The problem is the origin of life and its brief existence in the universal time scale.Originally Posted by melanie
The problem is the origin of life and its brief existence in the universal time scale.Originally Posted by melanie
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
I surmise this statement just proved the existence of absolute consciousness.Originally Posted by melanie
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Intuitive proof happens without evidence. Deductive proof needs a generalization statement while inductive proof needs a particular statement that is true repeatedly.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Deduction is a branch of mathematics called geometry while induction is a branch of mathematics called algebra. Now people are often get mixed up between the two discipline and came up a branch of mathematics called analytic geometry and from that came the calculus and then analysis and then probability.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Just the opposite I find learning a language the hardest. IYI, I am still learning and discovering new facts about my own created math (called Hadamard matrices) as applied to spacetime quantization.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)