But still it does not tell the tale about the missing solar neutrinos?Originally Posted by baudrunner
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._neutrino.html
But still it does not tell the tale about the missing solar neutrinos?Originally Posted by baudrunner
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._neutrino.html
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Hola chicos,Originally Posted by <<<GUILLE>>>
I got a D in physics back in the 70 too. Although I think it's because the teacher found out that I had stolen a strobe light.
Anyway, about the third law, I don't believe in BHs.
Coldcreation
Were you trying to contact an alien invasion with that strobe light?Originally Posted by Coldcreation
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
¸ ·´¯`· .¸¸..><((((º>hmmm, maybe subconsciously?¸ ·´¯`· .¸¸..><((((º>Originally Posted by AntonioLao
CC
Thanks to you, I think you have scared the aliens and they aborted the invasion.Originally Posted by Coldcreation
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Hola, y feliz 2006 (with 26 days of delay, but it's justified because I've eliminated the notion of time in my life and mind).Originally Posted by Coldcreation
Now, joining Antonio's suggestion with your data, maybe we can conclude the following: there is a hyper conspiracy done by all the governments and power organizations to control all of us that have an important contribution the the TOE, they know when we have one because they have contact with aliens that have telepathy abilities and so, they make changes in our life without us noticing so that we end up somehow here in TOEquest. Or maybe it is Robert of the future that comes to the past, changes our life so that we end up here, and that the TOE occurs around these forums. So probably Antonio wouldn't have come along toequest if he hadn't got bad grades in university, because he would have maybe end up as researcher in the institute of advance study of princeton (because definitely he could be there due to his mind) and maybe you wouldn't have come to toequest if you hadn't got a D in physics. Or maybe I'm stupid and have wasted my time making up this story and abandoning the thread's theme.
Last edited by michellemfry; 01-27-2006 at 11:01 PM.
The neutrinos you seek are still more theoretical than anything else, Antonio. They represent no more than an explanation for missing mass (and momentum) in particle collision experiments. It may very well be that the particles displaying evidence of their existence in those neutrino traps in Japan and in Sudbury, Canada are not even related to the missing mass (and momentum) in those experiments. I think there is every reason to stop and rethink our conclusions lest they lead theory astray, because we have yet barely scratched the surface of the solution to the colossal problem of the TOE and the GUT, and we haven't even come close to understanding the puzzle that contains all the pieces let alone acknowledge their form and the place where they belong. In the final analysis, we have to acknowledge that in our efforts to understand the fundamental particles of nature we require still more knowledge of those most understood particles that carry the charges of electromagnetic positive and electromagnetic negative, otherwise we wouldn't constantly be investing even more billions in separating them from their place in the cosmic scheme of things. Just because we have applications, for example, ripening fruit using gamma radiation (acetylene works too), spotting anatomical problems using x-rays (NMR imaging works too), watching tv (@<- works too), etc. doesn't mean that we are entirely correct in our description of what's going on or that we are complete in our understanding of it. I like to take everything with a grain of salt, tastes better that way.
"There is nothing permanent except change"
Blame this one on the members of TOEQUEST.Originally Posted by baudrunner
But you can blame this one on me for now.Originally Posted by baudrunner
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)