[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Vincent Wee-Foo

Hello Michael,

I read every single one of your post here concerning vortex, have to say your strong gut feel about it is not unfounded and not overstated. I admire your passion in seeking for the answers pertaining vortex and your insight is inspiring.

I know you should be aware by now of a new thread I have started in the TOEQuest on vortex. Looking forward for you to join me in the discussion in great spirit, I believe we will make good acquaintances.



Best regards Vincent.

Thank you Vincent,I will be heading on over to your thread in a moment or two,it would indeed be an honour sir to be your friend.

warmest regards michael.

[PoPpAScience]

Hi Michael;

I was going through my list of subscribed threads and came across your thread here. I was so surprised to see and realize that I read this thread and posted to it, but did not see the main jest of your thread. I did not take enough notice of your use of the idea's of Vortex, centripetal, centrifugal. I did take notice of your use of the idea's of energy and potential, which I posted to.

What I find amazing now is that you posted your main thoughts here in 2005 about the Vortex, and yet it took Vincent Wee-Foo's thread on "Universal Vortical Singularity" this year to finally get me off the wave-length/particle band wagon. I have since moved to the idea of the Vortex at the centre of the sub atomic world, with the wave-function as a measuring of the oscillitating factor of the whirl of the Vortex, and the measuring of the particle, as the measuring of the position of the Zero-point at the core of the Vortex.

It is also amazing how it took so long for me to catch on to the significance of the centripetal and centrifugal forces in the make up of the micro and macro world. It took the thread on "Fluid Energy Theory" by Jimbo, to finally wake me up to importance of centripetal and centrifugal forces dictating the make up of our Universal.

I believe we are finally going to have a good argument here in the TOEquest on the merit of the Vortex as the dictator of matter. We have some good experts in this forum in Vincent Wee-Foo and Jimbo who are going to add weight to the argument. I am very impressed with the expert level of Jimbo's arguments and have become a fan of his FET theory.

I have come to a new conclusion in the last week about the make up of the Vortex, which I will post in my thread in the near future. I was amazed to see that you used worded descriptions, in a round about way, here in this thread about my latest idea about the Vortex. Those words are, "unmanifested energy/potential". I think you will like what I have come up with on this Idea when I post it. I'll let you know.

Thanks for your effort to wake me up, and others, and sorry for not catching on in November when I read it.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Hi Michael;

I was going through my list of subscribed threads and came across your thread here. I was so surprised to see and realize that I read this thread and posted to it, but did not see the main jest of your thread. I did not take enough notice of your use of the idea's of Vortex, centripetal, centrifugal. I did take notice of your use of the idea's of energy and potential, which I posted to.

What I find amazing now is that you posted your main thoughts here in 2005 about the Vortex, and yet it took Vincent Wee-Foo's thread on "Universal Vortical Singularity" this year to finally get me off the wave-length/particle band wagon. I have since moved to the idea of the Vortex at the centre of the sub atomic world, with the wave-function as a measuring of the oscillitating factor of the whirl of the Vortex, and the measuring of the particle, as the measuring of the position of the Zero-point at the core of the Vortex.

It is also amazing how it took so long for me to catch on to the significance of the centripetal and centrifugal forces in the make up of the micro and macro world. It took the thread on "Fluid Energy Theory" by Jimbo, to finally wake me up to importance of centripetal and centrifugal forces dictating the make up of our Universal.

I believe we are finally going to have a good argument here in the TOEquest on the merit of the Vortex as the dictator of matter. We have some good experts in this forum in Vincent Wee-Foo and Jimbo who are going to add weight to the argument. I am very impressed with the expert level of Jimbo's arguments and have become a fan of his FET theory.

I have come to a new conclusion in the last week about the make up of the Vortex, which I will post in my thread in the near future. I was amazed to see that you used worded descriptions, in a round about way, here in this thread about my latest idea about the Vortex. Those words are, "unmanifested energy/potential". I think you will like what I have come up with on this Idea when I post it. I'll let you know.

Thanks for your effort to wake me up, and others, and sorry for not catching on in November when I read it.

Thanks so much Allen,glad you found something useful there,look forward to your idea
when you next post.

regards michael.

[Tina]

Michael Hi - this sure is a real old forum topic but I found this article that may interest you. If you are not farmiliar with this research - prepare for a big surprise!

http://www.rsarchive.org/RelArtic/Marinelli/

[Tina]

Originally Posted by PoPpAScience

Hi Michael;

I believe we are finally going to have a good argument here in the TOEquest on the merit of the Vortex as the dictator of matter.

I have come to a new conclusion in the last week about the make up of the Vortex, which I will post in my thread in the near future. I was amazed to see that you used worded descriptions, in a round about way, here in this thread about my latest idea about the Vortex. Those words are, "unmanifested energy/potential". I think you will like what I have come up with on this Idea when I post it. I'll let you know.

Hi again PoP,

This certainly is an exciting area of investigation. I have not read Jimbo's or Vincent's topics yet but I come from an Electric universe perspective and assume, at this stage, that the answers to understanding the Vortex will lie in understanding the magnetic fields and electon transfers involved in driving the Vortex.

Also we can ask what is the connection between double helix formations (s.a. the structure of DNA (electronic) and the entwined filaments of electron flow through magnetic fields) and the spiraling structure of the Vortex???

I look forward to reading your ideas on unmanifested energy/potential.

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Tina

Michael Hi - this sure is a real old forum topic but I found this article that may interest you. If you are not farmiliar with this research - prepare for a big surprise!

http://www.rsarchive.org/RelArtic/Marinelli/

Thank you very much Tina,this is a belated reply as have just noticed it,I was unaware
of the vortexial interactions within the heart,but I am not surprised they are there though.

I have looked through the link you kindly supplied,it is full of real interesting stuff.




regards michael.