LinkBack URL
About LinkBacksIf we make the assumption that we are located nearly at the edge of the universe as our present state of 'NOW' then from our point of view the universe gets flatter and flatter as time passes on. So, how much more time has to pass in order for the mean curvature to reach the value of zero?
Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Thread: flatter as time goes by
- 11-07-2005, 01:48 PM #1Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,771
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
flatter as time goes by
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 12-21-2005, 06:09 PM #2Master
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 620
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
- Rep Power
- 30
Aren't we already there?
Michelle
- 12-22-2005, 12:16 PM #3Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,771
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
edge of the universe
Yes. We are at the edge of the universe or the boundary between past and future.
Originally Posted by michellemfry Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 12-22-2005, 04:23 PM #4The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
And the nearer we are from the past, or the further we are from the future, we get spatially further from others. vice versa. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 12-22-2005, 07:21 PM #5Raider of the lost time
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Location
- United States
- Posts
- 11,771
- Blog Entries
- 10
- Thanks Given
- 1,106
- Thanked 1,472x in 1,192 Posts
- Rep Power
- 158
gravity's pull
gravity is pulling us back into the past, while em is pulling us into the future.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c˛
- 12-23-2005, 07:01 AM #6The Thinker
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Spain
- Posts
- 3,278
- Blog Entries
- 7
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
- Rep Power
- 63
Yes, and here comes my theory. There is antigravity, and so this one is pulling us apart from the past (not near the future, but far from the past) whiles EM doesn't have opposite force, so the EM is winning for that. Originally Posted by AntonioLao
- 12-25-2005, 09:38 PM #7Brown Belt
- Join Date
- Dec 2005
- Location
- New Zealand
- Posts
- 170
- Blog Entries
- 3
- Thanks Given
- 0
- Thanked 0x in 0 Posts
- Rep Power
- 25
Originally Posted by <<>> Individually they co-exist together in the same time/space at this present point in time - when they wernt meant to and most likely dont want to << theory of chaosPersonally I know this time is now - we begin to pull our selves apart from the past tendancies that hold us back from the discovery of everything ...The fundamental method of philosophy is the use of reasoning to evaluate arguments concerning these questions ..
Reply With QuoteThread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
My Project For A Central Time-coordinates System
By humanbydefault in forum SpacetimeReplies: 0Last Post: 03-13-2006, 10:47 AM
Posting Permissions
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.11
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:07 AM.
vBulletin 4.0 skin by CompleteVB
