[Guille]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Michael; If you accelerate your thoughts to the speed of light then maybe they will have mass and show signs of weight. Just a thought; Dave

Imagening the thoughts have mass at all. Thoughts are electric charges, thus, they move at the speed of electrciity in organic matter. How can you accelerate them?

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Try taking your tea Chinese style very black, without cream or sugar?

I had the idea, but it weighted so little compared to those of my theories and other theories, that it was gravitationally atracted by them, they are sort of black holes. They "ate" the thought of gaving tea chinese style, and it dessapeared into another universe, with the coincidence that this was your mind, it game from a whitehole, which are places with lack of ideas, so you have lack of ideas?

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by <<>> Imagening the thoughts have mass at all. Thoughts are electric charges, thus, they move at the speed of electrciity in organic matter. How can you accelerate them?

Maybe by doing some quick-thinking?








kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Maybe by doing some quick-thinking?

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Think further what your theory means.

Thinking quicker doesn't refer to the speed of thought, but to the speed of thoughts. Particularlly, how many thoughts are done in a sample of time, not how fast the move. When I'm developing my math investigation on permutations, transformations and matrices, in class, I tihnking much faster than I do in history. Is it because I am making my electrons faster? NO. It is because I'm using a part of the brain that develops more thought sin les time, principally due to the fact that mathematics has correlations between most of it's parts. Whiles history, no matter what confucio or miachiaveli said about event sbeing repetitive, has each specific period of time different to the others. So we think more slowlly, but develop big correlations aswell.

[dleviwing]

Guille;
You shouldn't respond seriously to Michael's British humor nor mine.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by dleviwing Guille; You shouldn't respond seriously to Michael's British humor nor mine.

As I could check in Oxford, british humor is the less humorious thing of brits.

Probably because they are used to think slow: I mean, english peopel always take a cup of tea to make any decision, they probably even take a cup of tea to decide upon wheather ahving a cup of tea to solve a conflict. This is an infinite paradox. Anyway, as they analise stiautions so much, the situations chang ebfore they can do anything. While spaniards don't even wonder about how to spell analise correctly, they act, and the think (some of them forget doing the second part). Bad for a state, or society, good for jokes.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE so you have lack of ideas?

If ideas doubled every second, I still can't understand whether second before my mind was half empty of ideas or half full of ideas.

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao If ideas doubled every second, I still can't understand whether second before my mind was half empty of ideas or half full of ideas.

As I believe this question is one of philosophy of life, I will give you the four different answers you would get from it:
1. Moderate positivist: it's half full!
2. Moderate negativist: it's gal empty.
3. Extreme positivist: it's totally full-empty!!!
4. Extreme negativist: it's not full or empty...

I enter in none of the above life philosophies, why? Because I'm more of a spanish, a latin, an artist-like person, that is, I am one moment one the other moment another. The difference between spanish, latins or artists and me is that my form of being doesn't depend on my feelings but on my thoughts. If I develop a negative thought, I'm negativist, whiles artists or latins if they have a negative feeling, they are negativists.

[AntonioLao]

Originally Posted by GUILLE If I develop a negative thought, I'm negativist

Is this the same as what is said about being pessimistic in contradistinction to being optimistic?

[Guille]

Originally Posted by AntonioLao Is this the same as what is said about being pessimistic in contradistinction to being optimistic?

Yes. I say negativist or negavitism because I find it more technical, scientific, ina way. Pessimism is a more wide way, it refers to any negative behaviour thought or expression, including laziness, not carrying about and others. Negativism is more of a philsophical kind, out of the pessimists, those who can be called negativists are those that have to pessimism of life in a rational thinking process, philosophyzing. But this is my definition of the word, not the proper one (if it at all exist).