LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksIt is indeed Melanie,very.Originally Posted by melanie
The razor edge between ONe and Off is the remote controlvery subtle.
regards michael.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 11 to 20 of 21
- 02-19-2009 11:11 AM #11Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: The world within and the world without. Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-19-2009 01:14 PM #12Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: The world within and the world without.
It can be expressed as the absolute dynamic equilibrium of the Yin Principle (H-) and the Yang Principle (H+). Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-19-2009 03:59 PM #13Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: The world within and the world without. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
That's a great way to express it,lets tune in and blend
into that double vortex and expand into allness.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-19-2009 05:11 PM #14Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: The world within and the world without.
also expand into wholeness.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-19-2009 05:15 PM #15Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: The world within and the world without. Absolutely I overlooked that one! Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-19-2009 05:21 PM #16Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: The world within and the world without.
How about expansion into spacetime quantum foams?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-19-2009 05:23 PM #17Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: The world within and the world without. That feels unclean somehow? Originally Posted by AntonioLao
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-19-2009 05:33 PM #18Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: The world within and the world without.
But cleanliness is next to godliness or holiness as in the philosophy of holism.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 02-19-2009 05:37 PM #19Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
Re: The world within and the world without. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Well yes you have a point there.
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 02-19-2009 05:43 PM #20Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
Re: The world within and the world without.
I Y I or F Y I, holism asserts that the whole is infinitely greater than the sum of its parts.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 PM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
