Welcome to the ToeQuest.

View Poll Results: Will you be chatting with us?

Voters
13. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes - I'll be there for sure!

    4 30.77%
  • Probably - I might have a conflict, but I'll try to be there.

    4 30.77%
  • Maybe - I've already made other plans, but I'll try to sneak off and find a computer.

    4 30.77%
  • No Way - Not interested. Maybe another time.

    1 7.69%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,090
    Blog Entries
    130
    Thanks Given
    1,678
    Thanked 861x in 483 Posts
    Rep Power
    43

    Awards Showcase

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Since 1916, Einstein's renowned 'elevator analogy' endures as a standard for instruction, regarding the Principle of Equivalence and the General Theory of Relativity.

    It originated as a (completely tractable) 'thought experiment'.
    (George Berkeley, 1710) ... lay the beginning in a distinct explication of what is meant by thing, reality, existence: for in vain shall we dispute concerning the real existence of things, or pretend to any knowledge thereof, so long as we have not fixed the meaning of those words.

    "All things come out of the one and the one out of all things." - Heraclitus
    "Reality is an illusion - albeit a persistent one." - Einstein
    "Particles give me a headache." - Ibid

  2. #12
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    5
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Quote Originally Posted by basil View Post
    To Girdharilal,

    Any attempt at a TOE must include thought... unless you regard your thoughts as unreal & insignificant. How can anyone even contemplate a TOE without thought?

    Thanks

    Basil
    hi basil thanks,i wish i knew.i must have missed something about magnetism related to dna or some protines,are you refering to some mri study

  3. #13
    JAK
    JAK is offline
    1st degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    251
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thanks Given
    10
    Thanked 38x in 16 Posts
    Rep Power
    31

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Quote Originally Posted by basil View Post
    Well bugger me... I've joined in for the first tme & realised that any possible interested parties are offline!? Do I smell or sumat?... Is it me or the topic? I was hoping for a great Saturday night debate! Thought is what makes us who we are? Every species 'thinks' to a certain degree & anthropologists argue that language differentiates humans from animals?... But I don't believe that there is a definitive point?... Species evolve according to their physical & environmental possibilities? Genes & memories contain & maitain all the 'good stuff' & reject or appoint all the crap... so we are on a gradual journey of improvement & enlightenment. Why is it that the scientists don't see that?
    Hallelujah, Brother! You're singing beautiful music to me! Let the rest of these guys play with their quarks, but let's go start a thread for serious investigation of thought. Have you read any of these: "Quest for Consciousness" (C. Koch), "The Feeling of What Happens" (A. Damasio), or any Global Workspace stuff by Bernard Baars - especially "Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness"?
    Emotive Energy - JAK's Theory of Brain, Mind, & Emotion:
    http://www.theoryofmind.org/

    The Origin of Minds - Peggy LaCerra & Roger Bingham
    http://www.atonewiththeuniverse.org/

    Behavioral Investment Theory - Gregg's Theory of Brain, Mind, & Emotion:
    http://psychweb.cisat.jmu.edu/ToKSys...iles/frame.htm

  4. #14
    White Belt
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    India
    Posts
    5
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Quote Originally Posted by JAK View Post
    Hallelujah, Brother! You're singing beautiful music to me! Let the rest of these guys play with their quarks, but let's go start a thread for serious investigation of thought. Have you read any of these: "Quest for Consciousness" (C. Koch), "The Feeling of What Happens" (A. Damasio), or any Global Workspace stuff by Bernard Baars - especially "Essential Sources in the Scientific Study of Consciousness"?
    Thanks,I will first read the stuff and then comeback

  5. #15
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,130
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 149x in 103 Posts
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Thought would primarily be a feature of the living thing. However the ToE would in reality take the physical world into consideration (that which can be defined by physics).

    Quote Originally Posted by basil View Post
    To Girdharilal,

    Any attempt at a TOE must include thought... unless you regard your thoughts as unreal & insignificant. How can anyone even contemplate a TOE without thought?

    Thanks

    Basil

  6. #16
    Master
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    759
    Blog Entries
    9
    Thanks Given
    14
    Thanked 209x in 170 Posts
    Rep Power
    18

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Most scientists look for reality in mathematics and fail to realize that motion generates mathematics. It is important to use both -- but look for physical movement to supply the math to fully understand nature. Thinking outside the box is a good way to direct science.

  7. #17
    Grandmaster
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    India
    Posts
    2,130
    Blog Entries
    2
    Thanks Given
    27
    Thanked 149x in 103 Posts
    Rep Power
    51

    Re: 2008-05-03: Thought Experiments

    Thats right. Most of the times, scientists allow mathematics to limit the realm of physics. Like what happened prior to the Big Bang. Since mathematics cannot move beyond infinity, it is assumed even physics would be limited at this level
    Quote Originally Posted by spacedout View Post
    Most scientists look for reality in mathematics and fail to realize that motion generates mathematics. It is important to use both -- but look for physical movement to supply the math to fully understand nature. Thinking outside the box is a good way to direct science.

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top