[dipayankar]

Interesting. But why does time only flow forward whereas the EM waves can flow forward and back as well??

Originally Posted by timeparticle

I believe that the answer is in the understanding that time is made up of time particles. One time particle can move instantly from one point to another because there is no time lag to slow it down. Time particles attach themselves to each other. Two time particles, attached to each other, moves a little slower than one as a small time lag now exists. Three, a little slower than two, and so on... When ten time particles are attached in a string, or line, light is created. So, ten time particles in a string creates one photon. Because of the unusual shape of a time particle, they could also attach in a stack or in a circle. Ten in a stack create one graviton. Ten in a circle create one particle of electromagnetism. Light, gravity and electromagnetism all move at the same speed as they all have the same number of time particles ..... answering your question.

[dipayankar]

Hi Felix, just two small questions??? Does this ether flow out of our Universe as well??? If it does, are you suggesting parallel universes? Also suppose we discover Gravitron (EM Particle), then where does your theory stand?

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

Hi Dippy

My thoughts relate to the mechanics of my model and need to be viewed in that context. Our 'real' universe is in motion (estimated at about 10,000km/s) in relation to the aether which is static.

This raises a number of other points and a possible solution to the EPR Paradox. Relativity postulates that nothing can travel faster than light and thus the speed of light is the maximum that can be achieved. What this actually means is the no 'real matter' can exceed the speed of light. But gravity is not real matter. This means that, if gravity is accepted as an effect due to the bending of spacetime (aether) then it is not matter and not subject to any limitation. What we experience as a limitation on the movement of light particles has been generally applied but in reality it only applies to matter in the real world. An effect due to a property of the underlying aether (spacetime) would not be subject to such limitations.

The vibration of matter is to do with the way it moves from place to place and the transfer of the information relating to the real particles that are in motion. This information is conducted through the aether by vibration of the graviton strings which are a fixed part of the aether.

regards
Felix

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by dipayankar

Hi Felix, just two small questions???

(1) Does this ether flow out of our Universe as well??? If it does, are you suggesting parallel universes?

(2) Also suppose we discover Gravitron (EM Particle), then where does your theory stand?

Hi Dippy

(1) My version of the aether is a static semi-rigid framework which underlies everything. It is not made of matter as it is the source. The aether does not, therefore, flow or move - it is an absolute frame of reference.
My model contains only one parallel universe - the mirror image of our own consisting of anti-matter.

(2) I would see a 'gravitron' as a machine for making gravity? My theory (http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...nce-shiva.html) has a full explanation of the graviton and its workings.

regards
Felix

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by analog

Time is a product of this absolute motion of the aether, because it merely communicates change. In the initial state, all change was external to the aether as it moved with absolute linear velocity; thus no internal contrast. Time was at its absolute state communicating the vast amount of change taking place in reference to the aether changing its position relative to the external void.

Hi Tim

I see it slightly differently. Imagine the aether as a background like a bed of nails. Each of the nails is a flexible string which is emitted according to a digital clock - these are chronons. Each emitted chronon has a variable length which appears to be random. The presence of a chronon, of sufficient value for the wave function to collapse, is necessary for a matter particle to form.

What I am describing is quantum foam or quintessence which is currently puzzling the science community as they have no explanation for it at present. My proposition is that this - 'the Dance of Shiva' - is the mechanism of time.

regards
Felix

[dipayankar]

So where would the other Universe be? Alongside us? Beside us? Would it interact with us? Possible by gravity? If yes do we share the same gravity source?? Some stupid question for you...

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

Hi Dippy

(1) My version of the aether is a static semi-rigid framework which underlies everything. It is not made of matter as it is the source. The aether does not, therefore, flow or move - it is an absolute frame of reference.
My model contains only one parallel universe - the mirror image of our own consisting of anti-matter.

(2) I would see a 'gravitron' as a machine for making gravity? My theory (http://www.toequest.com/forum/toe-th...nce-shiva.html) has a full explanation of the graviton and its workings.

regards
Felix

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by dipayankar

So where would the other Universe be? Alongside us? Beside us? Would it interact with us? Possible by gravity? If yes do we share the same gravity source?? Some stupid question for you...

Hi Dippy

Not so stupid - just as demanding as your questions always are.

Obviously if we have a parallel AM universe then it can't interact with us as this would bring about annihilation of the interacting matter.

Where would it be - probably somewhere over the rainbow? Suggest you follow the YBR.

It would experience gravity exactly as we do and every action in our world would be mirrored in the other one.

The only possible interaction would involve photons as they are their own anti-particle and hence transferable between the two without mutual destruction. Presumably, this could mean that our parallel universe is visible to us?

regards
Felix

[dipayankar]

Thats exactly where I was coming to Felix. Photons are messanger particles. Probably they havent reached us yet. Also if the nature of forces in the parallel universe is exactly the same as in our universe, then why is that they do not interact with each other gravitationally as well was through EM?

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

Hi Dippy

Not so stupid - just as demanding as your questions always are.

Obviously if we have a parallel AM universe then it can't interact with us as this would bring about annihilation of the interacting matter.

Where would it be - probably somewhere over the rainbow? Suggest you follow the YBR.

It would experience gravity exactly as we do and every action in our world would be mirrored in the other one.

The only possible interaction would involve photons as they are their own anti-particle and hence transferable between the two without mutual destruction. Presumably, this could mean that our parallel universe is visible to us?

regards
Felix

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by dipayankar

Thats exactly where I was coming to Felix. Photons are messanger particles. Probably they havent reached us yet. Also if the nature of forces in the parallel universe is exactly the same as in our universe, then why is that they do not interact with each other gravitationally as well was through EM?

Hi Dippy

Perhaps they have reached us but we have not recognised ourselves in the mirror?

My feeling is that there can be no interaction due to the self destruction of a M/AM meeting. I suppose this is as a similar argument to the anthropomorphic principle - it must be that way otherwise we would not be here? But then again perhaps we're not!

regards
Felix

[dipayankar]

Where do you see gravity in this whole interaction Felix?

Originally Posted by Felix Schrodinger

Hi Dippy

Perhaps they have reached us but we have not recognised ourselves in the mirror?

My feeling is that there can be no interaction due to the self destruction of a M/AM meeting. I suppose this is as a similar argument to the anthropomorphic principle - it must be that way otherwise we would not be here? But then again perhaps we're not!

regards
Felix

[Felix Schrodinger]

Originally Posted by dipayankar

Where do you see gravity in this whole interaction Felix?

Hi Dippy

Gravity is an effect caused by the bending of space due to the prrrrrrresence (sorry that happens when we cats get happy) of matter/mass. If it affects us then it would have an identical effect in a mirrored universe but would have no interaction between them.

regards
Felix