[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

Michael;
In many ways I can agree; however though the wisdom of science is failing, the knowledge of science is well beyond our ancestors.
Regards;
Dave

Well Dave I agree with that!Science is advancing way beyond
its wisdom,to fully understand the finer implications of all its findings.





kindest regards michael.

[sruthisupriya]

Originally Posted by dleviwing

I would interpret the vortex as the interactions of a spinning sphere that bonds with its environmental surroundings and produces the spiral shape.

Why always a sphere?

[mkirkpatrick]

From the outer most reaches of matter,in our three dimensional world the vortex
plays its part,the spin is recognised by us in everyday occurences,water rushing
down the drain whirlwinds,tornados,etc,at the sub-atomic level they are every where,they arealso present on many dimensional levels thatwe are as yet not
aware of.each human being for example,is within energy fields that rotate and
spin,in the east,and also gaining much ground in the west too,there are seven
major centres,called chakras,these exist just outside of (but our connected to)
our three dimensional world,these centres that we all have our tiny-vortexes
connecting us to the inner mindful energy,one daysoon we will all understand
what we really are and will be able to balance these energies and expand our
inner awareness and consciousness ,the vortex is the ultimate messenger the
bearer of intention wrapped in a spiral?The master weavers loom spins on the
birth of idea made manifest in the birth of a dot-that became a spiral within
a spiral.
kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Okay, Michael, while I understand the yin/yang nature that permeates everything, I am not sure how this has to do with vortexes (?). Are you saying that gravity is between the opposition of vortexee? or that gravity is wholly (or partially) contained in one or the other vortex? Given (as you astutely noted) its lack of aberration or propogation delay, one would assume that it is not contained between the vortexes, given the constant need to balance...

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by harmonygirl

Okay, Michael, while I understand the yin/yang nature that permeates everything, I am not sure how this has to do with vortexes (?). Are you saying that gravity is between the opposition of vortexee? or that gravity is wholly (or partially) contained in one or the other vortex? Given (as you astutely noted) its lack of aberration or propogation delay, one would assume that it is not contained between the vortexes, given the constant need to balance...

I suppose Harmony I am saying that
if the vortex were (removed) from the "picture" then gravity could not exist!
The very basic nature of all energies is rotational,All manifestation within this
universe,without exception,spins,and is held in the embrace of the vortex.
And gravity is no exception.


kind regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

Okay, I agree that all energy is rotational (in a 2 and 3 dimensional sense). So is gravity involved in the interplay between 2 different rotational forces (or the same force rotating in different directions and meeting)?

[Mohan.C]

Isn't it true that objects tends to be spherical because it is the least volume to occupy or you can the more confined state. If you see, it is also true that sphere is more stable than other shapes. It does not have sharp edges ie. what I mean is, it is symmetrical and even the waves are kind of spherical. It is common knowledge that everything in the universe tend to take the most stable state. Objects spin so that a balanced force could be established. When there is an imbalance it rushes to cover it up but there is a imbalance in other point so it spins. That is I hope could be the origin of your vortex. And your theory could explain a lot. Including spiritual, philosophical and scientific problems.

[harmonygirl]

Hey Mohan, you just led me to a thought. Maybe objects are (naturally?) spherical because of gravity functioning as the attraction part of the attraction/repulsion nature of energy! What do you think?

[mkirkpatrick]

It remains somewhat difficult to explain the unexplainable!But that should
not deter the seeker of "wholes".This physical universe had a beginning,of that I am absolutely certain.What you call this beginning is unimportant I feel
Big bang,whatever,I see the "birth" as a point,a dimensionless point,that arose out of absolute unified void of "unrealized potential",from this "point a
line extended out of the void,into what would become the physical universe.
The line of was was now "realized" potentual and extending ever further into
the embryonic universe,the "pressure wave" of this energy along the line,
"began to fall"one to the left and one to the right,the birth of spin had begun
and the birth of two opposing forces,Ying and Yang,The vortex of opposing
spins rolled ever outwards.

kind regards michael.

[michellemfry]

There are things that exist that never affect themselves or are affected by themselves. Take the catalyst, which enters and exits a reaction, makes the impossible possible and remains unchanged, undiminished, conceptually difficult to comprehend isn't it?
Have we found the origin of potential? Have we even looked for it? We have long accepted it's reality. Rotational gravity has more to do with potential generation, I suspect. Nice thought to generate a generator.