LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksWe are always looking backward in time throught the channels of our memory lanes. When we observe the nightsky of stars or looking through the most powerful optical telescopes or listening with the most sensitive radio telescopes, we are merely looking and listening the past.
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 17
Thread: always looking in
- 11-05-2005 04:55 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
always looking in
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-05-2005 05:36 PM #2The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 62
That's because distance makes things have to take time to move.
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 11-05-2005 07:18 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
backward
That is correct. But the motion is into the past not into the future. Originally Posted by GUILLE Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-05-2005 07:37 PM #4Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
The motion is into the ever present Now. The motion is neither,it moves in the eternal now,the past is Originally Posted by AntonioLao
now forgotten,the future is now re-membering..Past and present are only
realitive terms,and have no meaning in the eternal now!
kind regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-05-2005 07:47 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
distant past?
Do you mean the distant, distant past? I still can have vivid recollections of things that I did 50 years ago. The motion is that of the mind thru the eyes. Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-05-2005 07:53 PM #6Moderator
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- United Kingdom
- Posts
- 11,259
- Blog Entries
- 4
- Thanks Given
- 285
- Thanked 839x in 676 Posts
- Rep Power
- 149
you were more alive before you were Born? yes,the motions that occured prior to this present Originally Posted by AntonioLao
incarnation!
regards michael.Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
- 11-06-2005 06:05 AM #7The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 62
If this is supposed to be a philosophical discussion there is no space for mythological or theological explenations or theories.
If we want to discuss when/how/why/what is alive and exists, we must determine what existing and living are first.
- 11-06-2005 03:38 PM #8Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
edge of the universe
We exist exactly at the edge of the universe and looking in to see how it all began but somehow we cannot look out to see what the future holds. Originally Posted by GUILLE Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
- 11-06-2005 03:49 PM #9The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 62
Correction: We are at the end of OUR universe. Not of THE universe. That small difference leads to totally opposite views about the universe. We cannot see what is the future of OUR universe in that we don't know how our understanding of the universe will be in the future. But, don't we? But scientists and philosophers definatelly do, that is the principle of wisdom and knowledge: to predict and understand. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 11-06-2005 04:40 PM #10Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,265
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,083
- Thanked 1,411x in 1,137 Posts
- Rep Power
- 152
outlive
It would be so much better to outlive one's prediction and understanding by extending our lives 1000-fold. Originally Posted by GUILLE Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:09 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
