Economy of the Vortex-is it perfect?

[mkirkpatrick]

I would like start this thread with a phenomenon that has fasinated me for years
that of the vortex,the spiral,nature-seems to favour the spiral why!we seem to
be surrounded by spinning vortices of energy,even our lives seem to go around and around! slowly gaining height with each turn.Galaxies swirl around each other,even the spiral on a snails shell,is a tiny version of a spiral galaxy,the
rotation of energy seems to be the most ecomnomical way of transferring energy from one point to another.Black-holes seem to be very robust vortexes.
Can science explain the humble Vortex! I look forward to your replies,if there
is any that is?

kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Well, one day, an incredible idea occured in my mind. In so general things as linear-curvued problems, usually only 1 exists in the universe. So I decided that the most probable thing was that all of what looked of one, but there would be less that look of that one, would be actually illusions. That is, if there are 60% curves and 40% strainght, then, the straight are probably illusions, and are really curves. So I decoded to take note of as many things that I saw in one day, and right in a paper a tick for each, in the curve or straight column. At the end of the day there were around 10 curves for each straight. So I decided that probably those are illusions. Thus, everything is curved/Spiral.

HOW? WHY?

The two major questions. The first one, scientific. The second one, philosophical. Answering them would be an important step into understanding the important fundamental laws of nature.

[mkirkpatrick]

Is the vortex the signature of cosmic intelligence, or just a cosmic-anomaly of
no real significance! That is the question I would like discussed, any-takers?

kind regards michael.

[Guille]

Michael, before answering. What do you mean here by vortex exactly?

[mkirkpatrick]

Guille,amigo,Whatdo I mean by a vortex?Thats a good question!For anything to
be Real,I mean absolutely Real,it has to not only be universal,must must also be
present on all levels of manifestation,and also be there In-Waiting(Potential)in
the Unmanifested state also.The one thing that I know that fits the bill is the
Little ole-Vortex,which is present Everywhere,the vortex is to all intents and
purposes,OminPresent!We are completely surrounded by the little fellows!they can be quite content spinning away in the Sub-Atomic level,and be equally at
home in a massive Black-hole that is very Huge.To me they are The Work-horses
of What-Is-They are the Embodiment Of Economy,to which Itelligence beyond our Ken,uses to tranfer,What!! energy,force,matter,or maybe just an Idea.?



kind regards michael.

[Graybeard]

Michael .......nature abhors a straight line ......

[Guille]

Mike,

I think that actually this theory of yours is too philosophical and too little scientific. Is it just another word for the hypothetical aether?

Greg,

What do you actually mean by your post? I believe that the straight line doesn't exist, everything is curved, changed, variable... you can look for many synonyms.

[mkirkpatrick]

Mike,

I think that actually this theory of yours is too philosophical and too little scientific. Is it just another word for the hypothetical aether?

Greg,

What do you actually mean by your post? I believe that the straight line doesn't exist, everything is curved, changed, variable... you can look for many synonyms.

Buenes Noches,esto mas en la vida que' ciencia.Amigo.

kind regards michael.

[Graybeard]

Guille ...... Nature abhors a straight line ..... & ..... Nature abhors a vacuum ....
This was a light hearted humorous reply ... not meant to be serious. These are common sayings in Australia ..... They are sort of proverbs. They don't have any scientific basis. I think thay have arisen because it is almost impossible to find a straight line in nature unless man has been present. As you said in your post ... straight lines are almost impossible to find ... diminishing perspectives create curves.

Cheers Greg!

[Guille]

Buenes Noches,esto mas en la vida que' ciencia.Amigo.


kind regards michael.

Were did you learn your spanish? It's ok, but not good. lol.

There is a real problem for English speaking people to learn Spanish, and it is that in Spanish we have two verbs for the verb to be, we have ser and estar. Ser is used for statical properties, whiles estar is for temporal things. The bad thing about this division is that sometimes one thing can be either, for example, you can be stupid or be being stupid, i.e. ser estupido, or, estar estupido.

Anyway, I think what you meant is that there is more to life than science. Well, there is, but, you see, it is philosophy.