Is this the same as a supernatural being? The Gospel of Judas Iscariot seems to imply that the "True Being" is unknowable and undescribable.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Is this the same as a supernatural being? The Gospel of Judas Iscariot seems to imply that the "True Being" is unknowable and undescribable.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
physical knowledge is not an attribute of the "true being" If it is then it becomes a sequence of Russian dolls one within one within one ad infinitetum.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
One infinity or one zero? I know infinity is not a number but zero is a whole number with that unique property of separating or dividing the real numbers line into the positive and the negative integers.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Physically speaking, it has no mass, no weight, no volume, no density, no, energy, no electric charge, no color charge, no parity, no spin, no strangeness, etc.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Then that would be something to think about.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)