http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/subversion/ en Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:57:25 GMT vBulletin 60 http://www.toequest.com/forum/images/styles/TotallyPro/misc/rss.jpg http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/subversion/ http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/subversion/44-mesmerizing.html Mon, 08 May 2006 19:49:44 GMT [FONT=Arial][COLOR=#c00000][I][B]we're not the only ones[/B][/I][/COLOR][/FONT]
Sometimes you have got to fight to stay alive
sometime, you just might die for a life
Someone, or maybe even your own one
someone, has got to choose themself as one
come on!
Let's get this party started there's a revolution coming on
and it's coming on strong
let me hear you now
"I'm not the only one"
"You're not the only one!"

[IMG]http://s2.photobucket.com/albums/y9/sect/sacredtriangle.jpg[/IMG] ]]> subversion http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/subversion/44-mesmerizing.html http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/subversion/39-mesmerizing.html Wed, 19 Apr 2006 21:44:41 GMT Hey all you weary travelers! Welcome to my toe quest journal! This is my first update so make sure you leave lots of comments!

I was inspired to update today because I went and talked to my astrophysics teacher, Dr. Lisa young, about my theory and stuff. She told me that I had some "very interesting ideas" and asked me, "what are you going to be doing when you graduate?" I told her that I planned on going on to get my P.h.d., etc.. She seemed very encouraging of this and told me that my thinking was definitely out of the mainstream (she meant this in a good way I believe) and that if I was going to convince mainstream people that I knew what I was talking about then I'd have to have all the mainstream physics down cold. Well, I'm actually pretty well-versed in mainstream physics, but I may be a little rusty when it comes to QM because I've never formally studied it, because I felt that it was wrong in some way and I always thought that it would blind me to the truth. That was befored I discovered the theory of absolute greatest value, so I was naturally cautious. Now that I've discovered the aforementioned theory, perhaps I need to go back and learn about chromodynamics and up quarks and down quakrs and all that stuff so I can set the record straight. I've got the bias on the bias in other words, so I need not fear potentially binding influences. I need to drink deep the pyrian spring, for a little knowledge, is a dangerous thing, they say.

Ok, that having been said, I'd just like to jot down a few of the ideas I've had floating around in my head lately. Mainly, I've been wondering, what would happen if you had an effective lever arm that was less than one planck length long? Would it be the exact opposite of having an infinitely long lever arm? Also, is it possible to simulate an electric current (for the purposes of creating a magnetic field), in the same way that a motion picture simulates motion? If so, can one use this to sort of "experiment with time?" and can you "fool" time so to speek in order to garner "free" energy? Does garnering free energy in turn effect time itself? Hmmmm... I wonder.

'till next time, keep on ruminating ]]> subversion http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/subversion/39-mesmerizing.html