The physical implication is to prolong life to the point of being everlasting.Originally Posted by GUILLE
The physical implication is to prolong life to the point of being everlasting.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Both destruction and construction?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
destruction for ones at the bottom of the foodchain and construction for ones at the top of the foodchain unless it has been proven that vegetarians live longer.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Actually they odn't, I think it's exactly the opposite: it's been proven that being a vegeterian doesn't satisfy all the cellular and organistic neccesities. So your theory is true.Originally Posted by AntonioLao
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)