Sentient marine's Blog

I started looking at gravity about a year ago and have found some strange assumptions.
First the left over heat from the big bang, there are three ways to dissipate that heat.
One over a much longer time scale. Two over a much larger space. But we chose three to have co-expansion of space and expansion through galaxies moving apart.

To explain a co-moving expansion in cooking terms pour oil into a pan. It spreads at a set rate. Wait a bit and pour more in and it expands more quickly by spreading the original oil as it spreads. That sort of damages the big bang as a single event. Of the three alternatives to start the universe we chose the most complex.

Next we know light can be bent a bit by a star, so just how much more could it be bent within a galaxy of hundreds of billions of stars? Ever considered the symmetry of galaxies and especially the part where all the stars at a certain distance from the centre seem to have the same orbit? One could achieve that but the spiral arms would need to be in a tube.

The speed of light, now isn't it curious that it is 'forbidden' to look at the photon experiencing time when it takes eight minutes from the sun to the earth? So in a gravity density situation the difference in the speed would be so slight as to make light appear to have the same speed in all situations. Only when measuring to better than 14 decimal places would one start to see a variation. It means however that the photon then 'experiences time'.

Point to note when gravity probe B was sent out on its mission it came back with one gyro looking forward, one backward and the other two sideways. Within hours the mathematics were invented to explain why a 'wrong' result could be correct. If the mathematics can continue to 'correct' to that degree then it is highly unlikely we will ever look beyond wrong assumptions to find answers.

Now lets look at dimensions starting at zero = a point. We assume 4D reducing to 3D. That is a point to a line, a line to a plane, a plane to a cube and finally a cube to a hyper-cube. That is adding dimensions externally. Try adding dimensions internally. A point to a line, a line to a tube and in fact we can stop right there. General Relativity assumes a single 'strange' dual co-moving expansion from a point to a 4D geometry to reduce down to a 3D balloon for us to exist in. Sure the shape is very simple. It is the first and only simple thing we get from general relativity (hardly good enough for Occam's Razor).

Take the internal expansion a point to a line and equate to a separation of charge. Not matter and anti-matter annihilation but separation. Then expand the line to a tube. The walls of the tube give us the same surface as our 4D balloon. Cross the tubes and you get connections. Now interestingly enough in deep space structure we see only lines otherwise known as filaments of gravity density connecting stars. The appear flat like wound up spirals of spaghetti. Place the most simple smooth shape over that spiral to touch all of the stars and it is a tube.

Gravity has already been assigned a charge state and it is negative. But to have two like charged lines of stars forming a filament of density is unlikely. Is it possible to detect the charge of gravity at a distance, no. So logically these filaments are held by streams of gravity and are opposite in charge. But that makes one line pure anti-matter. Well isn't it interesting that just in this last year we have had a 'collision' of two galaxies producing millions of 'new stars'. In fact that is precisely what you would expect from a matter anti-matter collision, matter is conserved and charge is cancelled. (Do not cross the streams!)

The upshot of this is that a filament of density is a wormhole. Note how even they are and it becomes more apparent that the requirements of energy to a negative energy stable platform do exist in our observable universe. To achieve that and also get effects like false vacuum and the Casimir Effect require that a medium. In this case a density of gravity with many differing flows is needed to support stable worm holes and as a result make possible readings of false vacuum and the presence of the Casimir Effect.

So finally why bother to test this idea? First it allows all the conditions of life to exist as we know it. Second it has some rather unpleasant consequences if we use enough power. Just as one can form a worm hole from a negative energy gradient, one can also form a worm hole if the energy is greater than the overall density of gravity at a given point (like a reverse Casimir Effect). Put simply the hairy quantum fireballs with two trillion degrees temperature are small 10^-23 second worm holes hot at this end due to excess energy.

If the short burst gamma radiation measured in space at about one a day correspond to the production of quantum fireballs we are creating ruptures in space-time and getting the gamma burst back as an indication of the other end of the worm hole. Make the worm hole long enough to connect into an area of space-time that has anti-matter and you have all the making of a stable worm hole. Fail to close it and we become the next connection producing millions of new stars. At least it would be quick.