Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics > Branches of Mathematics
Reload this Page Complex Analysis
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old
  (#21 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
11-02-2005, 12:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Matrices is just a mathematical tool of arranging numbers suitable for doing transformations. It does not matter whether the numbers are real or complex. Matrices are used whenever certain transformations are the objects of finding various solutions. Complex analysis is just the applications of the calculus to complex numbers which I believed started by Cauchy.
I lack of calculus knowledge. I can deal with very little of it. When I read "Th road to reality" I believe I will understand calculus. Then I'll be able to start with complex analysis.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
calculus
Old
  (#22 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
calculus - 11-02-2005, 12:31 PM

Calculus deals only with two basic concept 1. derivatives and 2. antiderivatives.
The branch of calculus that deals with derivatives is called differential calculus. The other is integral calculus which deals with antiderivatives.

Derivatives are infinitesimal ratios or slopes of change of the dependent variables and the independent variables.

Antiderivatives are infinitesimal areas of the products between the dependent and independent variables.

Multivariate calculus deals with partial differentiations of partial derivatives and multiple integrals of antiderivatives which include volumes and multidimensional arc lengths, areas and volumes.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#23 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
11-02-2005, 03:43 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Calculus deals only with two basic concept 1. derivatives and 2. antiderivatives.
The branch of calculus that deals with derivatives is called differential calculus. The other is integral calculus which deals with antiderivatives.

Derivatives are infinitesimal ratios or slopes of change of the dependent variables and the independent variables.

Antiderivatives are infinitesimal areas of the products between the dependent and independent variables.

Multivariate calculus deals with partial differentiations of partial derivatives and multiple integrals of antiderivatives which include volumes and multidimensional arc lengths, areas and volumes.
Up to what I know, all antiderivatives are integrals. Or are there antiderivatives which are not integrals?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
fundamental theorem of calculus
Old
  (#24 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
fundamental theorem of calculus - 11-02-2005, 03:55 PM

According to the fundamental theorem of calculus differentiation and integration are inverse operations of each other. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...em_of_calculus


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#25 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
11-02-2005, 05:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
According to the fundamental theorem of calculus differentiation and integration are inverse operations of each other. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundame...em_of_calculus
Yes, I know.

But is there any kind of antiderivative which is not an integral?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
multiplicity
Old
  (#26 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
multiplicity - 11-03-2005, 12:59 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
But is there any kind of antiderivative which is not an integral?
For every integral there is an antiderivative. But for multiple integrals there are multiple antiderivatives.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#27 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
11-03-2005, 02:11 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
For every integral there is an antiderivative. But for multiple integrals there are multiple antiderivatives.
Then, what is the actual difference between antiderivatives and integrals?

Aren't they exactly equal?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#28 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
11-03-2005, 02:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
what is the actual difference between antiderivatives and integrals?
antiderivative is a function. Integral is a sum.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#29 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
11-03-2005, 02:25 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
antiderivative is a function. Integral is a sum.
antiderivative is what kind of function? integral is what kind of sum?

Is there an equation with antidervative in a side, and integral in the other?

I think it would help to see what is the difference.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
probability density function
Old
  (#30 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 184x in 178 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
probability density function - 11-03-2005, 02:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Is there an equation with antidervative in a side, and integral in the other?
Given the antiderivative or probability distribution function F(t), and the probability density function f(t) then F(t)=f(t)dt, which says that F(t) is the integral of f(t) running along differential time dt.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Quantum Mechanics Mohsen Physics Articles 5 07-16-2007 07:04 AM
power bubble vs. complex holo AntonioLao Mathematics 23 03-07-2007 03:22 PM
squared complex modulus AntonioLao Mathematics 17 03-05-2007 12:52 PM
Crossing dimensions by Wessel’s complex plane AntonioLao Your TOE Theory 35 12-05-2005 01:02 PM
never minder AntonioLao Consciousness 31 11-15-2005 06:06 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com