It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics > Branches of Mathematics
Reload this Page key characteristics
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
key characteristics
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
key characteristics - 10-17-2005, 04:07 PM

what are the key characteristics, if any, for the separation of each branch of math?

1. probability (highest level) including discrete and continuous random functions.
2. analyses including real, functional, vector, tensor, fourier, complex, etc.
3. calculus includes differential and integral partial and ordinary equations.
4. analytic geometry includes conic sections linear and nonlinear transformations
5. trigonometry includes plane and spherical.
6. algebra
7. geometry
8. arithmetics (lowest level)


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-18-2005, 02:13 AM

Have 1 (probability) and 3 (calculus) been found any connection? What is it?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
10-18-2005, 11:45 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Have 1 (probability) and 3 (calculus) been found any connection? What is it?
The theory of probability uses all the math under it since it is considered as the highest point of math. In continuous random functions, the integral(s) of the probability density function over the random variable(s) is always equal to unity. One of these continuous functions is the well known Gaussian function or normal function. It is used in IQ assessment and hypothesis testings, etc.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-18-2005, 03:53 PM

How can it be used to test hypotheses?

Can a branch of mathematics be made that is over probability?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
10-18-2005, 04:11 PM

Quote:
How can it be used to test hypotheses?
First, you hypothesize what is the expected value based on your probability density function then perform an experiment. If the value derived from the experiment falls within some standard deviation then it proves that your hypothesis is correct.

All branches of math cover over probability since it only works with numbers between 0 and 1.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-18-2005, 04:23 PM

Oh, yes,

But I meant if there is possibility for a math of higher level than probability to be discovered? If so, how would it be?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
10-19-2005, 11:42 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
if there is possibility for a math of higher level than probability
Personally, I think this would be the mathematics of absolute certainty. However, if everything is certain then why do we need math?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

Last edited by AntonioLao : 10-19-2005 at 12:07 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-19-2005, 04:56 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Personally, I think this would be the mathematics of absolute certainty. However, if everything is certain then why do we need math?
But why should it be absolute certanty at all?

You say that any mathematics level contains all the previous mathematics levels, so, if this is true, then the mathematics of higher level of probability must contain probability, which impplies non absolute certainty, thus, the new math cannot be absolute certainty.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,232
Thanks Given: 692
Thanked 111x in 110 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 73
   
10-20-2005, 12:12 PM

I can give you two replies
1. absolute certainty means that the cumulative probability function is exactly 1. However, if the random variable is time, probability 1 means the end of one's life.
2. All math is invented in order to find a solution to a problem. Absolute certainty means that there is one and only one solution to the problem. When there is one solution, mathematicians call this type of problem linear. However, there are an infinite number of linear problems with different slopes. Solving them can be done by solutions of simultaneous equations. If lines are parallel then no simultaneous solution exists. But for nonlinear problems there are infinite number of solutions to a problem. One can then always select a solution that is applicable to a particular situation.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-12-2005, 09:51 AM

Are there developments done on the relationship between calculus and trigonometry?

That unification would definatelly be good, because it would make a connection between difference, angles, and legths. Pythagoras' theorem could then be studied by calculus. And probably we could find another theorem just as fundamental but more usefull than theoretical euclidean geometry, usefull to physics, in particular.

Also, where are langragians and hamiltonians in the list of math branches?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump