| |
 | |
 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 7,749
| |
11-06-2005, 12:23 PM
|  arising simultaniously is that motion?
Quote: |
Originally Posted by <<>> Thoughts are instantanous if and only if thoughts don't move through a distance, thus, they don't move. Thus, they don't have speed, not even instantanous. | What then would you call simultanious arisings
in mind,perfect symetry,unified-cognision,or what wouldyou call the answering
of a question before you have fully formed it in your mind??pre-cognision!
kind regards michael.
__________________
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself? | | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48  | |
11-06-2005, 12:36 PM
| | Co-
Quote: |
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick What then would you call simultanious arisings
in mind,perfect symetry,unified-cognision,or what wouldyou call the answering
of a question before you have fully formed it in your mind??pre-cognision!
kind regards michael. | INCIDENCE. | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
11-06-2005, 03:54 PM
| | electric and magnetic
The mind is magnetic. On the other hand the brain is electric. The speed of the brain is limited while the speed of the mind is unlimited. Unlimited because no one has ever determined the speed of magnetic field.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 04:00 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The mind is magnetic. On the other hand the brain is electric. The speed of the brain is limited while the speed of the mind is unlimited. Unlimited because no one has ever determined the speed of magnetic field. | But that doesn't impply that it is infinite. The problem is that most people seem to think that if sometihng has no limit, then it is infinite. But it is not like that.
I also believe that the mind is magnetic. But how can we prove this? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
11-06-2005, 04:47 PM
| | proofs
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE But how can we prove this? | By a negative proof: The failure to detect the magnetic monopole. They are not material like electron or proton.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 04:49 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao By a negative proof: The failure to detect the magnetic monopole. They are not material like electron or proton. | Exactly, their are quanta, not particles. Just like photons or gravitons, in my opinion. | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
11-06-2005, 05:09 PM
| | directional property
Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE Just like photons or gravitons | They are quanta of spacetime. All things have them but they cannot be separated into positive (up or right or forward in time) and negative (down or left or backward in time) magnetic helicity.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
11-06-2005, 05:23 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao They are quanta of spacetime. All things have them but they cannot be separated into positive (up or right or forward in time) and negative (down or left or backward in time) magnetic helicity. | What about magnetic monopoles?
Interesting, with this we would come to Teilhard de Chardin's and mkirpatrik's theories that all matter, not only intelectual organic one, is consciouss of itself. | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
11-06-2005, 05:46 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE What about magnetic monopoles? | Magnetic monopoles, gravitons, Higgs bosons are all classifiable as the quanta of spacetime.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Orange Belt
Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 27
12 | |
11-06-2005, 09:36 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao The mind is magnetic. | is there proof for this? even if we can make deductions how does it single out a magnetic field. is it not possible to be something we cannot comprehend. | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
