Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Physics > Cosmology
Reload this Page Why Newton’s 3rd law fails?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Why Newton’s 3rd law fails?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
Why Newton’s 3rd law fails? - 01-23-2006, 12:28 PM

Why Newton’s 3rd law fails inside a black-hole? To answer it is to clarify the 3rd law. As stated: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. This statement seems to imply that for a universe filled with singular quantized inactive matter, the second force, the reaction, does not exist until the first force, the action exists. The question is what is the cause of this first action? In term of matter forces such as gravity and inertial force, one suggestion is that matter can create its own force. Therefore the 3rd law is really a law about secondary forces. But it appears that only primary forces can exist inside black-holes. Furthermore only one primary force can be found within a black-hole. The question is then how do two black-holes interact? Since no black-hole can be found within another black-hole it means that primary forces are repulsive. And they can be repulsive if and only if they are equal in magnitude. If one primary force is weaker than its neighboring primary force then the weaker force transforms into a secondary force and becomes attracted toward the stronger primary force.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-23-2006, 03:51 PM

The fundamental statement in it all is 'matter can create it's own force'. If it's true, then we need a third factor, such as your description of secondary forces and repulsive primary forces. But if it's false, then just need to explain the following: As all matter has energy, then the matter automatically creates force when the energy is used, by motion, for example. Now if a black hole is completely stopped and doesn't move, then there is no force in it, this is logical. Or maybe there is a force but it is corresponded by an opposite equal force as the 3rd law states.

Last edited by michellemfry : 01-25-2006 at 01:27 AM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
blackhole
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
blackhole - 01-23-2006, 09:15 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Now if a black hole is completelly stopped and doesn't move, then there is no force in it, this is logical.
I couldn't think of anything that can stop a blackhole from moving. Blackhole is known to swallow matter and radiation. it doesn't need to move, it just keep on eating and eating and eating...and getting fatter and fatter. Although Hawking said that radiation can still escape.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-24-2006, 04:28 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I couldn't think of anything that can stop a blackhole from moving. Blackhole is known to swallow matter and radiation. it doesn't need to move, it just keep on eating and eating and eating...and getting fatter and fatter. Although Hawking said that radiation can still escape.
Hawking could have no tell and keep his mouth closed, at least in that way we could have the illusion of knowing about black holes. What is this radiation made of?

Last edited by michellemfry : 01-25-2006 at 01:28 AM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
photons
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
photons - 01-24-2006, 12:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
What is this radiation made of?
The radiation is made of plain regular magnanimous photons, virtual photons to be exact.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-24-2006, 12:41 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The radiation is made of plain regular magnanimous photons, virtual photons to be exact.
Let me think. Gravitational attraction leads to matter-antimatter crash due to electric charges letting go electromagnetic waves. In terms of time, then we are going from a force to the future back to a force of the past by charges, which are the residuals of history, everything that went down, which I believe is everything, history itself has come down. This is, we are going forward in time and yet it is going backwards, eliminating the history, re-writing it, but this is getting into Baudrillard's philosophy. Let's go back to physics.

Last edited by michellemfry : 01-25-2006 at 01:29 AM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
an F in philosophy
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
an F in philosophy - 01-24-2006, 12:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
but this is getting into Baudrillard's philosophy. Let's go back to physics.
The secret is out that I got an F in philosophy in 1971 and also got Ds in quantum physics but have never move away from physics ever since. But this time, there will be no more academic police to give me more of these Ds or Fs citations.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-24-2006, 01:29 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The secret is out that I got an F in philosophy in 1971 and also got Ds in quantum physics but have never move away from physics ever since. But this time, there will be no more academic police to give me more of these Ds or Fs citations.
Didn't you enjoy the classes, or were you just bad at them?

Anyway once I saw a list of the greatest geniuses in arts, philosophy and science that had got very bad grades in school or in university, there were many. Really many.

Last edited by michellemfry : 01-25-2006 at 01:29 AM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
no enjoyment
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
no enjoyment - 01-24-2006, 01:46 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Didn't you enjoy the classes, or were yo just bad at them?
I also got an F in advanced multivariate calculus. No. I did not enjoy most of the classes.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
01-24-2006, 01:48 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
I also got an F in advanced multivariate calculus. No. I did not enjoy most of the classes.
Why did you study physics then?

Coming back to the theme, do the electrons in black holes or any other antimatter make magnetism?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com