2005-10-01: Warps in SpaceTime

[Guille]

It was a good chat.

Dave, dipanjankar (spelling?) and I were there for around an hour and a half. We Started by discussing what the singularity point actually is, if it's zero-dimensonal or not, if it's energy, matter, if it's space, if it's time....

Then we started to derive the discusion, because to clarify the singularity we needed first to clarify more basic themes, so we went into questions such as:
Is space-time quantized or continouse?
Is matter really quantized? If so, how can it's particles be 0-dimensional?
Are mass and energy waves?

And other questions. I noticed some things in my own theories, that I hadn't ntoiced before. Then we started to come back into the black holes, centering on what there is after the singularity. We discussed paraleln universes, in the sense of qualitative difference and quantitative difference.

Robert was there at the begining, but after a bit he went, and during irregular periods of time came back in and out.

[dleviwing]

Guille;
I don't recall discussion of quantification but I would like to express my view (opinion) of it.

There is a unique quantity of motion needed in order to allow a quantity of matter to become autonomous within its universal environment. Any physical system will maintain this quantity regardless of interactions. When this quantity is accumulated by the most finite quantity of matter capable of sustaining this motion quantity, we have the fundamental quantum units of matter, energy, mass, and force.
Antonio uses them in his theory; They are the "Planck Constants".

[Guille]

Guille;
I don't recall discussion of quantification but I would like to express my view (opinion) of it.

There is a unique quantity of motion needed in order to allow a quantity of matter to become autonomous within its universal environment. Any physical system will maintain this quantity regardless of interactions. When this quantity is accumulated by the most finite quantity of matter capable of sustaining this motion quantity, we have the fundamental quantum units of matter, energy, mass, and force.
Antonio uses them in his theory; They are the "Planck Constants".

I agree with all exept for mass.

What planck constant is to do with mass qaunta? What is this mass qaunta? Do you meant he higgs? If so, I they were there mcuha fter plack, around half century later. Also, I've never read anything Antonio said about the qaunta of mass.

[dleviwing]

Guille;
I prefer to do the simple conversion using Einstein's equation and Planck's constant "h" for energy and call that the mass quanta rather than calling it relative mass of a photon. The actual equation for Planck's mass uses the gravitational constant "G" to scale the results. I don't feel this is a true universal quantum representation of mass.
The Higgs boson is just another quantum measure of subatomic energy .

You already know I do not view mass as a true value for defining the quantity of matter.