Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    quibbling empty boxes

    Global Circulation Models (GCMs) are 3D computer simulation programs predicting future climate changes. These include jet streams, deep ocean currents, solar reflectance off ice sheets and glaciers, vegetation dynamics, cloud movements, and many other climate related factors. The programs work from first principles of thermodynamics, fluid mechanics, carbon cycle, water cycle, etc. Based on the mathematics of finite element analysis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Finite_element_analysis, the elements are 3D grid boxes covering a given contiguous quantized cubic unit of air. Land, and sea and the models step forward in time by 20 minutes or an hour increments, again and again for one complete cycle of the four seasons: spring, summer, fall, and winter. The idealized models are so big and complex that they can only be executed in supercomputers owned by mega-rich organizations: NASA, NCAR, NOAA, and Britain’s Hadley Center.

    However, if these programs were to run backward in time by stepping 20 minutes or an hour into the past then they failed to match data of climate conditions that have already happened. The grid boxes would be found empty since negative time increments are not allowed in irreversible entropic nonlinear differential equations. Moreover, these equations could not possibly simulate chaotic and stochastic dynamic processes. These are then analogous to guessing the content of lunch boxes of school children before they open them during lunch recess.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: quibbling empty boxes

    educated guesswork seems to be in full vogue these days!




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: quibbling empty boxes

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    educated guesswork
    Good observation. But how often can these guesses be found empty of informative content?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: quibbling empty boxes

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Good observation. But how often can these guesses be found empty of informative content?

    I would guess more often than realised.



    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold AntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,265
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,083
    Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
    Rep Power
    152

    Re: quibbling empty boxes

    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    I would guess more often than realised.
    Is this objective reality or subjective reality? Is the quantum vacuum of space-time objectively real or subjectively real?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of mkirkpatrick has much to be proud of
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,259
    Blog Entries
    4
    Thanks Given
    285
    Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
    Rep Power
    149

    Smile Re: quibbling empty boxes

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Is this objective reality or subjective reality? Is the quantum vacuum of space-time objectively real or subjectively real?
    Niether my friend,both are illusions.




    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?


 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top