Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie Hi Guille, this is an excellent thread starter, as it hits the point I have been recently mulling over in my head. Your point, "Probably you know that the basis of mathematics is logic. But, how exactly does mathematics relate to logic? Is it logic's language, or just a type of use of it?", is exactly what I will try to address. If we truly look at the mind and its possessions, we find the logic processor you mention, and we also find the mathematics processor___why are these ...
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie [/B] The Fallible Human Mind/Ego/Soul of Logic Again Eric, you offer no deffinition of this, otherwise, mythical logic. You know, it seems everyone wants to assume their own perfection and completeness of understanding of ideas, when in fact all ideas and minds are truly incomplete___being itself___is incomplete___yet most speak from an ego as if it possessed complete omega knowledge and wisdom___I think this point quite important. Let's just say that possibly, the mind ...
Originally Posted by dleviwing A Scenario of Absolute Fundamentals for the Creation of the Universe. Let's try to create a new scenario to explain the observed expansion of the universe and maybe some of the other phenomena while we're at it. First let's assume a place has always existed that we can work in and call it the "Void". Cosmos will work just as well. Now we can imagine a fundamental entity we will need to make everything from. Imagine that this substance has a fundamental ...
Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie All I mean Dave is that we do not yet know this, as I have learned through history that logic itself sometimes becomes its own proof, as an example many of the fundamental axioms of mathematics and philosophy. Many are just self-evident proofs. Future logical creations can also possess such character. Though I do admit it's rare today, but it does still happen, i.e., new ways discovered to use math and logic combos, and even entirely new math and logic systems, most likely will be invented. Then ...
Originally Posted by dleviwing NO I DID NOT STATE THAT. Eric; Please stay with the dictionary definitions. Eternal and infinite are not the same. Eternal (adj) without beginning or end. Infinite (adj) having no boundaries or limits (beyond measure) Finite (adj) having bounds: limited: (measurable) The cosmological void: Eternal and infinite Fundamental matter: Eternal and finite Motion of Fundamental Matter: Eternal and finite. The universe: FINITE ...
Recent Comments
Archive
