How I Killed Cosmology

[paradigm]

Although I’m quite prepared to plead guilty to killing Cosmology, I was provoked by absurdity.

It was an ordinary day, I think it was a Wednesday, when suddenly I realized that the big bang theory was a load of rubbish. How could any rational person be expected to believe that there was a time before time begun. With this insult to my intelligence I set about proving that the Universe did not begin with a big bang, nor even a little bang.

I soon discovered that the big bang theory was the idea of an Astronomer named of Edwin Hubble in 1929. This same Edwin Hubble had decided the year before that a Nebula galaxy called the Crab Nebula was only 900 years old. That’s like saying that the Earth has just had its first birthday.

Hubble had noticed that the light from some galaxies was increased in wavelength more than the light from other galaxies. This increase in wavelength is called a red shift on a spectrum which runs from the blue or narrow wavelength end to the red or wide wavelength end. To explain this phenomena he had the brilliant idea of seeing the galaxies as accelerating away, and that the further away they were the faster they were accelerating away. This could only be the case if the galaxies had been closer together at some time in the past.

Another brilliant idea was needed to explain how the galaxies had gone from being closer together to being getting further apart, and doing so at an increase rate of acceleration. Enter the big bang theory. If the Universe had begun with a big bang, then this would explain the galaxies accelerating away and involve the whole Universe expanding.

This big bang was supposed to have occurred by magic, because no explanation was offered for the cause of this big bang. In more recent times Cosmologist have talked about the Universe expanding and then contracting back to the point from which it originally expanded with the big bang. Presumably, this expanding and contracting would go on indefinitely.

Back in 1929 a Swiss Astronomer by the name of Fritz Zwicky disagreed with Edwin Hubble, and proposed that the red shift was a product of the light increasing in wavelength as it travelled. Essentially, he was saying that light disperses as it travels. His idea was called the “tired light” theory. However, it was rejected by most Astronomers in favor of the big bang theory.

The reason that it was rejected had nothing to do with whether or not it was a better explanation than the big bang theory. It was rejected because if it was right then the whole idea of using light as a means for measuring the distances to galaxies and stars would also have to be rejected. It would also mean that you could not interpret the light from galaxies and stars as indicating the present of particular elements which on Earth had the same wavelength. The whole of Cosmology is based on being able to use the light of galaxies and stars as a means of measurement and for accurate interpretation. It was much better to have the absurdity of the big bang theory than to destroy the whole of Cosmology.

You have probably heard of the physics measurement called a light year. This purports to represent the distance that light travels in one year. This is based on the idea that light has a specific speed everywhere in the Universe, which is naturally called the speed of light.

You would think that before you started claiming that the speed of light was the same everywhere in the Universe, you would have a sound grasp on the way in which light travelled. Well, you would be wrong. Cosmologists are only interested in measuring things. They have a measuring fetish. In fact, most of physics has a measuring fetish. They often say things like: “if it can’t be measured then it can’t be part of physics.” It’s this measuring fetish which sees them overlook things that others can see quite clearly.

Cosmologists are prepared to see light as a wave of emission. However, they’re also prepared to see the space in which these waves travel as a vacuum. In fact the speed of light is deemed to be the speed of flight in the vacuum of space. If light travels as a wave then surely it’s occupying the so called vacuum of space. It’s obvious to you and me, but not obvious to the Cosmologists.

Light can be both a wave and a particle called a photon. For some, this dual nature is completely inexplicable. When confronted with such a duality, the thing to do is find a more fundamental position from which to view the matter. Another term for light is emission. It covers a spectrum from what is visible to that is which far below the visible spectrum. In fact, a dark room is full of emission that is well below the visible part of the spectrum.

If we see the particle called a photon as a fusion or construction of emission, then we can see light is the dispersion or de-construction of photons as particles. A wave of emission (light) is the dispersion of emission, so that waves of emission are constructed from the convergence of different densities of emission. Cosmologists don’t even ask how waves of emission (light) are constructed into waves. They’re only interested in measuring things.

The light from galaxies and stars is increased in wavelength because it’s encountering emission of decreased density. The light from our Sun is increased in wavelength, but the Cosmologists not are claiming that the Sun is accelerating away. They attribute this red shift to the gravitational field of the Sun. And this is correct. However, the gravitational field of the Sun and the emission of the Sun are one and the same thing. A gravitational field is an emission field. It’s the convergence of emission fields which constructs the wavelengths within the fields.

The Earth is attracted to the Sun through absorbing the emission of the Sun via the Earth emission (gravitational) field. At least part of the emission absorbed by the emission field of the Earth reaches the core of the Earth.

You may be surprise to know that during a solar eclipse the gravity of the Earth is decreased, because the Moon in blocking part of the emission of the Sun and causing a decrease in the density of the Earth’s emission (gravitational) field. The gravity of the Earth also increases over time. In the time of the Dinosaurs, for example, it was less than it is now.

The red shift in the light from galaxies is indicative of the fact that their emission (gravitational) field decreases in density with the increase in the distance from the galaxy. It is not caused by the galaxies accelerating away. But physics already knows this, because Relativity theory states that light increases in wavelength when it travels in a direction that is opposite to a gravitational field. It’s just that physics has yet to realize that a gravitational field is an emission field.

Light travels through interacting with light, so that he speed of light is relative to the density of the emission (light) through which it travels. As the density of the emission called space varies in density relative to the distance from galaxies and stars and planets, light most certainly does not have a uniform speed through-out the Universe. If you require measurement verification, then measure the speed of light above the surface of the Earth and then at the surface and you will discover that it travels faster above the surface than at the surface due to the decreased density of the emission (gravitational) field of the Earth above the surface. The measurement called a light year is nonsense.

The final blow in the death of Cosmology came about through my invention and discovery of a paradigm that applies across Cosmology and Biology. Once I realized that the Universe did not begin with a big bang, I also realized that it was infinite in space and time. If you could get onto a space craft and travel out into space, and avoid running into galaxies and solar systems and stars, you will just keep on going infinitely. Well, actually, your space-craft would de-construct (fall apart) the further it moved away from the solar system towards the decreasing density of the emission called space.

In 1971 an experiment was conducted which involved two atomic clocks, so that the regular rate of atomic decay was representing the usual ticking of a clock. One of these clocks was place in an airplane above the surface of the Earth, and the other on the surface of the Earth. It was discovered that the clock in the airplane ticked faster than the one on the surface of the Earth. This result proves that the stability of atomic structure is relative to the density of the impacting emission. However, the result of the experiment has been over-looked by physics. Physics sees the stability of atomic structure only in terms of internal binding between particles. Basically, they messed-up big time.

Soon after realizing that the Universe was infinite in space and time, I also realized that it didn’t involve an infinite number of different types of things. I reasoned that if the Universe did involve and infinite number of different types of things, then it would also involve an infinite variety of things. Infinite variety means that there wouldn’t be the discrete types of things that we observe. The only logical conclusion is that there are a finite number of types of things within the infinite space and time of the Universe. Everything that can exist, such as us Humans, must exist and infinite number of times and do so in every moment of time.

The paradigm I invented and discovered was based on the idea that the Universe is a self-constructing and self-quantifying process that results in the types of things that we observe. This is the process we call evolution. Everything evolves from a simpler form. The paradigm is expressed as an hierarchical structure of numbers and arrows. However, the numbers are not arithmetic. They are quantitative representations, or specifications, of everything that can be constructed and evolve in the Universe. The arrows indicate the connection between things. These numbers and arrows form logic statements of scientific fact.

With the assistance of the paradigm I’ve already begun showing how planets and solar systems and galaxies are constructed and evolve. It turns out that our solar system is but one of seven possible types of solar systems. Also, it turns out that our solar system begun with thirteen planets. All planets are constructed from Hydrogen, and over time and through the absorption of emission build the elements. This occurs within the context of the increasing density of impacting emission. The very thing demonstrated with the atomic clocks experiment.

The numbers of the paradigm are both questions and answers. Because the Universe is a totally connected and consistent process, by beginning a one place on the paradigm you can discover other things by continually establishing the identities of the numbers.

I should also point out how I discovered the cause of gravity. Since the time of Isaac Newton, physics has been trying to understand the cause (or mechanism) of gravity. Their latest idea was that it’s caused by the absorption and exchange of a particle they call a graviton. Well, I conducted a simply little electrostatic experiment and decided that gravity was caused by the absorption and exchange of emission. This means that everything, including small sub-atomic particles, absorb and emit emission and have gravitational (emission) fields.

As a consequence of inventing and discovering the paradigm, I made a truly amazing discovery. This is what I call ‘numeric symmetry” or, more correctly “quantitative correspond across levels of construction”. When we see everything as a quantity within all the other quantities of the Universe, it turns out that many things share the same quantity as a number. For example, in biology a micro-organism called a Prokaryote has 9 parts to its structure and the Bacteria sub-type of Prokaryotes involves 9 types. Within cosmology, there are 13 types of barred spiral galaxy and our solar system begun with 13 planets.

The paradigm specifies the past, the present and the future. As a logically consistent and complete specification, it’s infallible. Humans can be wrong with their application of the paradigm, but the paradigm itself can’t be wrong. I dare say that some people will call it the theory of everything.

The paradigm is presented in an essay titled “An Infinite Moment of Time”. The sub-title is 22ß13 [6]ß29. This means that Humans can only evolve on a planet that is the 6th from the edge of a solar system that begun with 13 planets and that exists within a Spiral galaxy that has 29 types. It also specifies the evolution of Humans to the nth degree of detail. The essay is subject to continual development as I pursue the application of the paradigm. It can be accessed on the internet at: http://members.westnet.com.au/paradigm/forever.pdf

That just leaves me to say, welcome to the future of science and the end of Cosmology as a separate discipline of science.


Stephen Mooney

[austintorn@aol.com]

Good ideas.

I reasoned that if the Universe did involve and infinite number of different types of things, then it would also involve an infinite variety of things.

Infinite energy would also make it very crowded around here. Or would it fit in infinite space?

We must also remember, that, for some actual things (not potential), the definition of 'infinity' is that sequence or amount which can never be completed.

A e/m emission, for example may head out 'forever' but never actually get 'there'.