[krateesh]

Big Bangs - A theory or a misconception


I read and drowned in my ideas after reading the recent theory given by Neil Turok.I thought, what shortcomings it has or it will pose better answers for today's mysteries and thus I got to a conclusion after 7 days of research .How it can effect these objects and phenomenon.

Acc. to this concept ,several big bangs ,I will call it MBB happened in the universe, but they can't happen simultaneously ,some of them might might have banged after and before 13.7 bill. limit,thus Mean time of explosions can be taken as 13.7 bill.yrs.


Expansion rate-
A plump solitary big bang can cause everlasting expansion that the MBB can't do. Since matter in universe in both the concepts is the same therefore we can say MBB might not have produced much expansion rate many expansions of different big bangs might have collided with one another further deteriorating acceleration.



Gamma Ray Bursts-
Now one big bang have much larger space for expansion in comparison with little ones .Now GRB's are known to be caused by primordial black holes i.e. Hypernovae in primordial nebulae. Now the question rises that which of these theories favour the existence of GRB's.
Now a solitary one have more mass ,more matter ,more speed thus you can't get superdense nebulae in one sight .But MBB accounts for less mass ,less speed and there it poses a possibility of such supermassive bodies.


Supermassive objects-
Clumps of hundred of galaxies formed by gravitational pull and collisions between objects of different big bangs will further deteriorate the a much slower expansion rate.It can might also solve the mystery of bodies like Quasars giving it a totally new concept. Quite different from conventional ideas and I think this case is having a very little probability.


Shape of Galaxies-
Abundance of elliptical and spiral galaxies shows that these beautiful creations can't be made by random explosions.Moreover forces of Dark matter will also play a major role (later explained).Collisions will be rapid thus having a proper shape is of less probablity than being disintegrated into smaller pieces or forming larger clumps of irregular shape.

Size of Galaxies-

Size of galaxies can also pose to be strong favourer as MBB should have a large number of supermassive bodies (explained above).As the forces of decceleration,gravitation and rapid collisions will deteriorate expansion and help the clumps to form into big galaxies ,but you decide whether our universe is having abundancy of big galaxies or small galaxies.


Shape of the Universe-
The density is more than the critical density in such a case .Thus the shape of universe would be like given by David gow77 in his article of case having density more than critical density.That space would be courled up so differently i hope u understand.


Light Distortion--
The distortion or space time warp is more in case of MBB .Thus distortion is to such an extent that we aren't able to see objects beyond 12 bill. Light yrs., but we are able to see those objects with some less distortion and thus here is a shortcoming of this concept and can form a good "protester".


Dark Matter-
The proportion of dark matter is much more in case of MBB due to abundance of massive objects. Thus in such types of universe Dark Matter (present in halo around galaxies) will be dominant force in the universe to such an extent that each galaxy will develop its black hole as soon as it can.


So.that's all i am sorry that i can't send to you the graphics and illustrations, there was an operating problem.It took me 6 days to analyze this with mathematical calculations.I hope you like it.
...

Click here to read the entire article