| | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 | To michael and antonio -
11-06-2005, 05:26 AM
But the mind doesn't have female and male aspects. It just happens that the female mind is ussually and avaragelly of kind F. And the male mind is ussually and avaragelly of kind M. But minds M and minds F are not purelly M or F, they have aspects, qualities, properties and characteristics of the opposite one. | |
|  | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 | both qualities -
11-06-2005, 02:46 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE they have aspects, qualities, properties and characteristics of the opposite one. | Does the implication exists that there can't be a perfect man or a perfect woman? However, that procreation of a human being is an exclusive woman's attribute?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 | I'll answer, but first.... -
11-06-2005, 02:58 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Does the implication exists that there can't be a perfect man or a perfect woman? However, that procreation of a human being is an exclusive woman's attribute? | Is the first question supposed to have connection with the second one? | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 |
11-06-2005, 03:42 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE Is the first question supposed to have connection with the second one? | Physically speaking, the questions are connected. Mentally speaking, they are not.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-06-2005, 03:48 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao Physically speaking, the questions are connected. Mentally speaking, they are not. | Well, in my opinion, yes, there is no possibility of any human to be perfect. And yes, the female is the only gender of animals that can give to birth. But, if evolution, or mutation, or artificial biological modifications occur, then males might happen to be able to give birth. Or maybe females loose the ability to give to birth, and the males gain it. Or maybe nobody has it, and we all die. In any case, if I get to choose, definatelly I don't want to give to birth. | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 |
11-06-2005, 04:05 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE I don't want to give to birth. | According to certain religious belief, giving birth is a God's given punishment for disobedience.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-06-2005, 04:21 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao According to certain religious belief, giving birth is a God's given punishment for disobedience. | Well I have no ethics or no believe in god. So I guess I would be condemed in hell to give birth to myself for the time of time.... | |
| | | | | | Raider of the lost time
Status: Offline Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003 Rep Power: 80 |
11-06-2005, 04:41 PM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE give birth to myself for the time of time.... | In the same religious belief. There is one and only one 'virgin birth' and in Chinese religious mythology, there is the stone monkey whose mother was the entire universe itself. In some religious groups in India, they associate the stone monkey as the Hanuman. In Japan, monkeys are considered spiritual possessing souls.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| |
| | | | | | Moderator
Status: Offline Posts: 7,477
Thanks Given: 369
Thanked 792x in 728 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005 Rep Power: 98 |  positive and negitive unite off-earth. -
11-14-2005, 07:18 PM
In the ancient wisdom,it teaches that when off-earth or out of incarnation we
are combined and united,both male and female combined,both aspects together
within the soul.When the choice to incarnate arises,then as the decent into
dence physical matter commences,the one becomes de-tached and whatever
the chosen sex was,will then incarnate,the other may also incarnate,or choose
to stay and observe!
kind regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | |
| | | | | | The Thinker
Status: Offline Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005 Rep Power: 48 |
11-15-2005, 03:00 AM
Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao In the same religious belief. There is one and only one 'virgin birth' and in Chinese religious mythology, there is the stone monkey whose mother was the entire universe itself. In some religious groups in India, they associate the stone monkey as the Hanuman. In Japan, monkeys are considered spiritual possessing souls. | In gibraltar, which is near to where I lived since I was 2 up to when I was 12, monkeys have priority over anything else. If you are in a car, you must stop, if they are crossing, if you run over them you can get in serious legal problems, even if it wasn't in purpose. In the streets you can make photos and get near, but you shouldn't do anything to them, for they will get really angry. One of the reasons for all of this is that their a tradition there, it's their sing, just like bulls are for Spain. And another reason is that historiographers, histobiologists and other scientific disciplines still don't know how the monkeys went from morroco to Spain, apparently, when spain was join to africa, it was still to early for them to be so north, they hadn't arrived yet. It's a mistery. Anyway, I meant this because also in western society monkeys are special.
And also we see monkeys and other similars to it to be our brothers or cousins. But trecent discoveries on cell biology have shown that our cell structure is nothing like theirs. We look more like pigs. | |
| | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |
