Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1. #11
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile the flame of life burns brightly.

    Quote Originally Posted by michellemfry
    Hey, Michael, I need a light ...Yes, I really do...
    Michelle,there is a spark within you,fan it and it will glow!
    With the chat room closed,drop me an email,take care.


    kindest regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  2. #12
    7th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    India
    Posts
    1,000
    Blog Entries
    25
    Thanks Given
    111
    Thanked 48x in 38 Posts
    Rep Power
    39
    Quote Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
    You seem hungry Mohan?These "facts" that I mention,and yes they are facts to me,to others,it is fantasy,bull...t,lunacy,fanciful notions of absurdity! The
    world is full of mockers and scoffers,but such is life.I have gathered these ideas from all over this world,much indeed from your own land,a land with a
    great depth of spirituality,the noble teachings of the Bhagavad Gita,It is inte-
    resting that there is no Sanskrit word that is equivalent to the word "religion".
    Instead Hinduism sees itself as an approach to understanding our place in the
    universe."we all need to find our own way Home,to the God within us.I have
    also learned much from the orient,from Europe,and from our brothers the north American Indians,who have a profound wisdom,that is in grave danger
    of being lost.The living fires of creation,burn away the dross,to reveal that
    "jewel" that is within,a gem that is liquid fire.To look within its Flame,one has
    to "die" of self?

    kind regards michael.
    One does really have to die of self. But still I have a doubt which I hope you can clear 1.When we die of self won't we be aware of it?
    2.Do we need to deflate our ego to gain or for what?
    3.Do we live to gain, What is it that we must gain?
    4.Is to gain is to be greedy or is it necessity?
    Well, I hope this did not become too spiritual seeing it is in the cosmological theories forum!!.


  3. #13
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile The land of shadows is a fearful place.

    Mohan.C.It is good to ask questions,and when you get answers to them,test
    them,try them,see within yourself,intuitively if it seems so!If what is said offends your reason,then reject it! it is not for you.If on the otherhand it "feels" right,and does not offend your inner reason,then accept it and move on.You asked when we die of self,wont we be aware of it?Yes,you will be aware of it!But you will "refrain" from reflecting on it!Do we need to deflate
    our ego to gain,or for what?There is no (gain)or loss,only re-discovery of
    you rightful inheritence!An inflated ego,courts its kinfolk,that of arrogance
    and low-deceit.And presents an inpeneterable barrier for any spiritual
    practises or disciplines.Do we live to gain,what isit that we must gain?
    We live,neither for loss nor gain,but,unfoldment,to re-discover,who,and,what
    we really are,evolution is a unfolding process!
    Lastly you asked,is to gain,is to be greedy,or is it necessity!It is of necessity
    that through life long endevour of practising the principles of unfoldment,
    you will unfold!Greed and gain belong to the land of shadows and fear,and if
    one is wise,you recoil from them as you would a striking Cobra?
    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  4. #14
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool fire consumes all...

    Interesting notion Michael, but you might as well say all is air or water or earth. Fire is only one of the fundamental elements and is energy in one form only. I think all is energy. Interesting that of all the fundamental elements (or directions according to Aboriginal lore), fire is the only one that is time dependant. I wonder if that is significant...just musing out loud...
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  5. #15
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile One in three and three in one.

    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    Interesting notion Michael, but you might as well say all is air or water or earth. Fire is only one of the fundamental elements and is energy in one form only. I think all is energy. Interesting that of all the fundamental elements (or directions according to Aboriginal lore), fire is the only one that is time dependant. I wonder if that is significant...just musing out loud...
    That is not correct,Harmony,the source that informed me
    of these "ideas" that from the ancient wisdom,and the esoteric teachings
    and science of the east,say,that "all" is fire,Air=fludic fire,Water=liquid fire,
    Earth=solid fire,a triplicity of fire that is universal in operation.

    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  6. #16
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool could the source be wrong?

    but Michael, couldn't the same thing be said of air or water (or to a certain extent earth)? Maybe the point here is that they are indeed one, but by categorizing all into a certain one, we are allowing hierarchy (and evaluation) to reign (?)...this doesn't make sense to me...
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  7. #17
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile where the wind doth blow and mind is in tow?

    Quote Originally Posted by harmonygirl
    but Michael, couldn't the same thing be said of air or water (or to a certain extent earth)? Maybe the point here is that they are indeed one, but by categorizing all into a certain one, we are allowing hierarchy (and evaluation) to reign (?)...this doesn't make sense to me...
    You are of course correct,up to a point,Harmony,they are indeed one,that "appear" as three,but in dealing and in understanding these aspects,
    one needs to be mindful,that each aspect,as it "appears" to present "itself"?
    in a centre of intelligent consciousness,and are indeed within an hierarchy!
    Each to its own,although,they all impinge on each others realms,at certain
    points!We in the west just see "mindless" elements,in the east they see and
    oft-times communicate with the elementals,as points of intelligence,and noble bearing!

    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  8. #18
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool hierarchy is not natural, and hence, I don't believe true...

    I think we might have to disagree here Michael. I don't believe that hierarchy is a natural state of being. I don't believe "better than" applies in nature. There is difference, of couse, but no valuation, credit/discredit situation. I think this is just the lens we put on things. Out of curiousity, when communicating with some elements, in Eastern thought, are they viewed in a hierarchical fashion?
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

  9. #19
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,611
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    294
    Thanked 893x in 723 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile even the stones will aid you.

    Harmony,I understand where you are coming from,and the idea of beings
    better than us,is unacceptable and quite right,and would indeed run contary
    to nature,There is however no question of "better" that is a value judgement
    and has within it ego centric priorities,which some what clouds the issue.
    These life forms,that are on a differing evolutionary path than us,are in a sense seen as brothers,they are "not" seen as better than us,different yes!
    When they are communicated with by our eastern brothers,they are seen as
    that,"brothers"elder brothers yes,but nevertheless as brothers.By the way
    there are many in the west now that thinkthe same,and practise the same
    disciplines.
    To become hungry for the truth,to become bold and join the quest for enlight
    enment,when this is truly your lifes goal,then you ignite the internal fires and
    even the stones on the ground will aid you in this noble quest?
    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  10. #20
    6th degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    844
    Blog Entries
    3
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 2x in 2 Posts
    Rep Power
    32

    Cool okay, learning going on here...

    okay, elements as sisters, I completely get. Different path and elder sisters also make sense to me. You're right the notion of hierarchy only has value judgments because that is the way our society regards it. Maybe it is possible to have hierarchy and not have a "better than" situation. Some of the Buddhist texts that I have read stated this, and caused me to disregard them. I may need to revisit. Thanks Michael.
    The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears

 

 
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top