Is it possible to talk about the gender of the mind? Biologically speaking, there is such a thing as masculine and feminine brain. But can there be masculine and feminine mind?
Is it possible to talk about the gender of the mind? Biologically speaking, there is such a thing as masculine and feminine brain. But can there be masculine and feminine mind?
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
YES!Originally Posted by AntonioLao
A friend of mine who is the kind of people that is always looking for curious thing sin which to waste time, money, and effort (notice I wrote AND and not OR), once showed me a webpage where you could make a test to detemrine how masculine/femenin your mind/brain is, I have forgotten it, I will ask him for it. But it was very interesting. I didn't do the test myself, I didn't have time then, and forgot about it all. But he did. And out of a 100 points, 0-50 femenin and 50-100 masculine, my friend got 55, so, quite little masculin. The avarage man is 75, and the avarage wemen is 25. So yes, if you were asking yoursel fwheather the bilogical sex has to do with the mental one, they do. But this is logical, for life and mind are two parallel concepts. Although there can be wemen with a masculine mind (50+) and men with a femenin mind (50-). Not like in biological sexuality.
That would then invalidate the existence of one supermind but two.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Do you mean that it would invalidate the existence of one supermind, but proof or support the existence of two superminds?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
A masculine supermind and a feminine supermind but they are not equally powerful. One is slightly more powerful.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Humm......strange. You mean that when each of us is born s/he has two minds, a femenin and a masculin, but one is slightly bigger than the other?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
If so, what determines one of them to be bigger than the other?
We live our lives by choosing which is the one until the day we die. Some chooses immediately, some chooses much later, some chooses at the time they die. Just like choosing between being good or bad. So, we die one way or the other with only one choice of mind.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There is a slight difference: minds exist, and so do lifes, but ethics, as it is described by the grand mayority of people, doesn't.Originally Posted by AntonioLao
But, don't you think that all our life isn't chosen by us. We don't choose our parents, our school, our body, our mind. We choose nothing that happens to us.
Actually, this debate is the major debate between the two mayor philosophies of life: the positivst and the negativist. Both are gravitational, but I magnetically repel them both.
I chose to live on the 3rd planet that surround the binary stars system found in the constellation of Orion but gravity prevents me from doing so. However, my mind is already there.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
When did you take such an election, before or in life? (supposing you are not already dead, in which case the election you might ahve maid after life).Originally Posted by AntonioLao
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)