| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
12-04-2007, 03:39 PM
| | Re: fool stool tool
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick "true being" | Is this the same as a supernatural being? The Gospel of Judas Iscariot seems to imply that the "True Being" is unknowable and undescribable.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
12-04-2007, 03:45 PM
|  Re: fool stool tool
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao  Is this the same as a supernatural being? The Gospel of Judas Iscariot seems to imply that the "True Being" is unknowable and undescribable. | Undescribable yes,unknowable no!It is about realization and understanding,acceptence
is the key that unlocks the sequence!
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
12-04-2007, 03:56 PM
| | Re: fool stool tool
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick unknowable no! | physical knowledge is not an attribute of the "true being" If it is then it becomes a sequence of Russian dolls one within one within one ad infinitetum.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
12-04-2007, 04:03 PM
| Re: fool stool tool
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao physical knowledge is not an attribute of the "true being" If it is then it becomes a sequence of Russian dolls one within one within one ad infinitetum. | Not physical knowledge,universal realization of true being,and yes,when fully understood,
the many vanish,leaving just the "appearance" of ONE!
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
12-04-2007, 04:09 PM
| | Re: fool stool tool
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick leaving just the "appearance" of ONE! | One infinity or one zero? I know infinity is not a number but zero is a whole number with that unique property of separating or dividing the real numbers line into the positive and the negative integers.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
12-04-2007, 04:12 PM
| Re: fool stool tool
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao One infinity or one zero? I know infinity is not a number but zero is a whole number with that unique property of separating or dividing the real numbers line into the positive and the negative integers. | One zero,would be my reply.
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
12-04-2007, 04:18 PM
| | Re: fool stool tool
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick One zero,would be my reply. | Physically speaking, it has no mass, no weight, no volume, no density, no, energy, no electric charge, no color charge, no parity, no spin, no strangeness, etc.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
12-04-2007, 04:24 PM
| Re: fool stool tool
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Physically speaking, it has no mass, no weight, no volume, no density, no, energy, no electric charge, no color charge, no parity, no spin, no strangeness, etc. | It has everything,yet also no-thing!
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
12-17-2007, 04:43 PM
| | Re: fool stool tool
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick It has everything,yet also no-thing! | Then that would be something to think about.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
12-17-2007, 06:12 PM
| Re: fool stool tool
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Then that would be something to think about. | Absolutely my friend,it is both all and no-thing,it IS and yet IS not?
regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:55 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
