4 no 3-2-1 yes

[AntonioLao]

There are over 100 chemical elements (artificial or natural) discovered so far. Most compounds are bonded by sharing electron pairs called covalence bonding. One of the unsolved mysteries of chemistry is why quadruple bonds do not occur naturally or even artificially. Is it because it violates the octet rule of electron numbers in the outermost shells of chemical elements? The element carbon has 4 valence electrons. By the octet rule it needed four more to complete its outer orbitals. However, two carbon atoms could never share 4 pairs of valence electron even though they can share 3 or 2 or 1 valence electrons called respectively as the triple bond, double bond, and the single bond.

On the other hand, if bond lengths are analyzed with a principle of proximity. It can be shown that the 4-bond structure would need the overlap of nuclear wavefunctions of both carbon atoms. This implies that even wavefunctions cannot possibly violate the proximity theorem of all natural structure. The atomic radius of the neutral carbon atom is 77 picometers while the ionic radius of carbon ion is only 15 picometers. There is a difference of 62 picometers for which the overlapping wavefunctions can take place where the electromagnetic force must overcome the strong nuclear force. This is even worst if the neutral atomic radius of hydrogen (37 picometers) is taken into consideration. Alternatively, a quadruple covalent bond would also break the perfect symmetry of volume determinant from its relation to the scalar triple product: A´B×C where A, B, and C are 3 dimensional vectors.

[mkirkpatrick]

There are over 100 chemical elements (artificial or natural) discovered so far. Most compounds are bonded by sharing electron pairs called covalence bonding. One of the unsolved mysteries of chemistry is why quadruple bonds do not occur naturally or even artificially. Is it because it violates the octet rule of electron numbers in the outermost shells of chemical elements? The element carbon has 4 valence electrons. By the octet rule it needed four more to complete its outer orbitals. However, two carbon atoms could never share 4 pairs of valence electron even though they can share 3 or 2 or 1 valence electrons called respectively as the triple bond, double bond, and the single bond.

On the other hand, if bond lengths are analyzed with a principle of proximity. It can be shown that the 4-bond structure would need the overlap of nuclear wavefunctions of both carbon atoms. This implies that even wavefunctions cannot possibly violate the proximity theorem of all natural structure. The atomic radius of the neutral carbon atom is 77 picometers while the ionic radius of carbon ion is only 15 picometers. There is a difference of 62 picometers for which the overlapping wavefunctions can take place where the electromagnetic force must overcome the strong nuclear force. This is even worst if the neutral atomic radius of hydrogen (37 picometers) is taken into consideration. Alternatively, a quadruple covalent bond would also break the perfect symmetry of volume determinant from its relation to the scalar triple product: A´B×C where A, B, and C are 3 dimensional vectors.

When we get to Z are we then on fusions highway?


regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

When we get to Z are we then on fusions highway

Actually, back to A on Moebius highway.

[mkirkpatrick]

Actually, back to A on Moebius highway.

Yes we are getting tangible within the intangible?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

getting tangible within the intangible

Matter can only exist through the 8-fold way as in the octet rule of quantum mechanics and Eastern Mystecism and that of absolute acceleration in Hadamard matrices. Anything more or less is just vacuum of energy squared.

[mkirkpatrick]

Matter can only exist through the 8-fold way as in the octet rule of quantum mechanics and Eastern Mystecism and that of absolute acceleration in Hadamard matrices. Anything more or less is just vacuum of energy squared.

Then what is the (matter) in consciousness?



regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

Then what is the (matter) in consciousness

The matter that we know of is derived from the 8th root of consciousness while its 4th root is negative or antimatter.

[mkirkpatrick]

The matter that we know of is derived from the 8th root of consciousness while its 4th root is negative or antimatter.

Thank you Antonio,I never knew that!The higher the number the purer the consciousness?




regards michael.

[AntonioLao]

I never knew that

Just discovered it this morning in the bus on the way here at the public library. But I can only prove by using complex imaginary numbers.

[mkirkpatrick]

Just discovered it this morning in the bus on the way here at the public library. But I can only prove by using complex imaginary numbers.

I was on the bus earler today,however all that happened to me was to be accosted for
money to buy beer!




regards mchael.