of witnesses, testimony and evidence (alternately favoring the prosecution or the defense, depending on what trial is being ‘fixed’ for who, this time), is the favored tactic and freely wielded signature of the self-serving, N.L.P. Smash Hit Emperor of Santa Cruz County, Arthur - ‘Squeeky’ - ReverseTheCharges - Danner III. Having David Copperfielded major witnesses, testimony and evidence, along with the constitution of the United States and the Statue of Liberty.

Murder is perfectly legal in Santa Cruz county. All you need is a thick enough stack of glowing, Geiger counter gagging letters of recommendation, from large enough groups of Very Important People, Army Intelligence Officers, and nine dildos, proven beyond a reasonable doubt to have been the well used property of a widely known bi-sexual dominatrix-lesbian bookkeeper and call girl (The SENTINEL finally refers to her as a ‘woman’, on the triumphant day Bandler is acquitted). The overwhelmed jurists, no longer, seeing, hearing, understanding, feeling or knowing what they used to understand, see, hear, feel and know. (Paging Ms. Misogyny?)

“Orwell’s Predictions Are Ridiculous”, TIME magazine, 1/1/’84, continued:
No one in the D.A.’s Office for example - no one in the heart of political correctness, would be caught dead on the witness stand, being morally judgemental about any of this. It wouldn’t be prudent (and who knows who the rogue CIA might waste and rigor mortise, in a floored and overturned chair for 36 hours, next)... The guilt saturated, over-sexed victim was, after all, publicly reported as being in the act of snorting a line of rock & rollex ‘recreational nose kandy’ (among the most insidiously destructive illegal drugs in the U.S.) at the precisely kosMickarMick moment Ms. Quacko was sooper mysteriously whacked.
Arthur - Reverse The Charges - Danner was definitely ‘out of the loop’, on this one, warm-gun-wise. The Chief County Prosecutor is not responsible for what he is responsible for.

Clean, Swift & Silent as a (36 hour, boudoir delayed) police dog whistle.
“CODE OF SILENCE”:
A Covert, Conspiratorial Agreement To Betray Overt Oaths Of Public Office

POST SCRIPT
Mr. Danner’s VICTIM WITNESS PROGRAM
is the recipient of the GOVERNOR’S (Wilson’s) AWARD FOR EXCELLENCE

What Art Danner does for an earth scorching encore.
A Few Final Words From The Local Ministries Of Truth & Justice continued:
July 1990. SENTINEL. Regarding Santa Cruz County court minutes relating to the bygone, ‘resolved’ Bandler-Marino trial: “All forensic (physical) evidence was destroyed, by order of the judge.” / “It’s fine with me, said prosecutor Gary Fry, “I want to put that case behind me.”
And so it is. Directly behind him. The instrument of Art Danner’s own undoi

Reich & Wong (Some things neve change), continued:
7 April 1995, on page A-1, SENTINEL staff writer May Wong covered Danner, attending the Los Angeles ‘media circus’, surrounding the O.J. Simpson case: ‘Danner said he also spoke (on CNN) about how he believes the Simpson case will force changes in the criminal justice system.’ (What EYE suspects): “I suspect that people will say, ‘Heck. We’ve got to find another way to get closer to the truth’”, Danner said.

“Not surprisingly”, reporter Wong adds, “Danner blamed defense attorneys for going to the media and raising irrelevant issues.” Well. That settles it. Danner mentioned ‘the Trailside Murder Case’ and other issues; never breathing a word of what may be the most sensational and important case in county homicidal history. Certainly a rogue CIA linked ‘domestic murder’ case, of capital import.

Arthur Danner is also under long standing charges (that he feloniously will not allow to be filed against himself or any other of many cited co-offenders) for his 15 year, actively ongoing participation in a locally active, rogue C.I.A.-motivated, N.L.P. practicing pedophile cult, stationed out of Los Angeles. Originated by the feloniously fugitive Richard (“Call me ‘Big Brother D#ck’ - ‘Why don’t you call the police?!”) Robertson, vice president of DPM COMPUTERS; listed in the L.A. Yellow Pages.

AFTERWARD
The propounded ousting of Mr. Danner sometimes evokes an impotent objection that he may be replaced by someone worse - thereby gutlessly forsaking the democratically principled example that must be made in the preservation of democracy, by expelling and punishing tyrants. Danner’s replacement would in such action, receive solemnly necessary notice, that the same can indeed happen to any malrepesentative of publicly empowered office. And, so it could. So far, no such (sorely overdue) notice has been adequately recognized.

Evoking the Jeffersonian axiom: “Those who do not oppose tyranny, are self condemned to live under it.”
Likewise cogently relevant here, is the same former president’s advise:
“The price of liberty, is eternally vigilant struggle.” (Paraphrased)
..............................
About The Author:
The 56 year old, 5’7”, 140# Eurasian, S.S.I. disabled record is an ordained Military Chaplain, and a V.F.W. (Veterans Of Foreign Wars) Chief Warrant Security Officer - one of the two co-founders of V.F.W. Bill Motto - Wage Peace - Post 5888. With no serious police record whatsoever. Never legally charged, let alone convicted of any felony.

District Attorney Art Danner III, has, in the past 15 and more years, arraigned this record five times, for charges including ‘threatening his life (this case was ‘dismissed in the interests of justice’), and an unrelated charge for ‘battery’, against nine veterans - much younger and larger than the record, in a 36 month period (‘83 - ‘86); wherein Danner has lost all five arraignments (all signed by Danner with no other complainants), including a jury trial for battery, against three maverick veterans younger and larger than this record - the only jury trial ever converged on Mr. Robertson - also lost by Danner and his malanthropically wild eyed confederates. Danner’s latest failed prosecution of this record was between May and October of ‘96, when he falsely charged this record with ‘felony cultivation of marijuana’. The case was dismissed - under Judge K. Akao - before it went to trial.


_____


DANNER’S LIST. Anthologised by Bob LaMonica
9 June, 1987. Under many witnesses, Mr. Danner consumes a gin and tonic and part of a second over 45 minute period, prior to colliding head-on into another vehicle, driven by Sandra Larsen, who sustains serious head injuries. Larsen is given a field sobriety test in the emergency room, her blood was ‘analyzed in elaborate tests’; shows no trace of alcohol or drugs.

Mr. Danner is not given a field sobriety or blood test. A diagram attached to the (police) report shows the accident was ‘front end to front end’, and is called ‘a fender-bender’, that occurred when Danner attempted to turn left (out of the JURY ROOM bar’s parking lot on Ocean Street, across from the court house and Gvt. Bldg.) into oncoming traffic.” (Going the wrong way down a ONE WAY STREET.) Three months later, Mr. Danner is cited for ‘failure to yield right of way’.

Mr. Danner settled out of court with Ms. Sandra Larsen, for $20,000.00 bodily damages. The SENTINEL newspaper delayed reportage of this ($20,000.00 ‘fender bending’) event for two weeks. The incident occurred just prior to a county election, and in the midst of the preliminary trial of Bandler-Marino, in the Corine Christensen murder case (as documented in ‘The “Code Of Silence” In Santa Cruz County).
- San Jose Mercury News, 12 June 1990

Mr. Danner hires in late 1985, Tehama County Deputy District Attorney Christine McGuire, who had prosecuted against her public defender and romantic partner, a violent felony case. The conviction was reversed by Appellate opinion citing “sustained dating relationship with the prosecutor”.
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury Complaint, 27 October 1994

Mr. Danner assigns prosecutor Anna Matheson to Municipal court Judge Tom Kelly’s courtroom for six months in 1986, when an extra-martial affair between them was ‘common knowledge.” Mr. Danner calls allegations of impropriety, “ridiculous”.
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL, 23 September 1994

Mr. Danner assigns from 1988 to 1989, Mary Margaret Bierbaum, ‘level 3’ prosecutor, to the Major Narcotics Vendor Program, in violation of Major Narcotics Vendor Grant requirements that participating deputy prosecutors be of ‘level 4’ status.
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury complaint, 27 October 1989

Jason A. Hopkins, son of Jon Hopkins, Santa Cruz County Chief Deputy District Attorney, is arrested and booked in county jail on charges of possession for sale of psilocybin mushrooms, 18 March 1988. Decision arranged with Attorney General’s Office not to file charges. Mr. Danner states “It was handled like any other case.”
- San Jose MERCURY News, 31 January 1989

Mr. Danner orders investigation of Gary Patton during 1990 supervisor’s re-election campaign. Charges of using County typewriter for campaign purposes surface. Mr. Danner asks Mr. Patton to reimburse County for a typewriter ribbon, which he (Patton) does. - Santa Cruz SENTINEL, 5 December 1994.


Mr. Danner has felony charges of Subordination of perjury involving three California Highway Patrol officers (who obliterate from records traffic citation issued to John Geringer in late 1991) reduced to misdemeanor status, disposed out of court, behind closed doors. - Santa Cruz Grand Jury complaint, 27 October 1994.

Mr. Danner decides not to prosecute Sheriff’s Officer Todd Liberty for excessive use of force against George Nichols. Mr. Nichols, who states he would have settled “for an apology and a handshake,” sues. Federal judge views video of the 1991 incident, grants summary judgement of $390,000.00 to Mr. Nichols. Total loss to County including legal fees: about $500,000.00
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury complaint. 27 October 1994

Mr. Danner’s function as Public Administrator, which resolves estate and property issues, with power to sieze assets and rule on competence, has raised major questions in numerous cases. - Several public sources have raised this issue.

Mr. Danner, in violation of procedural rights, quietly banishes 11 year director of Victim Witness Program, Judy Osborn, to kitchen of District Attorney headquarters at Watsonville Courthouse, without desk, telephone or computer, August 1993. Ms. Osborn is prohibited from sending or receiving mail. Ms. Osborn succombs to stress, goes on medical leave in December 1993
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury complaint, 27 October 199

Mr. Danner chooses to keep investigation within District Attorney’s office when Harper’s Magazine “C-NET” police brutality tape surfaces in late 1993, referring matter to Attorney General months later when publicity grew heavy.
- Santa Cruz County Grand Jury complaint. 27 October 1994.

Citing ‘violation of due process’, May 1994 Appelate Court ruling reverses 1991 Santa Cruz County murder convictions of John and Chris Badgett. Defense attorneys charge Mr. Danner with “dragging the case in the sewer”, and “serious misconduct”. Mr. Danner calls ruling “hyper-technical”. - Santa Cruz METRO newspaper. 26 May ‘94.

Mr. Danner arranges County vehicle in addition to $5,400.00 travel allowance for his Chief Investigator, Alan Johnson, until situation surfaces in September 1994..
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper, 12 December 1994

Mr. Danner grants immunity to John Hamre in exchange for information on stabbing death of Christian Brown, 29 June 1994. After cooperation, Mr. Danner withdraws grant of immunity, charging Hamre with accessory to murder, Judge Bill Kelsay later dismissed charge. - Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper. 19 october 1994

Tara Fawett is arrested, 3 September 1994 in connection with drive-by shooting, booked into County jail on charges of accessory to attempted murder and drunken driving. Louis Rittenhouse, Tara Fawcett’s stepfather, calls Mr. Danner regarding the matter. Mr. Danner calls Judge Tom Kelly. $250,000.00 bail is dropped . Ms. Fawcett is released. “The contact we had with the councilman (Rittenhouse) had no impact on why we made the decision,” said Mr. Danner.
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper. 15 September 1994

Mr. Danner takes a $1,600 trip to Washington, D.C. to attend Crime Bill signing. In a September 12, 1994 letter (the day he left) Mr. Danner submits requests for travel reimbursement. County rules require approval in advance. On September 13 (the day after he left), County Board Of Supervisors vote 4-1 to approve the trip, after the District Attorney is already arrived in Washington, via stolen County funds.
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper, 18 September 1994

Mr. Danner places Assistant District Attorney Catherine Gardner on administrative leave, 18 March 1994, then fires her on 20 July. Time cards are falsified at Mr. Danner’s direction for 17 weeks at full pay (including benefits, about $30,000.00). When Ms. Gardner demands a civil service hearing, the covered-up, falsified timecards surface. Mr. Danner asserts he has the authority to go against County code. Mr. Danner responds to Auditor-Controller Gary Knudson’s preliminary report on the matter with “I may just decide I’ve had enough and decide what to do legally,” saying he might sue Mr. Knudson if his final report is not, according to Mr. Danner, legally correct. On 6 December 1994, Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors vote 4-1 to take no action against Mr. Danner. Outgoing Sheriff Al Noren says “I think the (supervisory) board fell flat on their asses - or faces.”
- San Jose MERCURY news, 17 October 1994;
Santa Cruz SENTINEL, 7 & 8 December, 1994

“The Borland Amendment”:
Gordon Eubanks, CEO of Cupertino based Symantec Corp., and Eugene Wang are charged with stealing trade secrets from Wang’s former employer, Borland, in 1992. Defense attorneys suggest “Maybe the case should have been investigated by somebody independent”, since Borland is a Santa Cruz County company.

Mr. Danner calls comment “lawyer’s tricks.” Hearings uncover that the District Attorney’s office had accepted $13,00.00 from Borland to defray cost of investigation, and that Jonathan Rivers, a key investigator on the case, went to work for Borland days after Santa Cruz County Grand Jury had indicted Wang and Eubanks in February 1993. On 23 August 1993, Judge Bill Kelsay disqualifies the District Attorney from prosecuting the case, stating “rather strong evidence of a reasonable possibility of compromise of prosecutorial discretion” and, “If the District Attorney’s office continues with this prosecution, they (District Attorney officials) will be on trial”.

Mr. Danner responds “We agree. The judge was wrong.”
- Santa Cruz SENTINEL newspaper. 6 March, 24 August & 8 September 1993
___

A FORMAL COMPLAINT
TO THE SANTA CRUZ COUNTY GRAND JURY
TO: The Grand Jury of Santa Cruz County From: *Kent Benjamin Robertson
(Former case number CC99-102)
19 August 2000
The Judicial, Journalistic, Veterans Administration & ROGUE C.I.A.
INSPIRED CODE OF SILENCE In Santa Cruz County. Part III
A Case History.
Urgent Introductory Note: this formal complaint was originally submitted to the Grand Jury of 99 - 2000. Then assigned as CC99-102. It is modified and revisionally edited for re-submission and re-address to the Grand Jury of 2000-2001, for highly qualified, documented and self-explicitly clarified reasons provided, forthwith. It was firstly submitted 27 July, 99. Condensed and re-submitted 28 September, 99. Foreperson Al Richard's responded, 19 October, ‘99, that the submitted complaint 'does not meet the required guidelines of a complaint; leaving no alternative but to close the case as presented.' Also reminding the complainant that the issued complaint, 'has to be in the Grand Jury's jurisdiction'.

As though this complaint was not qualified as such, and/or might not be in the Grand Jury's jurisdiction. Foreperson Richard's brief letter also explained that four (of nineteen jurists, including five alternative) chairs constituted a Crime Committee, that disqualified the submitted complaint. Intimating that only 4 of 19 Grand Jury members received or knew of the complaint. The record requested then (and still respectfully requests) instructions as to how the alleged 'unmet guidelines' can be satisfactorily fulfilled. Without response from the previous Grand Jury. For - in this case - unjustified reasons, 15 of 19 formerly incumbent, now adjourned jury members had no knowledge of this complaint for the first eight months following its 7/27/ ‘99 submission. Incorrect reasons for closure of this case are unequivocally manifest in the foregoing. In accordance with redress of grievances, under the 1st Amendment. of the US. constitution. Complainant requests a response, including the assignment of a new case number to corroborate this resubmitted case. (To the Grand Jury of 2000 - 2001.)

Thanking you for consideration of this formal complaint to the Grand Jury of 2000 - 2001 (ut infra), I am very respectfully and gratefully yours, Kent Benjamin Robertson. 28 September, 1999 Re: Grand Jury Case *CC99 - 102

Re-submitted complaint follows:
In response to notice from Grand Jury, dated 15 September and received, 18 September, 99, Sat. (on permanent file) Please note: The (previous) Grand Jury forepersons (Al Richard's) letter also states a preference for a one page complaint. But this is not a requirement (as the formal Complaint Form - Civ. GJ 1 Rev. 3/ 95, itself clarifies: 'If more space is required, continue on reverse side and if necessary, attach extra sheets to this complaint form.' ). Complainant defers to the lengthy history, abundance and diversity of Mr. Danner's criminal actions and their culpably self incriminated, government busting and belaboring, infrastructural administrative tributaries. The consequent requirement here, for multiple pages of description, constituting this complaint. Mr. Danner's trespasses and those of his criminal complicitors and participatory accessories are extensive. Herein (as CC99-102) severely abbreviated (now re-submitted to the Grand Jury of 2000 - 2001 as CC00-005). While maintaining highly qualified documentation and specificity. In lieu of more specific requirements, requests and/or instructions from the Grand Jury; from whom the record implores understanding.


There are many individual abuses, and many individual abusers of office here, to investigate, gainsay, reprimand, correct, charge, and/or indict. Be reminded: These problems and their ingenuously causal *hosts have a recent (if already ominously obscure) history of overwhelming, criminally paralyzing; then terminating a sitting county Grand Jury.

The Grand Jury of 96 -97 went extinct months before completing its obligatory, state senate law required year of incumbency. Due to a series of voluntary resignations. For reasons of intrigue and duplicity imposed upon Grand Jury membership(s) by their justice obstructing *legal advisors in key county government stations (*as below listed; marked with asterisks). As explained in the foregoing.

State law requires each county to have a Grand Jury in place at all times. How that Grand Jury is further instrumentalized is at the advisory and instructional binding discretion(s) of the below listed, cited, county government employed offenders. Each cited official a proven nemesis unto his and herself. Tampering with and otherwise illegally advising and instructing the Grand Jury: having become their proven, justice-evading policy since the sinister extinctification of the Grand Jury of 96 - 97. Emerged again over the Grand Jury of 99 - 2000 in the insidious closure of CC99-102. Presently hovering over the incumbent, newly installed Grand Jurists of 2000 - 2001.

*Extantly triumphing still, over the law and morality in county, state and federal jurisdictions: via a now presiding (former district attorney) *Superior Court Judge (Danner), the *County Counsel & *Supervisory Board : the Grand Jury's toxified - conflict-of-interest compromised - advisory resources (most recently including the *D.A.'s - Ron Ruiz' - office (obstruction of justice, willful refusal to charge or prosecute proven felonious fugitives - multiple counts of same); since 9/20/ ‘99. For legally binding, overduely unresolved and unacted upon, functionally unavoidable reasons, as listed below. County jurisdictional articles of formal complaint, follow.

I am very sincerely, respectfully and gratefully yours, K.B. Robertson.
Under federal, state and county law, the (former) chief prosecutor is already felonious (sans limitations statutes) in his obligatory and undone duties regarding non prosecution of a capital crime; namely murder in the first degree; of Corine Christensen. With regard to the uncharged star witness in the Bandler-Marino case of 11/ ‘86 - 1/ ‘88. Namely, one James Marino: self confessed - on the witness stand - accessory to the fact in first degree murder (in admitting he concealed the murder weapon; his description of its location then confirmed by Sheriffs divers; from the Capitola pier, 11/ ‘86); as per the court minutes of Mr. Marino's described confession. Refer, Richard Bandler vs. The people. Critically important testimony and witnesses were very deliberately excluded from the main trial by the prosecuting attorney(s). Certainly including the witness-ship testimonies of *Floyd and Harry Creager, the former of whom was *tentatively framed for the murder (the proven effort <intent to frame an innocent person> was aborted before being carried through), without the jury's knowledge. Including the jury's deprivation of many other importantly omitted informations, such as the ‘disappeared’ preliminary trial minutes. Judge Cottle issued illegal jury instructions; as proven in closing trial minutes, 1/ ‘88. Both Mr. Marino and Mr. Bandler were strangely and notably made immune to all drug charges. Whereas, neither man (of the only surviving witnesses) present at the murder scene was legally made immune to murder.

Yet, Mr. Marino proves out to the time of this writing, to be uncharged with the murder he proved himself (in a court of law) accessory to the fact in; as described above. The non prosecution of Mr. Marino is dereliction of duty, obstruction of justice, and accessory after the fact on the part of the *district attorney, Mr. Danner's - since manifestly evident - crucial role as accessory to the fact in deliberately obstructing justice (conspiracy to exclude witnesses, evidence and testimony from the main trial); contrivation to avoid prosecution; criminal negligence.

The deliberate withholding of evidence and testimony from the †main trial in the cited case; by the peculiarly selected, itinerant - out of town; non homicide case experienced - prosecution (Gary Fry. His case closing statement: "We can’t prosecute Mr. Marino. We have no evidence against Mr. Marino. We must have evidence to prosecute." 1/ ‘88, SENTINEL. Gary Fry is since become a federal prosecutor). †As compared with the evidence and witnesses who were called to participate in the preliminary hearing. From which the minutes were mysteriously *disappeared (for years; reappearing in a local judges chambers with equal mystery); *post incidental to the preliminary hearings (June, ‘87) and prior to the main trial (12/ ‘87 - 1/ ‘8. Refer, the (submitted) documentary 16 page *CODE OF SILENCE IN SANTA CRUZ COUNTY (attached above).


Danner is found red handed stealing 30 thousand dollars of county taxpayers money. This information unexpectedly surfaced at an unanticipated civil service hearing (A former Asst. DA.,, Catherine Gardner, publicly contesting her former superior, District Attorney Art Danner III): revealed the theft by Mr. Danner and his efforts to cover it up.

Diving Further Into The Wreck
All this information unexpectedly emerged when former Asst. DA. Catherine Gardner formally contested Mr. Danner's firing of herself... Civil Service hearing revealed furthermore that Mr. Danner compounded his theft by trying to cover it up in counterfeiting false time cards; as though the fired employee were working - serving the county - for the stolen money. (Refer, DANNER'S LIST, attached.)

The Board Of Supervisors did not then; neither does it now have the authority to *authorize the proven theft (via any judgmentally pretentious, extra judicial ‘ratification’). Multifariously, routinely and ambitiously giving increased meaning to the observation that the law is meaningless, if and when it is not enforced: regarding Mr. Danner's proven, multi-felonious, grandly larcenous - under the colors; ex officio mocking actions. The Board Of Supervisors extended ratification (*Resolution # 114-95, 4/-4/ ‘95), having inclusively succeeded only in incriminating its Danner-rescuing innovators (Obstruction of justice. Categorically defined conspiracy - in four out of five supervisorial chairs - to avoid prosecution); as accessories to Mr. Danner's original crime(s): grand larceny; trying to conceal same. Busting the Board Of Supervisors; then effecting the †extirpation of the ( † ‘96 - ‘97) Grand Jury itself: to save himself from justice via misrepresentation of office: aggregate abuse of power. Contiguous factual accessories, justice obstructions and obstructers of justice.

†The Grand Jury received public sector-originated complaints in the wake of all of the above $30,000.00 theft and ratification controversy; shortly thereafter going extinct. Via a precipitous rash of voluntary resignations resulting from internal gridlock about whether or not action should be taken against Danner and/or the Board Of Supervisors (both of which elements constitute the authoritative arms of the Grand Jury. Bearing out monumentally demonstrated *conflict of interest. Further compounding the cited offenses). Resulting in †dissolution of the Santa Cruz county's Grand Jury before it completed its annual term; between 6/ ‘96 and 6/ ‘97. State law requires a sitting Grand Jury in all California counties: at all times.

The state leaves to each county government, how the Grand Jury is predisposed. *The Grand Jury's decreed, contractual authority originates in advise from the Board Of Supervisors and the D.A.'s office, as well as the County Counsel (a select group of county employed lawyers) and the county Superior Court...

A similarly duplicitous Danner-intrigue, involving $808,000.00, recently emerged, 6/21/2000, in the Santa Cruz SENTINEL. Wherein, Mr. Danner asserts that the *Supervisory Board and *County Auditor Knutson knew of the ‘squirreled away’ money. All of the latter, Danner-referenced authorities flatly deny any such knowledge. Refused to give him his usually provided shelters and ad hoc ratifications. On 12 July, 2000 a METRO DeCinzo cartoon aptly described Mr. Danner's earned reputation as 'a well known sleaze bag.' Mr. Danner dares not sue for slander: because the understatement is historically and overwhelmingly the proven truth.

Clandestinely withholding this accumulating state subsidized money, for years. At the expense of single mothers and their children, who were intended to benefit from it. Constitutes solemn derilection of duty and plural criminal contingencies. Lying about Board Of Supervisors and County Auditor alleged knowledge of same constitutes a failed effort to cover up and/or decriminalize the ‘rat-holed money’ and/or criminalize the Supervisory Board and County Auditor. No charges have been brought forth on this so far. The law is meaningless when it is not enforced.

Sincerely,
Kent Benjamin Robertson